The effects of immediate recall on eyewitness accuracy and susceptibility to misinformation

References

• Brock, P., Fisher, R. P., & Cutler, B. L. (1999). Examining the cognitive interview in a double-test paradigm. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5(1–2), 29–45. doi:10.1080/10683169908414992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centofanti, A. T., & Reece, J. (2006). The cognitive interview and its effect on misleading postevent information. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 669–683. doi:10.1080/10683160600558394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J., & LaPaglia, J. (2011). The dark side of testing memory: Repeated retrieval can enhance eyewitness suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(4), 418–432. doi:10.1037/a0025147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C., Thomas, A. K., & Bulevich, J. B. (2009). Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility: The reversed testing effect. Psychological Science, 20(1), 66–73. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02245.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636. doi:10.1037/h0046408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ebbesen, E. B., & Rienick, C. B. (1998). Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 745–762. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 33(4), 298–307. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2012). Protecting against misleading post-event information with a self-administered interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 568–575. doi:10.1002/acp.2828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K., & Wright, D. B. (2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 215–227. doi:10.1348/1355325041719428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D. (2006). Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 480–485. doi:10.3758/bf03193873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R., Fisher, R., Cohen, G., Holland, H., & Surtes, L. (1986). Eyewitness responses to leading and misleading questions under the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 14(1), 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., & Pansky, A. (2005). Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting over time. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 505–525. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., & Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Social psychology: Goals in interaction (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, S. M., Mather, M., Villa, D., & Morita, S. K. (2001). How events are reviewed matters: Effects of varied focus on eyewitness suggestibility. Memory & Cognition, 29, 940–947. doi:10.3758/BF03195756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12, 361–366. doi:10.1101/lm.94705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(1), 19–31. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLeod, M. D., & Saunders, J. (2008). Retrieval inhibition and memory distortion: Negative consequences of an adaptive process. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 26–30. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00542.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, M., & Roediger, H. L. (2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory and Cognition, 30, 995–1009. doi:10.3758/BF03194318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Zaragoza, M., Clifford, B., & Kidd, L. (2010). Inoculation or antidote? The effects of cognitive interview timing on false memory for forcibly fabricated events. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 105–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudd, K., & Govern, J. (2004). Conformity to misinformation and time delay negatively affect eyewitness confidence and accuracy. North American Journal of Psychology, 6, 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. (1988). Time present and time past. In M. Grunebert, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 2, pp. 545–560). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2006a). Comparing methods of encountering post-event information: The power of co-witness suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1083–1099. doi:10.1002/acp.1261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2006b). Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 181–191. doi:10.1080/10683160512331316334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., Kemp, R. I., & Forgas, J. P. (2009). Co-witnesses, confederates, and conformity: Effects of discussion and delay on eyewitness memory. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16, S112–S124. doi:10.1080/13218710802620380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., Kemp, R. I., & Ng, J. (2011). Combating co-witness contamination: Attempting to decrease the negative effects of discussion on eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz-Alonso, P., & Goodman, G. (2008). Trauma and memory: Effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval. Memory, 16(1), 58–75. doi:10.1080/09658210701363146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory. Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., Meade, M. L., & Bergman, E. T. (2001). Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 365–371. doi:10.3758/BF03196174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, J., & MacLeod, M. D. (2002). New evidence on the suggestibility of memory: The role of retrieval-induced forgetting in misinformation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(2), 127–142. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. L. (1999). The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 54, 182–203. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. S., Bjork, R. A., & Handal, A. (1995). Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness-memory paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 249–253. doi:10.3758/BF03210965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. S., Garven, S., & Wood, J. M. (1997). Co-witness information can have immediate effects on eyewitness memory reports. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 503–523. doi:10.1023/A:1024875723399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skagerberg, E. M., & Wright, D. B. (2008). The prevalence of co-witnesses and co-witness discussions in real eyewitnesses. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 513–521. doi:10.1080/10683160801948980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, R., & Hayne, H. (2001). The effect of postevent information on adults' eyewitness reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 249–263. doi:10.1002/acp.700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Watkins, M. J. (1974). On negative transfer: Effects of testing one list on the recall of another. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 13, 181–193. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80043-5
   Google Scholar
• Wilford, M. M., Chan, J. C., & Tuhn, S. J. (2009). The effects of recall on eyewitness suggestibility to central and peripheral misinformation. Paper presented at the 8th biennial conference of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Kyoto.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., Mathews, S. A., & Skagerberg, E. M. (2005). Social recognition memory: The effect of other people's responses for previously seen and unseen items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 200–209. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.11.3.200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D., Self, G., & Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 189–202. doi:10.1348/000712600161781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarmey, A. D. (1992). The effects of dyadic discussion on earwitness recall. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 250–263. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1302_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaragoza, M. S., Payment, K. E., Ackil, J. K., Drivdahl, S. B., & Beck, M. (2001). Interviewing witnesses: Forced confabulation and confirmatory feedback increase false memories. Psychological Science, 12, 473–477. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar