A conceptual kaleidoscope: contemplating ‘dynamic structural risk’ and an uncoupling of risk from need

References

• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1994/2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27. doi: 10.1177/0011128705281756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & Simon, J. (2002). Embracing risk: The changing culture of Insurance and responsibility. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchette, K., & Brown, S. L. (2006). The assessment and treatment of women offenders: An integrative perspective. West Sussex: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks Holliday, S., Heilbrun, K., & Fretz, R. (2012). Examining improvements in criminogenic needs: The risk reduction potential of a structured re-entry program. Behavioural Sciences and Law, 2012, 30(4), 431–447. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, S. L., St. Amand, M. D., & Zamble, E. (2009). The dynamic prediction of criminal recidivism: A three-wave prospective study. Law and Human Behavior, 33(1), 25–45. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9139-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushway, S., Krohon, M., Lizotte, A. J., Phillips, M. D., & Schmidt, N. (2014). Are risky youth less protectable as they age? The dynamics of protection during adolescence and young adulthood. Justice Quarterly, 30(101), 84–116.
   Google Scholar
• Claverley, A. (2012). Cultures of desistance: Rehabilitation, reintegration and ethnic minorities, Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farrall, S., Bottoms, A. & Shapland, J. (2010). Social structures and desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 7(6), 546–570.
   Google Scholar
• Farrall, S., & Maruna, S. (2003). Desistance-focused criminal justice policy research: Introduction to a special issue on desistance from crime and public policy. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(4), 358–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2004.00335.x
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, CA., Bourke, P., & Ward, T. (2015). Expertise and child sex offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 20, 33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavazzi, S. M., Yarcheck, C. M., & Lim, J. -Y. (2005). Ethnicity, gender, and global risk indicators in the lives of status offenders coming to the attention of the juvenile court. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(6), 696–710. doi: 10.1177/0306624X05276467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghandnoosh, N. (2014). Race and punishment: Racial perceptions of crime and support for punitive policies. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, T. (2014). The indeterminacy of the risk factor prevention paradigm: A case study of community partnerships implementing youth and gang violence prevention policy. Youth Justice, 14(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1177/1473225413520275
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2004). Criminogenic needs and the transformative risk subject: Hybridizations of risk/need in penality. Punishment and Society, 7(1), 29–51. doi: 10.1177/1462474505048132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2006). Pandora's box: Risk/need and gender-responsive corrections. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(1), 183–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00113.x
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2009). Gridlock or mutability: Reconsidering ‘gender' and risk assessment. Criminology and Public Policy, 8(1), 209–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00549.x
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2013). Actuarial sentencing: An ‘unsettled' proposition. Justice Quarterly, 30(2), 270–296. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2012.682603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2015). Needle in a haystack: Logical parameters of treatment based on actuarial risk-needs assessments. Criminology and Public Policy, 14(1), 113–120. doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12121
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K., & Maurutto, P. (2010). Re-contextualizing pre-sentence reports. Punishment and Society, 12(3), 262–286. doi: 10.1177/1462474510369442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K., & O'Malley, P. (Eds.). (2007). Gendered risks. London: Routledge-Cavendish. Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, B. E. (2007). Against prediction: Profiling, policing and punishing in the actuarial age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, Bernard E. (2010). Risk as a proxy for race criminology and public policy. University of Chicago Law & Economics Olin Working Paper No. 535; University of Chicago Public Law Working Paper No. 323. Retrieved January 4, 2012, from SSRN, ssrn.com/abstract=1677654.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, R., & Ward, T. (2015). The conceptualization of dynamic risk factors in child sex offenders: An agency model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 250–260. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsinger, A. M., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2006). Exploring the validity of the level of service inventory-revised with Native American offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(3), 331–337. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtfreter, K., & Cupp, R. (2007). Gender and risk assessment: The empirical status of the LSI-R for women. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(4), 363–382. doi: 10.1177/1043986207309436
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B., & Bramhall, G. (2005). Assessing the other: Constructions of Asianness in risk assessment by probation officers. British Journal of Criminology, 45(5), 721–740. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azi002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, H. C., Stice, E., Kazdin, A., & Kupfer, D. (2001). How do risk factors work together to produce an outcome? Mediators, moderators, independent, overlapping and proxy risk factors. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(6), 848–856. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreis, M. K. F., Schwannauer, M., & Gillings, K. (2014). Relational risk factors for reoffending in women: A systematic review. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(4), 381–393. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2014.962713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J. (2015). Taking risk to the next step. Criminology and Public Policy, 14(1), 67–69. doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12120
   Google Scholar
• Martel, J., Brassard, R., & Jaccoud, M. (2011). When two worlds collide: Risk management in Canadian aboriginal corrections. British Journal of Criminology, 51(2), 235–255. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azr003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Maurutto, P., & Hannah-Moffat, K. (2006). Assembling risk and the restructuring of penal control. British Journal of Criminology, 46(3), 438–454. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azi073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurutto, P., & Hannah-Moffat, K. (2007a). Understanding risk in the context of the youth criminal justice act. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 49(4), 465–491.
   Google Scholar
• Maurutto, P., & Hannah-Moffat, K. (2007b). Response to commentary: Cross-examining risk ‘knowledge.’ Canadian Journal of Criminology, 49(4), 543–550.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F. (2003). Desistance-focused probation practice. In Wing Hong Chui & Mike Nellis (Eds.), Moving probation forward, (146–161). Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 439–466. doi: 10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polaschek, D. L. L. (2012). An appraisal of the risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment. Legal and Criminal Psychology, 17(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02038.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2007). Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199253944
   Google Scholar
• Quirouette, M., Hannah-Moffat, K., & Maurutto, P. (2015). ‘A precarious place:’ Housing and clients of specialized courts. British Journal of Criminology. http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/06/02/bjc.azv050.full.pdf+html
   Google Scholar
• Raynor, P., & Lewis, S. (2011). Risk-need assessment, sentencing and minority ethnic offenders in Britain. British Journal of Social Work, 41(7), 1357–1371. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salisbury, E. J., Van Voorhis, P., & Spiropoulis, G. V. (2009). The predictive validity of a gender responsive risk/needs assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 55(4), 550–585. doi: 10.1177/0011128707308102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, C. D., Willis, G. M., & Grace, R. C. (2012). Beyond static and dynamic risk factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(2), 222–238. doi: 10.1177/0886260511416472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeem, J. (2012). Risk technology in sentencing: Testing the promises and perils. Justice Quarterly. Advance online publication.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Cullen, F. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2009). Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta-analysis of the LSI-R and recidivism for female offenders. Criminology and Public Policy, 8(1), 183–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00551.x
   Google Scholar
• Spiropoulos, G., Salisbury, E. & Van Voorhis, P. (2015). Moderators of correctional treatment success: An exploratory study of racial differences. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(7), 835–860. doi: 10.1177/0306624X13492999
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Caudy, M. S. (2015). Risk tells us who, but not what or how: Empirical assessment of the complexity of criminogenic needs to inform correctional programming. Criminology and Public Policy, 14(1), 71–103. doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. N., & Blanchette, K. (2009). The women are not wrong: It is the approach that is debatable. Criminology and Public Policy, 8(1), 221–229. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00548.x
   Google Scholar
• Thigpen, M., Beauclair, T., Keiser, G., & Banks, C. (2010). Parole essentials: Practical guides for parole leaders. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
   Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P. (2012). On behalf of women offenders. Criminology and Public Policy, 11(2), 111–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P., Wright, E., Salisbury, S., & Bauman, A. (2010). Women's rick factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of gender responsive assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 261–288. doi: 10.1177/0093854809357442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitopoulos, N., Peterson-Badali, M., & Skilling, T. (2012). The relationship between matching service to criminogenic need and recidivism in male and female youth: Examining the RNR principles in practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(8), 1025–1041. doi: 10.1177/0093854812442895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 89–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.095931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (2016). Dynamic risk factors: Scientific kinds or predictive constructs. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(1–2), 2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Beech, A. R. (2015). Dynamic risk factors: A theoretical dead-end? Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(2), 100–113. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2014.917854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk paradigm. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar