Young children's responses to cross-examination style questioning: the effects of delay and subsequent questioning

References

• Ackil, J. K., & Zaragoza, M. S. (1995). Developmental differences in eyewitness suggestibility and memory for source. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60(1), 57–83. doi:10.1006/jecp.1995.1031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackil, J. K., & Zaragoza, M. S. (1998). Memorial consequences of forced confabulation: Age differences in susceptibility to false memories. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1358–1372. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldridge, M., Timmins, K., & Wood, J. (1997). Children's understanding of legal terminology: Judges get money at pet shows, don't they? Child Abuse Review, 6(2), 141–146. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0852(199705)6:2<141::AID-CAR308>3.0.CO;2-B
   Google Scholar
• Almerigogna, J., Ost, J., Bull, R., & Akehurst, L. (2007). A state of high anxiety: How non-supportive interviewers can increase the suggestibility of child witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 963–974. doi:10.1002/acp.1311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker-Ward, L., Hess, T. M., & Flannagan, D. A. (1990). The effects of involvement on children's memory for events. Cognitive Development, 5(1), 55–69. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(90)90012-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekerian, D. A., & Bowers, J. M. (1983). Eyewitness testimony: Were we misled? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 139–145. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorklund, D. F., Bjorklund, B. R., Brown, R. D., & Cassel, W. S. (1998). Children's susceptibility to repeated questions: How misinformation changes children's answers and their minds. Applied Developmental Science, 2(2), 99–111. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0202_4
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, B. L., Goodman, G. S., Schwartz-Kenney, B. M., & Thomas, S. N. (2002). Understanding children's use of secrecy in the context of eyewitness reports. Law and Human Behavior, 26(3), 285–313. doi:10.1023/A:1015324304975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., Kingma, J., & Howe, M. L. (1985). On the development of forgetting. Child Development, 56, 1103–1119. doi:10.2307/1130226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, M., & Brennan, R. (1988). Strange language: Child victims under cross-examination. Wagga Wagga: Riverina Murray Institute of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. A., Pipe, M.-E., Lewis, C., Lamb, M. E., & Orbach, Y. (2007). Supportive or suggestive: Do human figure drawings help 5- to 7-year-old children to report touch? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(1), 33–42. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.1.33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, R., & Davies, G. (1996). The effect of child witness research on legislation in Great Britain. In G. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.), International perspectives on child abuse and children's testimony: Psychological research and law (pp. 96–113). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore, J., & Trimboli, L. (2005). An evaluation of the NSW child sexual assault specialist jurisdiction pilot. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Attorney-General's Department.
   Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., & Toglia, M. P. (1987). Suggestibility of children's memory: Psycholegal implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(1), 38–49. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.116.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
   Google Scholar
• Davies, E., Henderson, E., & Seymour, F. W. (1997). In reply to: The interests of justice? The cross-examination of child complainants of sexual abuse in criminal proceedings. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, and Law, 4, 217–229. doi:10.1080/13218719709524912
   Google Scholar
• Davies, E., & Seymour, F. W. (1998). Questioning child complainants of sexual abuse: Analysis of criminal court transcripts in New Zealand. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 5(1), 47–61. doi:10.1080/13218719809524919
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S. L., & Bottoms, B. L. (2002). Effects of social support on children's eyewitness reports: A test of the underlying mechanism. Law and Human Behavior, 26(2), 185–215. doi:10.1023/A:1014692009941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwood, C., & Patton, W. (2002). The experiences of child complainants of sexual abuse in the criminal justice system. Griffith, ACT: Criminology Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Eltringham, S., & Aldridge, J. (2000). The extent of children's knowledge of court as estimated by guardians ad litem. Child Abuse Review, 9, 275–286. doi:10.1002/1099-0852(200007/08)9:4<275::AID-CAR618>3.0.CO;2-W
   Google Scholar
• Finnilä, K., Mahlberg, N., Santtila, P., Sandnabba, K., & Niemi, P. (2003). Validity of a test of children's suggestibility for predicting responses to two interview situations differing in their degree of suggestiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85(1), 32–49. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00025-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Schreiber, N. (2007). Interview protocols to improve eyewitness memory. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology. Volume 1: Memory for events (pp. 53–80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fivush, R., & Hamond, N. R. (1989). Time and again: Effects of repetition and retention interval on 2 year olds' event recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 259–273. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(89)90032-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D.B. (2006). Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 480–485. doi:10.3758/BF03193873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garven, S., Wood, J. M., & Malpass, R. S. (2000). Allegations of wrongdoing: The effects of reinforcement on children's mundane and fantastic claims. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 38–49. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garven, S., Wood, J. M., Malpass, R. S., & Shaw, J. S. (1998). More than suggestion: The effect of interviewing techniques from the McMartin Preschool case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 347–359. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Cohen, G., Holland, H., & Surtes, L. (1986). Eyewitness responses to leading and misleading questions under the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 14, 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, J. W., Gopnik, A., & Heyman, G. D. (2002). Source monitoring reduces the suggestibility of preschool children. Psychological Science, 13, 288–291. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobbo, C. (2000). Assessing the effects of misinformation on children's recall: how and when makes a difference. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 163–182. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200003/04)14:2<163::AID-ACP630>3.0.CO;2-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, G. S., Hirschman, J. E., Hepps, D., & Rudy, L. (1991). Children's memory for stressful events. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37, 109–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, G. S., Taub, E. P., Jones, D. H. P., England, P., Port, L. K., Rudy, L., & Prado, L. (1992). Testifying in the criminal court: Emotional effects on child sexual assault victims. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(5), 1–142. doi:10.2307/1166127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, J., & Hayne, H. (1999). Drawing facilitates children's verbal reports after long delays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 265–283. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.5.3.265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J., Hayne, H., & Poole, A. (2006). The use of drawing in interviews with children: A potential pitfall. In J. Marrow (Ed.), Focus on child psychology research (pp. 119–144). New York, NY: Nova Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlyn, B., Phelps, A., Turtle, J., & Sattar, G. (2004). Are special measures working? Evidence from surveys of vulnerable and intimidated witnesses. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hanba, J. M., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2007). Interviewer feedback in repeated interviews involving forced confabulation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 433–455. doi:10.1002/acp.1286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, K., Davies, E., Henderson, E., Crothers, C., & Rotherham, C. (2010). Child witnesses in the New Zealand Criminal Courts: A review of practice and implications for policy. Auckland: Institute of Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. (2002). Persuading and controlling: The theory of cross-examination in relation to children. In H. L. Westcott, G. M. Davies, & R. Bull (Eds.), Children's testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (pp. 279–294). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, M. L., Crossman, A. M., & Ceci, S. J. (1997). “Are false memories permanent?”: An investigation of the long-term effects of source misattributions. Consciousness and Cognition, 6, 482–490. doi:10.1006/ccog.1997.0316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, M. C., & Baker-Ward, L. (1999). Preschoolers' suggestibility: Effects of developmentally appropriate language and interviewer supportiveness. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20, 407–429. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00022-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, F., & Zajac, R. (2014). The effect of age and reminders on witnesses' responses to cross-examination-style questioning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(1), 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Jack, F., Zydervelt, S., & Zajac, R. (2014). Are co-witnesses special? Comparing the influence of co-witness and interviewer misinformation on eyewitness reports. Memory, 22, 243–255. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.778291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. H., & Pipe, M.-E. (2002). How quickly do children forget events? A systematic study of children's event reports as a function of delay. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 755–768. doi:10.1002/acp.826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampinen, J. M., & Smith, V. L. (1995). The incredible (and sometimes incredulous) child witness: Child eyewitnesses' sensitivity to source credibility cues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 621–627. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rooy, D., Pipe, M.-E., & Murray, J. E. (2005). Reminiscence and hypermnesia in children's eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 235–254. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lash, B. (1995). Time taken to process sexual offence cases through the courts. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Leichtman, M. D., & Ceci, S. J. (1995). The effects of stereotypes and suggestions on preschoolers' reports. Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 568–578. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1987). Children on the witness stand: A communication/persuasion analysis of jurors' reactions to child witnesses. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 155–177). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1989). Reactions to child (versus adult) eyewitnesses: The influence of jurors' preconceptions and witness behavior. Law and Human Behavior, 13(2), 103–132. doi:10.1007/BF01055919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, L. J., Burgess, S. L., & Laney, C. (2008). Effects of discrete emotions on young children's suggestibility. Developmental Psychology, 44, 681–694. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585–589. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3
   Google Scholar
• London, K., Bruck, M., & Melnyk, L. (2009). Post-event information affects children's autobiographical memory after one year. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 344–355. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9147-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, T. D., Malloy, L. C., Quas, J. A., & Talwar, V. A. (2008). Coaching, truth induction, and young maltreated children's false allegations and false denials. Child Development, 79, 914–929. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01167.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marche, T. A. (1999). Memory strength affects reporting of misinformation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 554–567.
   Google Scholar
• Marche, T. A., & Howe, M. L. (1995). Preschoolers report misinformation despite accurate memory. Developmental Psychology, 31, 554–567. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieson, D. L. (1997). Cross on evidence (6th ed.). Wellington: Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Melnyk, L., & Bruck, M. (2004). Timing moderates the effects of repeated suggestive interviewing on children's eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 613–631. doi:10.1002/acp.1013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Zaragoza, M., Clifford, B. R., & Kidd, L. (2010). Inoculation or antidote? The effects of cognitive interview timing on false memory for forcibly fabricated events. Law and Human Behavior, 34(2), 105–117. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9172-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K., Dorgan, K., & Hayne, H. (2013). Body maps do not facilitate older children's report of touch. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 51–55. doi:10.1111/sjop.12000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathanson, R., & Saywitz, K. (2003). The effects of courtroom context on children's memory and anxiety. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 31, 67–98.
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, P. A., & Siegal, M. (1997). Explicitly questioning the nature of suggestibility in preschoolers' memory and retention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 67, 185–203. doi:10.1006/jecp.1997.2398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, S., & Zajac, R. (2013a). Preparing children for cross-examination: How does intervention timing influence efficacy? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(3), 307–320. doi:10.1037/a0031538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S., & Zajac, R. (2013b). The role of repeated interviewing in children's responses to cross-examination-style questioning. British Journal of Psychology, 104(1), 14–38. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02096.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, N. W., McAuliff, B. D., Tam, P., Claycomb, L., Dostal, C., & Flanagan, C. (1995). When lawyers question children. Is justice served? Law and Human Behavior, 19, 609–629. doi:10.1007/BF01499377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, W. W., & Nunez, N. (1999). Complex language and comprehension monitoring: Teaching child witnesses to recognize linguistic confusion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 661–669. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Bell, M. (1996). Children's memory for traumatic injury. Child Development, 67(6), 3045–3070. doi:10.2307/1131766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., Parsons, T., & Dean, M. (2004). Providing misleading and reinstatement information a year after it happened: Effects on long-term memory. Memory, 12(1), 1–13. doi:10.1080/09658210344000468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Whalen, N. (2001). Five years later: children's memory for medical emergencies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(7), S7–S24. doi:10.1002/acp.832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezdek, K., & Roe, C. (1995). The effect of memory trace on suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60(1), 116–128. doi:10.1006/jecp.1995.1034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipe, M.-E., Gee, S., Wilson, J. C., & Egerton, J. M. (1999). Children's recall 1 or 2 years after an event. Developmental Psychology, 35, 781–789. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipe, M.-E., & Henaghan, M. (1996). Accommodating children's testimony: Legal reforms in New Zealand. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23(2), 377–401. doi:10.1177/0093854896023002008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipe, M.-E., Sutherland, R., Webster, N., Jones, C., & La Rooy, D. (2004). Do early interviews affect children's long-term recall? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 823–839. doi:10.1002/acp.1053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plotnikoff, J., & Woolfson, R. (2007). Evaluation of young witness support: Examining the impact on witnesses and the criminal justice system. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, D. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (2001). Children's eyewitness reports after exposure to misinformation from parents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(1), 27–50. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.7.1.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M. B., & Roberts, K. P. (2002). The effect of repeated experience on children's suggestibility across two question types. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(4), 367–386. doi:10.1002/acp.801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righarts, S., O’Neill, S., & Zajac, R. (2013). Addressing the negative effect of cross-examination questioning on children's accuracy: Can we intervene? Law and Human Behavior, 37(5), 354–365. doi:10.1037/lhb0000042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. P., & Powell, M. B. (2006). The consistency of false suggestions moderates children's reports of a single instance of a repeated event: Predicting increases and decreases in suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(1), 68–89. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roebers, C. M., Schwarz, S., & Neumann, R. (2005). Social influence and children's event recall and suggestibility. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2(1), 47–69. doi:10.1080/17405620444000274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saywitz, K. J., Goodman, G. S., Nicholas, E., & Moan, S. F. (1991). Children's memories of a physical examination involving genital touch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 682–691. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. R., & Purdy, T. L. (2005). Suggestibility and source monitoring errors: blame the interview style, interviewer consistency, and the child's personality. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(4), 489–506. doi:10.1002/acp.1093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrimpton, S., Oates, K., & Hayes, S. (1996). The child witness and legal reforms in Australia. In G. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.), International perspectives on child abuse and children's testimony: Psychological research and law (pp. 132–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Talwar, V., Lee, K., Bala, N., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2004). Children's lie-telling to conceal a parent's transgression: Legal implications. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 411–435. doi:10.1023/B:LAHU.0000039333.51399.f6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thierry, K. L., & Spence, M. J. (2002). Source-monitoring training facilitates preschoolers' eyewitness memory performance. Developmental Psychology, 38, 428–437. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.3.428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thierry, K. L., & Spence, M. J. (2004). A real-life event enhances the accuracy of preschoolers' recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 297–309. doi:10.1002/acp.965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. K., Bulevich, J. B., & Loftus, E. F. (2003). Exploring the role of repetition and sensory elaboration in the imagination inflation effect. Memory & Cognition, 31, 630–640. doi:10.3758/BF03196103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, W. C., Clarke-Stewart, K. A., & Lepore, S. J. (1997). What did the janitor do? Suggestive interviewing and the accuracy of children's accounts. Law and Human Behavior, 21(4), 405–426. doi:10.1023/A:1024859219764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, A. (2002). New measures and new challenges: Children's experiences of the court process. In H. L. Westcott, G. M. Davies, & R. Bull (Eds.), Children's testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (pp. 219–232). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A. G. (1993). Questioning young children in court: A linguistic case study. Law and Human Behavior, 17(1), 59–81. doi:10.1007/BF01044537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, A. R., & Lane, P. (1995). Effects of timing and type of questioning on eyewitness accuracy and suggestibility. In M. S. Zaragoza, J. R. Graham, G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y. S. Ben-Porath (Eds.), Memory and testimony in the child witness (pp. 44–60). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Waterman, A. H., Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (2000). Do children try to answer nonsensical questions? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(2), 211–225. doi:10.1348/026151000165652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterman, A. H., Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (2004). Indicating when you do not know the answer: The effect of question format and interviewer knowledge on children's ‘don't know’ responses. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 335–348. doi:10.1348/0261510041552710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westcott, H. L., & Page, M. (2002). Cross-examination, sexual abuse and child witness identity. Child Abuse Review, 11(3), 137–152. doi:10.1002/car.739
   Google Scholar
• Wigmore, J. H. (1974). Evidence in trials at common law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Zajac, R., & Cannan, P. (2009). Cross-examination of sexual assault complainants: A developmental comparison. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16(suppl 1), S36–S54. doi:10.1080/13218710802620448
   Google Scholar
• Zajac, R., Gross, J., & Hayne, H. (2003). Asked and answered: Questioning children in the courtroom. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 10, 199–209. doi:10.1375/pplt.2003.10.1.199
   Google Scholar
• Zajac, R., & Hayne, H. (2003). I don't think that's what really happened: The effect of cross-examination on the accuracy of children's reports. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 187–195. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.9.3.187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, R., & Hayne, H. (2006). The negative effect of cross-examination style questioning on children's accuracy: Older children are not immune. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(1), 3–16. doi:10.1002/acp.1169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, R., Jury, E., & O’Neill, S. (2009). The role of psychosocial factors in young children's responses to cross-examination style questioning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(7), 918–935. doi:10.1002/acp.1536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar