Validation of the factor structure and predictive validity of the Forensic Evidence Evaluation Bias Scale for robbery and sexual assault trial scenarios

References

• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm, V. (1968). Mr Prejudice, Miss Sympathy, and the authoritarian personality: An application of psychological measuring techniques to the problem of jury bias. Wisconsin Law Review, 3, 734–750. Retrieved from http://www.wisconsinlawreview.org/
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S., & Dioso-Villa, R. (2007). CSI and its effects: Media, juries and the burden of proof. New England Law Review, 41, 435–469. Retrieved from http://newenglrev.com/
   Google Scholar
• Criminal Justice System. ( n.d.). Jury eligibility criteria. Retrieved from http://www.cjsonline.gov.uk/juror/summoning/elegibility/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Belief in a just world: Validity correlates of two scales. Psychologische Beitrage, 29, 596–615. Retrieved from http://www.pabst-publishers.com/Psychologie/psyzeit/psybeit/
   Google Scholar
• De La Fuente, L., De La Fuente, E., & Garcia, J. (2003). Effects of pretrial juror bias, strength of evidence and deliberation process on juror decisions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 197–209. doi:10.1080/1068316031000116283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiStefano, C., & Hess, B. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: An empirical review. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 225–241. doi:10.1177/073428290502300303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairchild, A., MacKinnon, D., Taborga, M., & Taylor, A. (2009). R2 effect-size measures for mediation analysis. Behavioral Research Methods, 41, 486–498. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.2.486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, P. (1991). Is attorney-conducted voir dire an effective procedure for the selection of impartial juries? American University Law Review, winter issue, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. R. (1957). Authoritarian attitudes and personality maladjustment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 303–311. doi:10.1037/h0043711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S., & Wrightsman, L. (1983). The construction and validation of a juror bias scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 423–442. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(83)90070-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S., & Wrightsman, L. (1988). The American jury on trial: Psychological perspectives. New York: Hemisphere Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Barak, G., & Shelton, D. (2009). Examining the “CSI effect” in the cases of circumstantial evidence and eyewitness testimony: Multivariate and path analyses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 452–460. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecci, L., & Myers, B. (2002). Examining the construct validity of the original and revised JBS: A cross-validation of sample and method. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 455–463. doi:10.1023/A:1016335422706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecci, L., & Myers, B. (2008). Individual differences in attitudes relevant to juror decision making: Development and validation of the Pretrial Juror Attitude Questionnaire (PJAQ). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2010–2038. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levesque, R. (2006). The psychology and law of criminal justice processes. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M., De La Fuente, L., De La Fuente, I., & Garcia, J. (2007). The influence of sample type, presentation format and strength of evidence on juror simulation research. Psychology, Crime and Law, 13(2), 139–153. doi:10.1080/10683160500537431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, G., & Comfort, J. C. (1982). Scientific juror selection: Sex as a moderator of demographic and personality predictors of impaneled felony juror behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1052–1063. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.1052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulaik, S. A. (2010). Foundations of factor analysis (2nd ed.). London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, B., & Lecci, L. (1998). Revising the factor structure of the JBS: A method for the empirical validation of theoretical constructs. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 239–256. doi:10.1023/A:1025798204956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narby, D., Cutler, B., & Moran, G. (1993). A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors' perceptions of defendant culpability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 34–42. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakman, J., Van Ameringen, M., Mancini, C., & Farvolden, P. (2003). A confirmatory factor analysis of a self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 149–161. doi:10.1002/jclp.10124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Office of Science & Technology (2005). Science in court (Postnote No. 248). Retrieved from www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_offices/post/pubs2005.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242–258. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189–206. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podlas, K. (2006). ‘The CSI Effect’: Exposing the media myth. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 16, 429–465. Retrieved from http://law.fordham.edu/fordham-intellectual-property-media-and-entertainment-law-journal/iplj.htm
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K., & Hayes, A. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. American Psychologist, 45, 489–493. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.4.489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65–89. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb00997.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, N. J., & Saks, M. J. (2007). The CSI effect: Popular fiction about forensic science affects the public's expectations about real forensic science. Jurimetrics Journal, 47, 357–364. Retrieved from http://www.law.asu.edu
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J., & Skolnick, P. (2004). Effects of prejudicial pretrial publicity from physical and witness evidence on mock jurors' decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02693.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, D., Kim, Y., & Barak, G. (2006). A study of juror expectations and demands concerning scientific evidence: Does the ‘CSI Effect’ exist? Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 9, 331–368. Retrieved from http://www.jetlaw.org/
   Google Scholar
• Skolnick, P., & Shaw, J. (2001). A comparison of eyewitness and physical evidence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 614–630. doi:10.1177/009385480102800504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleath, E., & Woodhams, J. (2011). Perceptions of rape victim blaming. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. L., & Bull, R. (2012). Identifying and measuring juror pre-trial bias for forensic evidence: Development and validation of the Forensic Evidence Evaluation Bias Scale. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 797–815. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.561800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. L., Bull, R., & Holliday, R. (2011). Understanding juror perceptions of forensic evidence: Investigating the impact of case context on perceptions of forensic evidence strength. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 56(2), 409–414. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01671.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taroni, F., Aitken, C., Garbolino, P., & Biedermann, A. (2006). Bayesian networks and probabilistic inference in forensic science: Taroni/Bayesian networks and probabilistic inference in forensic science. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. (2006). Viewing CSI and the threshold of guilt: Managing truth and justice in reality and fiction. The Yale Law Journal, 115, 1050–1085. doi:10.2307/20455645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar