Understanding dynamic risk factors for violence

References

• Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A. (1989). Recidivism is predictable and can be influenced: Using risk assessments to reduce recidivism. Forum on Corrections Research, Risk Assessment and Prediction, 1(2), 11–17. Retrieved from http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/pblct/forum/special/a1e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Matthew Bender.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, G. D., Wakeling, H., Mandeville-Norden, R., & Rakestrow, J. (2013). Does change in psychometric test scores tell us anything about risk of reconviction in sexual offenders? Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(1), 85–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, A. R., & Ford, H. (2006). The relationship between risk, deviance, treatment outcome and sexual reconviction in a sample of child sexual abusers completing residential treatment for their offending. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(6), 685–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beggs, S. (2010). Within-treatment outcome among sexual offenders: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(5), 369–379. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2010.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, A. J. E. (2013). Dynamic risk factors in violence risk assessment: A multiple time-point evaluation of the HCR-20 and START. (Master of Arts), Simon Fraser University, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, A. J. E., & Douglas, K. S. (2011). APLS Undergraduate Paper Award (First Place): The Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-Version 3: The inclusion of idiographic relevance ratings in violence risk assessment. Invited poster presented at the annual convention of the American-Psychology Law Society, Miami, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, D. J., Hart, S. D., Logan, C., & Michie, C. (2012). Explicating the construct of psychopathy: Development and validation of a conceptual model, the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP). International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11, 242–252. doi:10.1080/14999013.2012.746759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daffern, M., Howells, K., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2007). What's the point? Towards a methodology for assessing the function of psychiatric inpatient aggression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 101–111. doi:10.1080/14789949.2013.834069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daffern, M., Thomas, S., Lee, S., Huband, N., McCarthy, L., Simpson, K., & Duggan, C. (2013). The impact of treatment on hostile-dominance in forensic psychiatric inpatients: Relationsihps between change in hostile-dominance and recidivism following release from custody. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24(6), 675–687. doi:10.1080/14789949.2013.834069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deffenbacher, J. L., Oetting, E. R., & DiGiuseppe, R. A. (2002). Principles of empirically supported interventions applied to anger management. Counseling Psychologist, 30, 262–280. doi:10.1177/0011000002302004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Guy, L. S., & Hart, S. D. (2009). Psychosis as a risk factor for violence to others: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 135(5), 679–706. doi:10.1037/a0016311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20 ^V3 Historical, Clinical, Risk Management (Version 3): Professional guidelines for evaluating risk of violence. Burnaby: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., & Skeem, J. L. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(3), 347–383. doi:10.1037/1076–8971.11.3.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Strand, S., & Belfrage, H. (June, 2011). Dynamic risk: Evaluating the nature and predictive validity of change on the Clinical and Risk Management scales of the HCR-20. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 345, e4692. doi:10.1136/bmj.e4692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 575–608. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01220.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, F., & Daffern, M. (submitted for publication). Aggressive scripts and violent behaviour: A conceptual framework.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, L. S., & Wilson, C. M. (2006). Empirical support for the HCR-20: An annotated bibliography of the 20 items (1997–2005). Burnaby: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, L. S., Wilson, C. M., Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20 Version 3: Item-by-item summary of violence literature. HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment White Paper Series, #3. Burnaby: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13(2), 105–122. doi:10.1177/107906320101300204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project. (Cat. No.: PS3-1/2007-5), Canada: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ssssng-rsk-sxl-ffndrs/index-eng.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2015). Progress in violence risk assessment and communication: Hypothesis versus evidence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 33(1), 128–145. doi:10.1002/bsl.2157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., & Logan, C. (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. In P. Sturmey & M. McMurran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation (pp. 83–106). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, S. N. (1992). Models of causality in psychopathology. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, R. & Ward, T. (2015). The conceptualization of dynamic risk factors in child sex offenders: An agency model. (Unpublished chapter).
   Google Scholar
• Helmus, L., Hanson, R. K., Babchishin, K. M., & Mann, R. E. (2013). Attitudes supportive of sexual offending predict recidivism: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(1), 34–53. doi:10.1177/1524838012462244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, M. C. (2013). Hostile attribution bias as a dynamic risk factor in civil psychiatric patients and criminal offenders: Change over time and relationship to violence and recidivism. (Doctor of Philosophy), Simon Fraser University, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, M., & de Ruiter, C. (2012). Psychopathic traits and change on indicators of dynamic risk factors during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35(4), 276–288. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, K. (2004). Anger and its links to violent offending. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11(2), 189–196. doi:10.1375/1321871042707278
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. J., Brown, S. L., & Zamble, E. (2010). Predicting criminal recidivism in adult male offenders: Researcher versus parole officer assessment of dynamic risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(8), 860–882. doi:10.1177/0093854810368924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepfisz, G., O'Brien, K., & Daffern, M. (2014). Violent offenders’ within-treatment change in anger, criminal attitudes, and violence risk: Associations with violent recidivism. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(4), 348–362. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.951107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, H., Kazdin, A., Offord, D., Kessler, R., Jensen, P., & Kupfer, D. (1997). Coming to terms with the terms of risk. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 337–343. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830160065009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroner, D. G., & Yessine, A. K. (2013). Changing risk factors that impact recidivism: In search of mechanisms of change. Law and Human Behavior, 37(5), 321–336. doi:10.1037/lhb0000022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K., Olver, M. E., & Wong, S. C. P. (2013). The violence risk scale: Predictive validity and linking changes in risk with violent recidivism in a sample of high-risk offenders with psychopathic traits. Assessment, 20(2), 150–164. doi:10.1177/1073191112441242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, C. (2014). The HCR-20 version 3: A case study in risk formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 172–180. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.906516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton Nicholls, C., & Webster, S. (2014). Sex offender management and dynamic risk: Pilot evaluation of the Active Risk Management System. UK: Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications
   Google Scholar
• Messina, N., Grella, C. E., Cartier, J., & Torres, S. (2010). A randomized experimental study of gender-responsive substance abuse treatment for women in prison. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38, 97–107. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2009.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P. S., Clark Robbins, P., Mulvey, E. P., … Banks, S. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, J. L., & Daffern, M. (2011). Institutional aggression as a predictor of violent recidivism: Implications for parole decision making. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(1), 52–63. doi:10.1080/14999013.2010.550984
   Google Scholar
• Novaco, R. W. (2011). Anger dysregulation: Driver of violent offending. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 22, 650–668. doi:10.1177/0093854810391054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., Kingston, D. A., Nicholaichuk, T. P., & Wong, S. C. (2014). A psychometric examination of treatment change in a multisite sample of treated Canadian federal sexual offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 38(6), 544–559. doi:10.1037/lhb0000086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Tormala, Z. L. (2003). Persuasion and attitude change. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 353–382). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Polaschek, D. L. L. (2006). Violent offender programmes: Concept, theory, and practice. In C. R. Hollin & E. J. Palmer (Eds.), Offending behaviour programmes: Development, application and controversies. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Polaschek, D. L. L. (2012). An appraisal of the risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1), 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02038.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polaschek, D. L. L., & Collie, R. M. (2004). Rehabilitating serious violent adult offenders: An empirical and theoretical stocktake. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(3), 321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serin, R. C., Lloyd, C. D., Helmus, L., Derkzen, D. M., & Luong, D. (2013). Does intra-individual change predict offender recidivism? Searching for the Holy Grail in assessing offender change. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(1), 32–53. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, D. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 139–153. doi:10.1177/107906320201400205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornton, D. (2013). Implications of our developing understanding of risk and protective factors in the treatment of adult male sexual offenders. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 8(3–4), 62–65. doi:10.1037/h0100985
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., Douglas, K. S., & Nijman, H. L. (2014). Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: Predicting reductions in post-discharge community recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 53–61. doi:10.1037/lhb0000089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (2014). The explanation of sexual offending: From single factor theories to integrative pluralism. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20, 130–141. doi:10.1080/13552600.2013.870242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (2015a). Dynamic risk factors and offender rehabilitation: A comparison of the Good Lives Model and the Risk-Need Responsivity Model. (Unpublished chapter).
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (2015b). Detection of dynamic risk factors and correctional practice. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(1), 105–111. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Beech, A. R. (2015). Dynamic risk factors: A theoretical dead-end? Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(2), 100–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S. C., & Gordon, A. (2003). Violence risk scale manual. Canada: Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewen.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Wong, S. C., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 740–767. doi:10.1037/a0020473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar