The attribution of responsibility in cases of stalking

References

• Aguiar, P., Vala, J., Correia, I., & Pereira, C. (2008). Justice in our world and in that of others: Belief in a just world and reactions to victims. Social Justice Research, 21, 50–68. doi:10.1007/s11211-007-0059-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Personal safety survey, Australia (2005 Reissue, 4906.0). Melbourne: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, K., Catalano, S., Rand, M., & Rose, K. (2009). Stalking victimization in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. T., Kuriloff, P. J., & Lottes, I. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification, and students' social perceptions of rape victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1719–1734. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01571.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, J. S. (1991). Perceptions of date and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs. Sex Roles, 24, 291–307. doi:10.1007/BF00288303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, J. S., & McGrail, C. A. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for date and stranger rape. Sex Roles, 21, 273–286. doi:10.1007/BF00289907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd, T., & Mattinson, J. (2000). Stalking: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey (Research Findings No. 129). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 91–103. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.7.2.91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cass, A. I. (2011). Defining stalking: The influence of legal factors, extralegal factors, and particular actions on judgments of college students. Western Criminology Review, 12, 1–14. Retrieved from http://wcr.sonoma.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Correia, I., Vala, J., & Aguiar, P. (2007). Victim's innocence, social categorization, and the threat to the belief in a just world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 31–38. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, A. (2006). Domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the 2004/05 British Crime Survey (Home Office Online Report 12/06). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Frese, B., Moya, M., & Megías, J. L. (2004). Social perception of rape: How rape myth acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 143–161. doi:10.1177/0886260503260245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00072-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, A. R., & Harrower, J. (2009). Understanding attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 63–81. doi:10.1080/13552600802641649
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (2000). An evaluation of the use and effectiveness of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (Home Office Research Study 203). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, A., & Taplin, J. (1998). Anticipated responses to stalking: Effect of threat and target-stalker relationship. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 5, 139–46. doi:10.1080/13218719809524927
   Google Scholar
• Hollway, W. (1984). Gender differences and the production of subjectivity. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject (pp. 227–263). London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Memon, A., & McGeorge, P. (2004). Understanding pretrial publicity: Predecisional distortion of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 111–119. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.10.2.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, D. V., & Farnham, F. R. (2003). Stalking and serious violence. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31, 432–439. Retrieved from http://www.jaapl.org/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1970). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, M. J. (1997). What does belief in a just world protect us from: The dread of death or the fear of underserved suffering? Psychological Enquiry, 8, 29–32. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0801_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, M. J. (2003). The justice motive: Where social psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 388–399. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210. doi:10.1037/h0023562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwan, T. E., Mullen, P. E., MacKenzie, R. D., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2009). Violence in stalking situations. Psychological Medicine, 39, 1469–1478. doi:10.1017/S0033291708004996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. M., Huss, M. T., & Palarea, R. E. (2011). A pattern of violence: Analyzing the relationship between intimate partner violence and stalking. Violence and Victims, 26, 103–115. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.26.1.103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2011, July). Violent and sexual crime. In R. Chaplin, J. Flatley, & K. Smith (Eds.), Crimes in England and Wales 2010/11: Findings from the British Crime Survey and police recorded crime (2nd ed., pp. 56–72). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, A., & Easteal, P. (1999). The ‘domestic’ in stalking: Policing domestic stalking in the Australian Capital Territory. Alternative Law Journal, 24, 165–169. Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189–206. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, L., Quirk, R., Rosenfeld, B., & O'Connor, M. (2004). Is it stalking? Perceptions of stalking among college undergraduates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 73–96. doi:10.1177/0093854803259251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protection from Harassment Act, England and Wales. (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, B., & Lewis, C. (2005). Assessing violence risk in stalking cases: A regression tree approach. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 343–357. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-3318-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. (2008). Conduct severity, the perpetrator–target relationship and perceptions of stalking ( Unpublished master's thesis). University of Leicester, Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J., Lloyd, R., & Gavin, J. (2010). The influence of prior relationship on perceptions of stalking in the United Kingdom and Australia. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1185–1194. doi:10.1177/0093854810378812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J., Rajakaruna, N., & Sheridan, L. (2013). Framing and perceptions of stalking: The influence of conduct severity and the perpetrator-target relationship. Psychology, Crime & Law. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2013.770856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J., & Sheridan, L. (2011). ‘Reasonable’ perceptions of stalking: The influence of conduct severity and the perpetrator–target relationship. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 331–343. doi:10.1080/10683160903203961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. E., & Sulzer, J. L. (1964). An empirical test of Heider's levels in attribution of responsibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 39–46. doi:10.1037/h0040051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, L., & Davies, G. M. (2001). Violence and the prior victim–stalker relationship. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 11, 102–116. doi:10.1002/cbm.375
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheridan, L., Gillett, R., Davies, G. M., Blaauw, E., & Patel, D. (2003). ‘There's no smoke without fire’: Are male ex-partners perceived as more ‘entitled’ to stalk than stranger or acquaintance stalkers? British Journal of Psychology, 1, 87–98. doi:10.1348/000712603762842129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, L., & Roberts, K. (2011). Key questions to consider in stalking cases. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29, 255–270. doi:10.1002/bsl.966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokols, D., & Schopler, J. (1973). Reactions to victims under conditions of situational detachment: The effects of responsibility, severity, and expected future interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 199–209. doi:10.1037/h0033966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M., & Dennison, S. M. (2008). Defining relational stalking in research: Understanding sample composition in relation to repetition and duration of harassment. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 15, 482–499. doi:10.1080/13218710802389432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar