Challenges for the theory and application of dynamic risk factors

References

• Abel, G. G., Gore, D. K., Holland, C. L., Camp, N., Becker, J. V., & Rather, J. (1989). The measurement of the cognitive distortions in child molesters. Annals of Sex Research, 2, 135–152. doi: 10.1007/BF00851319
   Google Scholar
• Allan, M., Grace, R. C., Rutherford, B., & Hudson, S. M. (2007). Psychometric assessment of dynamic risk factors for child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(4), 347–367. doi:10.1177/107906320701900402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). LSI-R: The Level Of Service Inventory-Revised user's manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Boston: Anderson Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27. doi:10.1177/0011128705281756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., Wormith, J. S., Guzzo, L., Brews, A., Rettinger, J., & Rowe, R. (2011). Sources of variability in estimates of predictive validity: A specification with Level of Service general risk and need. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(5), 413–432. doi:10.1177/0093854811401990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Guzzo, L., Raynor, P., Rowe, R. C., Rettinger, L. J., Brews, A., & Wormith, J. S. (2012). Are the major risk/need factors predictive of both female and male reoffending?: A test with the eight domains of the level of service/case management inventory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(1), 113–133. doi:10.1177/0306624×10395716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, G. D., Wakeling, H., Mandeville-Norden, R., & Rakestrow, J. (2013). Does change in psychometric test scores tell us anything about risk of reconviction in sexual offenders? Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(1), 85–110. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2011.607820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, A. R. (1998). A psychometric typology of child abusers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42(4), 319–339. doi: 10.1177/0306624X9804200405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, A. R., Friendship, C., Erikson, M., & Hanson, R. K. (2002). The relationship between static and dynamic risk factors and reconviction in a sample of U.K. child abusers. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 155–167. doi:10.1177/107906320201400206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beggs, S. M., & Grace, R. C. (2010). Assessment of dynamic risk factors: An independent validation study of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender version. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(2), 234–251. doi:10.1177/1079063210369014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beggs, S. M., & Grace, R. C. (2011). Treatment gain for sexual offenders against children predicts reduced recidivism: A comparative validity study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(2), 182–192. doi:10.1037/a0022900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belknap, J. (2014). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, R., & Barbaree, H. E. (2005). The strength of sexual arousal as a function of the age of the sex offender: Comparisons among pedophiles, hebephiles, and teleiophiles. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17(4), 441–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta, J. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 18–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks Holliday, S., Heilbrun, K., & Fretz, R. (2012). Examining improvements in criminogenic needs: The risk reduction potential of a structured re-entry program. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 30(4), 431–447. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. L., Amand, M. D. S., & Zamble, E. (2009). The dynamic prediction of criminal recidivism: A three-wave prospective study. Law and Human Behavior, 33(1), 25–45. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9139-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. A., French, S., & Gendreau, P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 567–590. doi: 10.1177/0093854809333610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenane, J. L., Brennan, P. K., Steiner, B., & Ellison, J. M. (2015). Racial and ethnic differences in the predictive validity of the Level Of Service Inventory–Revised among prison inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(3), 286–303. doi:10.1177/0093854814548195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997–1003. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colliver, J. A., Conlee, M. J., & Verhulst, S. J. (2012). From test validity to construct validity … and back? Medical Education, 46(4), 366–371. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04194.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craissati, J., & Beech, A. (2003). A review of dynamic variables and their relationship to risk prediction in sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 9(1), 41–55. doi: 10.1080/355260031000137968
   Google Scholar
• Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. G., Thake, J., & Weekes, J. R. (2012). Impression managers: Nice guys or serious criminals? Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), 26–31. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, R. J., & Hart, S. D. (2002). The relative utility of fixed and variable risk factors in discriminating sexual recidivists and nonrecidivists. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 121–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falk, R., & Greenbaum, C. W. (1995). Significance tests die hard: The amazing persistence of a probabilistic misconception. Theory & Psychology, 5(1), 75–98. doi: 10.1177/0959354395051004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., Beech, A. R., & Browne, K. (1999). Comparison of sex offenders to nonoffenders on selected psychological measures. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43(4), 473–491. doi: 10.1177/0306624X99434006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon, T. A., Ward, T., & Collie, R. (2007). Cognitive distortions in child molesters: Theoretical and research developments over the past two decades. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(4), 402–416. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the “unparalleled” measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4), 397–426. doi:10.1177/0093854802029004004
   Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works. Criminology, 34(4), 575–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01220.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiner, L. E., Law, M. A., & Brown, S. L. (2014). Using dynamic factors to predict recidivism among women: A four-wave prospective study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(5), 457–480. doi:10.1177/0093854814553222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haig, B. D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 371–388. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haig, B. D. (2009). Inference to the best explanation: A neglected approach to theory appraisal in psychology. The American Journal of Psychology, 122(2), 219–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haig, B. D. (2012). From construct validity to theory validation. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 10(1–2), 59–62. doi:10.1080/15366367.2012.681975
   Google Scholar
• Haig, B. D. (2013). Detecting psychological phenomena: Taking bottom-up research seriously. The American Journal of Psychology, 126(2), 135–153. doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.2.0135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haig, B. D. (2014). The philosophy of quantitative methods. In The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology: Foundations (pp. 7–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Harris, A., Scott, T., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project. (Report no. 2007–05). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety and Emergency Prepardness Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 6–35. doi:10.1177/0093854800027001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 1–21. doi:10.1037/a0014421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan, R., & Ward, T. (2015). The conceptualization of dynamic risk factors in child sex offenders: An agency model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 250–260. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, M., & de Ruiter, C. (2012). Psychopathic traits and change on indicators of dynamic risk factors during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35, 276–288. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89(3), 552–584. doi: 10.1086/227905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtfreter, K., & Cupp, R. (2007). Gender and risk assessment: The empirical status of the LSI-R for women. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(4), 363–382. doi:10.1177/1043986207309436
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, S. M., Wales, D. S., Bakker, L., & Ward, T. (2002). Dynamic risk factors: The Kia Marama evaluation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 103–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones, N. J., Brown, S. L., & Zamble, E. (2010). Predicting criminal recidivism in adult male offenders: Researcher versus parole officer assessment of dynamic risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(8), 860–882. doi:10.1177/0093854810368924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanterman, J. L., Boyle, D. J., & Ragusa-Salerno, L. M. (2014). Sex offender risk assessment, sources of variation, and the implications of misuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(7), 822–843. doi:10.1177/0093854813515237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2004). Empirical evidence on the importance of training and experience in using the Level Of Service Inventory-Revised. Topics in Community Corrections, 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Loza, W. (2005). Self-Appraisal Questionnaire. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Loza, W., Dhaliwal, G., Kroner, D. G., & Loza-Fanous, A. (2000). Reliability, construct, and concurrent validities of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: A tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(3), 356–374. doi:10.1177/0093854800027003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(2), 191–217. doi:10.1177/1079063210366039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. K., Wiederanders, M., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & Van Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California's Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17(1), 79–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, W., Hamilton, K., & Fernandez, Y. (2001). Empathy deficits and cognitive distortions in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13(2), 123–130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathie, N. L., & Wakeling, H. C. (2010). Assessing socially desirable responding and its impact on self-report measures among sexual offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(3), 215–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. E., Mitchell, M., Kim, B. H., & Hough, L. (2010). Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 450–470. doi:10.1037/a0019216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J. F., & Kroner, D. G. (2006). Impression management and self-report among violent offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(2), 178–192. doi:10.1177/0886260505282288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Justice. (2007). Helping probation and parole officers cope with stress. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/220107.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neidigh, L., & Krop, H. (1992). Cognitive distortions among child sexual offenders. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 18(3), 208–215.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, K. L., & Babchishin, K. M. (2012). Construct validity of Stable-2000 and Stable-2007 scores. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(1), 29–45. doi:10.1177/1079063211404921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ó Ciardha, C., & Gannon, T. A. (2011). The cognitive distortions of child molesters are in need of treatment. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(2), 130–141. doi:10.1080/13552600.2011.580573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odgers, C. L., Moretti, M. M., & Reppucci, N. D. (2005). Examining the science and practice of violence risk assessment with female adolescents. Law and Human Behavior, 29(1), 7–27. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-1397-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., Beggs Christofferson, S. M., Grace, R. C., & Wong, S. C. P. (2014). Incorporating change information into sexual offender risk assessments using the Violence Risk Scale–Sexual Offender version. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 26(5), 472–499. doi:10.1177/1079063213502679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., Beggs Christofferson, S. M., & Wong, S. C. P. (2015). Evaluation and applications of the clinically significant change method with the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: Implications for risk-change communication. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(1), 92–110. doi:10.1002/bsl.2159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., Nicholaichuk, T. P., Kingston, D. A., & Wong, S. C. P. (2014). A multisite examination of sexual violence risk and therapeutic change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(2), 312–324. doi:10.1037/a0035340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., Nicholaichuk, T. P., & Wong, S. C. P. (2014). The predictive and convergent validity of a psychometric battery used to assess sexual offenders in a treatment programme: An 18-year follow-up. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20(2), 216–239. doi:10.1080/13552600.2013.816791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49–69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66(6), 1025–1060. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Public Safety Canada. (2008). Outside the walls. Ottawa, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/csc-scc-rvw-pnl/report-rapport/otsd-wll-eng.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. D., Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. (2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly, 23, 384–405. doi: 10.1080/07418820600869152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Dickey, R. (1991). Denial and minimization among sex offenders. Annals of Sex Research, 4(1), 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Rozeboom, W. W. (1960). The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57(5), 416–428. doi: 10.1037/h0042040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozeboom, W. W. (1997). Good science is abductive, not hypothetico-deductive. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 335–392). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, J., Wilson, N., Kilgour, G., & Reynolds, N. (2013). Balancing efficiency and accuracy: Guidelines for the psychological assessment of extended supervision orders for child sex offenders in New Zealand. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(1), 139–157. doi:10.1080/13218719.2013.793154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1995). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. G. (1991). Procedures for adjusting self-reports of violence for social desirability bias. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6(3), 336–344. doi:10.1177/088626091006003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlager, M. D. (2009). The organizational politics of implementing risk assessment instruments in community corrections. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 25(4), 412–423. doi:10.1177/1043986209344555
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. L., Ervin, L., & Snyder-Joy, Z. (1996). Further exploration of the flight from discretion: The role of risk/need instruments in probation supervision decisions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(2), 109–121. doi:10.1016/0047-2352(95)00059-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, C. S. (2008). A meta-analysis of juvenile justice risk assessment instruments: Predictive validity by gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(11), 1367–1381. doi:10.1177/0093854808324377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serin, R. C., Lloyd, C. D., Helmus, L., Derkzen, D. M., & Luong, D. (2013). Does intra-individual change predict offender recidivism? Searching for the Holy Grail in assessing offender change. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(1), 32–53. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serin, R. C., Mailloux, D. L., & Wilson, N. J. (2012). The Dynamic Risk Assessment of Offender Re-entry (DRAOR). Unpublished user manual.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M., Luebbers, S., & Dolan, M. (2013). Gender and ethnicity in juvenile risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(4), 388–408. doi:10.1177/0093854812456776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, C. D. J., Tan, L., & Grace, R. C. (2015). Socially-desirable responding and psychometric assessment of dynamic risk in sexual offenders against children. Under revision for Psychology, Crime & Law.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, L., & Grace, R. C. (2008). Social desirability and sexual offenders: A review. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20(1), 61–87. Retrieved from http://sax.sagepub.com/content/20/1/61.abstract
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice. (2007). The importance of assessment in sex offender management: An overview of key principles and practices. Silver Spring. Retrieved from http://www.csom.org/pubs/assessment_brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Uziel, L. (2010). Rethinking social desirability scales: From impression management to interpersonally oriented self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 243–262. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veysey, B. M., & Hamilton, Z. (2007). Girls will be girls: Gender differences in predictors of success for diverted youth with mental health and substance abuse disorders. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(4), 341–362. doi:10.1177/1043986207309435
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (2015). Dynamic risk factors: Scientific kinds or predictive constructs. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(01-02), 2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Beech, A. R. (2014). Dynamic risk factors: A theoretical dead-end? Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(2), 100–113. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2014.917854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Casey, A. (2010). Extending the mind into the world: A new theory of cognitive distortions in sex offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(1), 49–58. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178909001001 doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., Johnston, L., & Marshall, W. L. (1997). Cognitive distortions in sex offenders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17(5), 479–507. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(97)81034-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S., & Gordon, A. E. (1999–2003). The Violence Risk Scale. Unpublished manuscript. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, S., Olver, M. E., Nicholaichuk, T. P., & Gordon, A. (2003). The Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version (VRS-SO). Saskatoon: Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan.
   Google Scholar
• Yesberg, J. A., Scanlan, J. M., Hanby, L. J., Serin, R. C., & Polaschek, D. L. L. (2015). Predicting women's recidivism: Validating a dynamic community-based ‘gender-neutral’ tool. Probation Journal, 62(1), 33–48. doi:10.1177/0264550514562851
   Google Scholar