Automated insights: verbal cues to deception in real-life high-stakes lies

References

• Baddeley, J. L., Daniel, G. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). How Henry Hellyer’s use of language foretold his suicide. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 32, 288–292. doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the guilty knowledge test: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131–151. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blandon-Gitlin, I., Pezdek, K., Lindsay, D. S., & Hagen, L. (2009). Criteria-based content analysis of true and suggested accounts of events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 901–917. doi:10.1002/acp.1504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, G. D., & Lee, A. Y. (2005). Language of lies in prison: Linguistic classification of prisoners’ truthful and deceptive natural language. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 313–329. doi:10.1002/acp.1087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell, K. (2007). Assessment criteria indicative of deception (ACID): An integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 4, 167–180. doi:10.1002/jip.73
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva, A. L., & Dennick, R. (2010). Corpus analysis of problem-based learning transcripts: An exploratory study. Medical Education, 44, 280–288. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03575.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979–995. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elntib, S., Wagstaff, G. F., & Wheatcroft, J. M. (2014). The role of account length in detecting deception in written and orally produced autobiographical accounts using reality monitoring. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. doi:10.1002/jip.1420
   Google Scholar
• Gould, P. (2001, December 12). Damning evidence that caught a killer. BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/England/1670191.stm
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, J. T., Curry, L. E., Goorha, S., & Woodworth, M. (2008). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Processes, 45(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/01638530701739181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, J., & Woodworth, M. (2013). An “Eye” for an “I”: The challenges and opportunities for spotting credibility in a digital world. In B. S. Cooper, D. Griesel, & M. Ternes (Eds.), Applied issues in investigative interviewing, eyewitness memory, and credibility assessment (pp. 325–340). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, J. T., Woodworth, M. T., & Porter, S. (2013). Hungry like the wolf: A word‐pattern analysis of the language of psychopaths. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18(1), 102–114. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02025.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartlepool Mail (2000, December 4). Killer Alderton out of jail after six years. Retrieved from http://www.hartlepoolmail.co.uk/news/local/killer-alderton-out-of-jail-after-six-years-1-991512
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLaren, V. V. (2001). A quantitative review of the guilty knowledge test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 674–683. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. L., Groom, C. J., Handelman, L. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45, 211–236. doi:10.1080/01638530802073712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665–675. doi:10.1177/0146167203029005010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hair, D., & Cody, M. J. (1987). Gender and vocal stress differences during truthful and deceptive information sequences. Human Relations, 40(1), 1–13. doi:10.1177/001872678704000101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–577. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2010). The truth about lies: What works in detecting high-stakes deception? Legal and Criminal Psychology, 15, 57–75. doi:10.1348/135532509X4331SI
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., & Woodworth, M. (2006). Psychopathy and aggression. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 481–494). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, D. C., & Esplin, P. W. (1991). Statement validity assessment: Interview procedures and content analysis of children’s statements of sexual abuse. Behavioral Assessment, 12, 265–291.
   Google Scholar
• Rayson, P. (2003). Matrix: A statistical method and software tool for linguistic analysis through corpus comparison (Doctoral thesis). Lancaster University, Lancaster. Retrieved from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/wmatrix/#ref
   Google Scholar
• Rayson, P. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13, 519–549. doi:10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray
   Google Scholar
• Schimel, J., Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., O'Mahen, H., & Arndt, J. (2000). Running from the shadow: Psychological distancing from others to deny characteristics people fear in themselves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 446–462. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373–397. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199710)11:5<373::AID-ACP461>3.0.CO;2-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steller, M., & Kohnken, G. (1989). Criteria-based content analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217–245). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54. doi:10.1177/0261927X09351676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Brinke, L., & Porter, S. (2012). Cry me a river: Identifying the behavioral consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 469–477. doi:10.1037/h0093929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Brinke, L., Porter, S., & Baker, A. (2012). Darwin the detective: Observable facial muscle contractions reveal emotional high-stakes lies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 411–416. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, J. M., & Feldman, R. S. (2004). Truth, lies, and self-presentation: How gender and anticipated future interaction relate to deceptive behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2602–2615. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01994.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar, G., Arciuli, J., & Mallard, D. (2012). Use of “um” in the deceptive speech of a convicted murderer. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 83–95. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3–41. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004a). Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults. Human Communication Research, 30, 8–41. doi:10.1093/hcr/30.1.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004b). Let me inform you how to tell a convincing story: CBCA and reality monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching, and deception. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36(2), 113–126. doi:10.1037/h0087222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K. P., & Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 239–263. doi:10.1023/A:1006610329284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. B. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89–121. doi:10.1177/1529100610390861
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001). Who killed my relative? Police Officers’ ability to detect real-life high-stake lies. Psychology, Crime & Law, 7(2), 119–132. doi:10.1080/10683160108401791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 499–518. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9066-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2013). Spatial and temporal details in intentions: A cue to detecting deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 101–106. doi:10.1002/acp.2878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright Whelan, C., Wagstaff, G. F., & Wheatcroft, J. M. (2013). High-stakes lies: Verbal and nonverbal cues to deception in public appeals for help with missing or murdered relatives. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21, 523–537. doi:10.1080/13218719.2013.839931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar