Press articles and influence processes: the different effects of incriminating information and crime story information on judgments of guilt

References

• ABA. (2007). Criminal justice section standards. Retrieved from www.abanet.org/crimjust/standards/fairtrial_blk.html
   Google Scholar
• Arbuthnot, J., Myers, B., & Leach, J. (2002). Linking juror prejudgment and pretrial publicity knowledge: Some methodological considerations. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 20(3), 53–71.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (1978). Processing temporal relationships in simple stories: Effects of input sequence. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 559–572. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90337-7
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1985). Vivid persuasion in the courtroom. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 659–664. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4906_16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cissna, K. N., Garvin, B. J., & Kennedy, C. W. (1990). Reliability in coding social interaction: A study of confirmation. Communication Reports, 3(2), 58–69. doi:10.1080/08934219009367505
   Google Scholar
• Costantini, E., & King, J. (1980–1981). The partial juror: Correlates and causes of prejudgment. Law and Society Review, 50(1), 9–39. doi:10.2307/3053221
   Google Scholar
• De la Haye, Y. (2005). Journalisme, mode d'emploi. Paris: L'Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Feigenson, N., & Park, J. (2006). Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: A research review. Law and Human Behavior, 30(2), 143–161. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9026-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulero, S. M. (2002). Afterword: The past, present, and future of applied pretrial publicity research. Law and Human Behavior, 26(1), 127–133. doi:10.1023/A:1013885309899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaziano, C. (1988). How credible is the credibility crisis? Journalism Quarterly, 65, 267–278. doi:10.1177/107769908806500202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. H., Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Rage and reason: The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 781–795. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<781::AID-EJSP960>3.0.CO;2-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., Garst, J., & Brock, T. C. (2004). The power of fiction: Determinants and boundaries. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 161–176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hoiberg, B. C., & Stires, L. K. (1973). The effect of several types of pretrial publicity on the guilt attributions of simulated jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 267–275. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1973.tb02802.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honess, T. M., Charman, E. A., & Levi, M. M. (2003). Factual and affective/evaluative recall of pretrial publicity: Their relative influence on juror reasoning and verdict in a simulated fraud trial. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1404–1416. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01955.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Memon, A., & McGeorge, P. (2004). Understanding pretrial publicity: Predecisional distortion of evidence by Mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 111–119. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.10.2.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntley, J. E., & Costanzo, M. (2003). Sexual harassment stories: Testing a story-mediated model of juror decision-making in civil litigation. Law and Human Behavior, 27(1), 29–51. doi:10.1023/A:1021674811225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrich, D. J., Mullin, C., & Linz, D. (1995). Measuring the extent of prejudicial pretrial publicity in major American newspapers: A content analysis. Journal of Communication, 45(3), 94–117. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00745.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovera, M. (2002). The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: An examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms. Law and Human Behavior, 26(1), 43–72. doi:10.1023/A:1013829224920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, G. P., Kerr, N. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 409–438. doi:10.1007/BF01044220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepastourel, N., & Testé, B. (2004). L'influence médiatique sur les jugements judiciaires: rôle du style d'écriture dans la formation des jugements [Media's influence on judiciary judgments: Impact of writing style on judgment elaboration]. Psychologie Française, 49, 373–388. doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2004.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Lepastourel, N., & Testé, B. (2011). Attentes langagières et réception de l'information médiatique judiciaire [Language expectancy and reception of judicial news]. L'année Psychologique, 111(1), 41–68. doi:10.4074/S0003503311001023
   Google Scholar
• Linz, D., & Penrod, S. (1992). Exploring the first and sixth amendments: Pretrial publicity and jury decision-making. In D. K. Kagehiro & W. S. Laufer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and law (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. Davidson, H. Goldsmith, & K. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of affective science (pp. 619–642). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manchec, K., Somat, A., & Vazel, M.-A. (1998). L'affaire MC Ruby: l'influence des médias dans le déroulement d'un procès “exemplaire” [The MC Ruby case: The impact of media coverage on the proceedings of an exemplary lawsuit]. Droits et Cultures, 36(2), 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, G., & Cutler, B. L. (1991). The prejudicial impact of pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 345–367. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogloff, J. P., & Vidmar, N. (1994). The impact of pretrial publicity on jurors: A study to compare the relative effects of television and print media in a child sex abuse case. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 507–525. doi:10.1007/BF01499171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, A. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1994). The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 453–469. doi:10.1007/BF01499050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision-making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 521–533. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189–206. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). The story model for juror decision making. In R. Hastie (Ed.), Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making (pp. 192–221). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511752896.010
   Google Scholar
• Ruva, C. L., Guenther, C. C., & Yarbrough, A. (2011). Positive and negative pretrial publicity: The roles of impression formation, emotion, and predecisional distortion. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 511–534. doi:10.1177/0093854811400823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruva, C. L., & McEvoy, C. (2008). Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision-making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 226–235. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, R. J. (1966). Murder, juries and the press. Trans-Action, (May–June), 64–65.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, R. J., & Eimermann, T. (1971). The jury finds no guilty: Another look at the media influence on the jury. Journalism Quarterly, 48, 343–344.
   Google Scholar
• Spiecker, S. C., & Worthington, D. L. (2003). The influence of opening statement/closing argument organizational strategy on juror verdict and damage awards. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 437–456. doi:10.1023/A:1024041201605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay, N., Besirevic, J., Fulero, S. M., & Jimenez-Lorente, B. (1999). The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts: A meta-analytic review. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 219–235. doi:10.1023/A:1022325019080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, C. A., & Penrod, S. D. (1997). Pretrial publicity: The media, the law, and common sense. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 428–460. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, C. A., & Penrod, S. D. (2005). Pretrial publicity and its influence on juror decision making. In N. Brewer, K. D. Williams, N. Brewer, & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective (pp. 254–275). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Studebaker, C. A., Robbennolt, J. K., Pathak-Sharma, M. K., & Penrod, S. D. (2000). Assessing pretrial publicity effects: Integrating content analytic results. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 317–336. doi:10.1023/A:1005536204923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankard, J. W., Middleton, K., & Rimmer, T. (1979). Compliance with American bar association for fair trial-free press guidelines. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 464–468. doi:10.1177/107769907905600302
   Google Scholar
• Tans, M., & Chaffee, S. (1966). Pretrial publicity and juror prejudice. Journalism Quarterly, 43, 647–654. doi:10.1177/107769906604300403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen's notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77, 660–679. doi:10.1086/225193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, J. F., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2001). Narrative structure, information certainty, emotional content, and gender as factors in a pseudo jury decision-making task. Discourse Processes, 32, 215–243. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. R., & Bornstein, B. H. (1998). Methodological considerations in pretrial publicity research: Is the medium the message? Law and Human Behavior, 22, 585–597. doi:10.1023/A:1025743614951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. W., & Pennington, N. (2000). Memory and judgment: Availability versus explanation-based accounts. Memory & Cognition, 28, 624–634. doi:10.3758/BF03201252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar