Are children less reliable at making visual identifications than adults? A review

References

• Beal, C. R., Schmitt, K. L., & Dekle, D. J. (1995). Eyewitness identification of children: Effects of absolute judgements, nonverbal response options and event encoding. Law and Human Behavior, 19(2), 197–216. doi:10.1007/BF01499325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, J., & Blades, M. (2006). Children's identification of faces from lineups: The effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1102–1113. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, N., Keast, A., & Sauer, J. D. (2010). Children's eyewitness identification performance: Effects of a not sure response option and accuracy motivation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 261–277. doi:10.1348/135532509X474822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (1999). The suggestibility of children's memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 419–439. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, R., & Corran, E. (2002). Interviewing child witnesses: Past and future. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 4(4), 315–322. doi:10.1350/ijps.4.4.315.10872
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1994). Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children? Visual Cognition, 1(2), 253–274. doi:10.1080/13506289408402302
   Google Scholar
• Ceci, S., & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 403–439. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., & Toglia, M. P. (1987). Suggestibility of children's memory: Psycholegal implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(1), 38–49. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.116.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crookes, K., & McKone, E. (2009). Early maturity of face recognition: No childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space. Cognition, 111(2), 219–247. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, G., Stevenson-Robb, Y., & Flin, R. (1988). Tales out of school: Children's memory for an unexpected event. In M. M. Gruneberg, R. N. Sykes, & P. Morris (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Vol. 1, Memory in everyday life (pp. 122–127). London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G., Tarrant, A., & Flin, R. (1989). Davies, Graham, Close encounters of the witness kind: Children's memory for a simulated health inspection. British Journal of Psychology, 80(4), 415–429. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02333.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Heering, A., Houthuys, S., & Rossion, B. (2007). Holistic face processing is mature at 4 years of age: Evidence from the composite face effect. Journal of experimental child psychology, 96(1), 57–70. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2006.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekle, D. J., Beal, C. R., & Huneycutt, D. (1996). Children as witnesses: A comparison of lineup versus showup identification methods. Children, 10, 1–12. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0860(199603)10:1%3C1::AID-CHI11%3E3.0.CO;2-V
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1977). Developmental changes in the representation of faces. Journal of experimental child psychology, 23(1), 1–22. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(77)90069-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass, A., Smith, C., & Fraser-Thill, R. (2005). A problem with double-blind photospread procedures: Photospread administrators use one eyewitness's confidence to influence the identification of another eyewitness. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 543–562. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6830-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlevy, J. R., & Cherryman, J. (2013). Target-absent eyewitness identification line-ups: Why do children like to choose. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20, 284–293. doi:10.1080/13218719.2012.671584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Schwarz-Kenney, B. M., & Rudy, L. (1991). Children's testimony about a stressful event: Improving children's reports. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1, 69–99.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, B. N., Baker-Ward, L., & Ornstein, P. A. (2001). Children's testimony: A review of research on memory for past experiences. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 4(2), 157–181. doi:10.1023/A:1011333231621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J., & Haynes, H. (1996). Eyewitness identification by 5- to 6-year-old. Children, 20, 359–373. doi:10.1007/BF01499028
   Google Scholar
• Havard, C., & Memon, A. (2009). The influence of face age on identification from a video line-up: A comparison between older and younger adults. Memory, 17(8), 847–859. doi:10.1080/09658210903277318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havard, C., & Memon, A. (2013). The Mystery Man can help to reduce false identification for child witnesses: Evidence from video lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 50–59. doi:10.1002/acp.2870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havard, C., Memon, A., Chaudhry, F., Clifford, B., & Gabbert, F. (2008, September). The behaviour of witnesses viewing VIPER parades: Evidence from a Scottish survey. Poster presented at the 2nd Scottish Institute of policing Research (SIPR) Annual Conference, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Havard, C., Memon, A., Clifford, B., & Gabbert, F. (2010). A comparison of video and static photo lineups with child and adolescent witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(9), 1209–1221. doi:10.1002/acp.1645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havard, C., Memon, A., Laybourn, P., & Cunningham, C. (2012). Own-age bias in video lineups: A comparison between children and adults. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 929–944. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.598156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries, J. E., Holliday, R., & Flowe, H. D. (2012). Faces in motion: Age related changes in eyewitness identification performance in simultaneous, sequential and elimination video lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 149–158. doi:10.1002/acp.1808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocent Project. (2012). Eyewitness misidentification. Retrieved from http://www.innocenceproject.org/understand/Eyewitness-Misidentification.php
   Google Scholar
• Jack, F., Walker, S., & Zajac, R. (2010). Improving children's accuracy on target-absent lineups: Do the physical characteristics of the wildcard influence its success? American Psychology-Law Society, 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Karageorge, A., & Zajac, R. (2011). Exploring the effects of age and delay on children's person identifications: Verbal descriptions, lineup performance, and the influence of wildcards. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 161–83. doi:10.1348/000712610X507902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneller, W., Memon, A., & Stevenage, S. (2001). Simultaneous and sequential lineups: Decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(6), 659–671. doi:10.1002/acp.739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, E. S., & Condon, C. A. (1999). Why people say “yes”: A dual process theory of acquiescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 379–386. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, R. C. L., Pozzulo, J. D., Craig, W., Lee, K., & Corber, S. (1997). Simultaneous lineups, sequential lineups, and showups: Eyewitness identification decisions of adults and children. Children, 21, 391–404.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, R. C., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 556–564. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenstein, J. A., Blank, H., & Sauer, J. D. (2010). Uniforms affect the accuracy of children 's eyewitness identification decisions. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7(1), 59–73. doi:10.1002/jip.104
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Havard, C., Clifford, B., Gabbert, F., & Watt, M. (2011). A field evaluation of the VIPER system: A new technique for eliciting eyewitness identification evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(8), 711–729. doi:10.1080/10683160903524333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Hope, L., & Bull, R. (2003). Exposure duration: Effects on eyewitness accuracy and confidence. British Journal of Psychology, 94(3), 339–354. doi:10.1348/000712603767876262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, J. F., & Carranza, L. E. (1989). Eyewitness testimony of children in target-present and target-absent lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 13(2), 133–149. doi:10.1007/BF01055920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, J. F., & Ryan, V. (1993). An attempt to reduce guessing behavior in children's and adults' eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 17(1), 11–26. doi:10.1007/BF01044534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. R., McAuliff, B. D., Kovera, M., & Cutler, B. L. (1999). Double-blind photoarray administration as a safeguard against investigator bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(6), 940–951. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, G., Brace, N., & Kynan, S. (2002). The visual identification of suspects: Procedures and practises. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, J. D. (2007). Person description and identification by child witnesses. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology Vol. II: Memory for people (pp. 377–425). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, J. D., & Balfour, J. (2006). Children's and adults' eyewitness identification accuracy when a culprit changes his appearance: Comparing simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11(1), 25–34. doi:10.1348/135532505X52626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, J. D., & Dempsey, J. (2006). Biased lineup instructions: Examining the effect of pressure on children's and adults eyewitness identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(6), 1381–1394. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, J. D., Dempsey, J., & Crescini, C. (2009). Preschoolers' person description and identification accuracy: A comparison of the simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 667–676. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2009.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, J. D., Dempsey, J., & Gascoigne, E. (2009). Eyewitness accuracy when making multiple identifications using the elimination line-up. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16(Suppl.1), S101–S111. doi:10.1080/13218710802456025
   Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, J. D., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1997). Increasing correct identifications by children. Expert Evidence, 5(4), 126–132. doi:10.1023/A:1008875802767
   Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, J. D., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1998). Identification accuracy of children versus adults: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 22(5), 549–570. doi:10.1023/A:1025739514042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, J. D., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1999). Elimination lineups: An improved identification procedure for child eyewitnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 167–176. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, J. D., & Warren, K. L. (2003). Descriptions and identifications of strangers by youth and adult eyewitnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 315–323. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. G., & Anastasi, J. S. (2012). The own-age bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 138(1), 146–174. doi:10.1037/a0025750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spring, T., Saltzstein, H. D., & Peach, R. (2013). Children's eyewitness identification as implicit moral decision-making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 272, 139–275. doi:10.1002/acp.2871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L. (1993). Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 22–33. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterman, A. H., Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (2000). Do children try to answer nonsensical questions? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(2), 211–225. doi:10.1348/026151000165652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, R., & Hayne, H. (2003). I don't think that's what really happened: The effect of cross examination on the accuracy of children's reports. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9(3), 187–195. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.9.3.187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, R., & Karageorge, A. (2009). The wildcard: A simple technique for improving children's target-absent lineup performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 358–368. doi:10.1002/acp.1511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar