How to make perpetrators in denial disclose more information about their crimes

References

• Alison, L. J., Alison, E., Noone, G., Elntib, S., & Christiansen, P. (2013). Why tough tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing rapport-based interpersonal techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 411–431. doi:10.1037/a0034564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2012). A model of behavioral self-regulation. In P. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 505–525). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deslauriers-Varin, N., Beauregard, E., & Wong, J. (2011). Changing their mind about confessing to police: The role of contextual factors in crime confession. Police Quarterly, 14, 5–24. doi:10.1177/1098611110392721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. R., Meissner, C. A., Ross, A. B., Houston, K. A., Russano, M. B., & Horgan, A. J. (2013). Obtaining guilty knowledge in human intelligence interrogations: Comparing accusatorial and information-gathering approaches with a novel experimental paradigm. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 83–88. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., Clemens, F., & Strömwall, L. A. (2009). The usual and the unusual suspects: Level of suspicion and counter-interrogation tactics. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 6, 129–137. doi:10.1002/jip.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 189–200. doi:10.1080/10683160701645181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2015). The Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) technique: A conceptual overview. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Deception detection: Current challenges and cognitive approaches (pp. 231–251). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., Hartwig, M., Mac Giolla, E., & Clemens, F. (2015). Suspects’ verbal counter-interrogation strategies: Towards an integrative model. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Deception detection: New challenges and cognitive approaches (pp. 293–314). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., Willén, R. M., & Hartwig, M. (2013). Eliciting cues to deception by tactical disclosure of evidence: The first test of the evidence framing matrix. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 341–355. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02047.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Luke, T. J. (2014). Strategic Use of Evidence during investigative interviews: The state of the science. In D. C. Raskin, C. R. Honts, & J. C. Kircher (Eds.), Credibility assessment: Scientific research an applications (pp. 1–36). Oxford: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 213–227. doi:10.1080/10683160600750264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Vrij, A. (2005). Detecting deception via strategic disclosure of evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 469–484. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-5521-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydon, G. (2004). Establishing the structure of police evidentiary interviews with suspects. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11, 27–49. doi:10.1558/sll.2004.11.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33–67. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, R. A. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973–), 86, 266–303. doi:10.2307/1144028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, T. J., Dawson, E., Hartwig, M., & Granhag, P. A. (2014). How awareness of possible evidence induces forthcoming counter-interrogation strategies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 876–882. doi:10.1002/acp.3019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, M. B., Mezo, P. G., & Francis, S. E. (2012). A conceptual framework for understanding self-regulation in adults. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 155–165. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., Kelly, C. E., & Woestehoff, S. A. (2015). Improving the effectiveness of suspect interrogations. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11, 211–233. doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Michael, S. W., Evans, J. R., Camilletti, C. R., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2014). Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 459–486. doi:10.1007/s11292-014-9207-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moston, S., & Engelberg, T. (2011). The effects of evidence on the outcome of interviews with criminal suspects. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 12, 518–526. doi:10.1080/15614263.2011.563963
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C. (2012). Admissions and confessions. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law, 12, 1–12. Retrieved from http://jpsl.org/archives/admissions-and-confessions/ doi: 10.5840/jpsl20121233
   Google Scholar
• Slough, M. C. (1959). Confessions and admissions. Fordham Law Review, 28, 96–114. Retrieved from http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1622&context=flr
   Google Scholar
• Soukara, S., Bull, R., Vrij, A., Turner, M., & Cherryman, J. (2009). What really happens in police interviews with suspects? Tactics and confessions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 493–506. doi:10.1080/10683160802201827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömwall, L. A., Hartwig, M., & Granhag, P. A. (2006). To act truthfully: Nonverbal behaviour and strategies during a police interrogation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 207–219. doi:10.1080/10683160512331331328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömwall, L. A., & Willen, R. M. (2011). Inside criminal minds: Offenders’ strategies when lying. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8, 271–281. doi:10.1002/jip.148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekin, S., Granhag, P. A., & Mac Giolla, E. (2014, June). Strategic interviewing to elicit new information: Making liars more forthcoming. Paper presented at the annual conference of the European Association of Psychology and Law, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
   Google Scholar
• Tekin, S., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., Mac Giolla, E., Vrij, A., & Hartwig, M. (2015). Interviewing strategically to elicit admissions from guilty suspects. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 244–252. doi:10.1037/lhb0000131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2015). Interviewing suspects: Examining the association between skills, questioning, evidence disclosure, and interview outcomes. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 661–680. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2015.1028544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar