Seeing is believing: observer perceptions of trait trustworthiness predict perceptions of honesty in high-stakes emotional appeals

References

• Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, D., & Lansley, C. (2015). Public appeals, news interviews and crocodile tears: An argument for multi-channel analysis. Corpora, 10, 231–258. doi:10.3366/cor.2015.0075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A., ten Brinke, L., & Porter, S. (2013). The face of an angel: Effect of exposure to details of moral behavior on facial recognition memory. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 101–106. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar, M., Neta, M., & Linz, H. (2006). Very first impressions. Emotion, 6, 269–278. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond Jr., C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. L., & Muhlenbruck, L. (1997). The accuracy-confidence correlation in the detection of deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 346–357. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., & Kirkendol, S. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 51–70). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Evanoff, C., Porter, S., & Black, P. (2014). Video killed the radio star? The influence of presentation modality on detecting high-stakes, emotional lies. Legal and Criminological Psychology. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F. (2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 643–659. doi:10.1037/a0023589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F. (2014). Lie detection from multiple cues: A meta-analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 661–676. doi:10.1002/acp.3052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, A. A., Ambady, N., & Kleck, R. E. (2005). The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach- and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion, 5, 119–124. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martelli, M., Majaj, N. J., & Pelli, D. G. (2005). Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. Journal of Vision, 5, 58–70. doi:10.1167/5.1.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuaid, S. M., Woodworth, M., Hutton, E. L., Porter, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2015). Automated insights: Verbal cues to deception in real-life high-stakes lies. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 617–631. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2015.1008477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, M. (2003). The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: The boy-who-cried-wolf effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1316–1327. doi:10.1177/0146167203254610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivola, C. Y., Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., Hortacsu, A., Ariely, D., & Todorov, A. (2009). A picture is worth a thousand inferences: First impressions and mate selection in Internet matchmaking and speed dating (Unpublished manuscript, Department of Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences). London, University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Olivola, C. Y., & Todorov, A. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 83–110. doi:10.1007/s10919-009-0082-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 11087–11092. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805664105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2009). Shared perceptual basis of emotional expressions and trustworthiness impressions from faces. Emotion, 9, 128–133. doi:10.1037/a0014520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., England, L., Juodis, M., ten Brinke, L., & Wilson, K. (2008). Is the face a window to the soul? Investigation of the accuracy of intuitive judgments of the trustworthiness of human faces. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 40, 171–177. doi:10.1037/0008-400X.40.3.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2008). Reading between the lies: Identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions. Psychological Science, 19, 508–514. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02116.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2009). Dangerous decisions: A theoretical framework for understanding how judges assess credibility in the courtroom. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 119–134. doi:10.1348/135532508X281520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., ten Brinke, L., & Gustaw, C. (2010). Dangerous decisions: The impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 477–491. doi:10.1080/10683160902926141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. v. Lifchus, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 320.
   Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2010). Democrats and republicans can be differentiated from their faces. PLoS One, 5, e8733. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.000873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O., Krendl, A. C., Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2013). Accuracy and consensus in judgments of trustworthiness from faces: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 409–426. doi:10.1037/a0031050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Brinke, L., & Porter, S. (2011). Friend or foe? The role of intuition in interpersonal trustworthiness and vulnerability assessments. In A. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (pp. 145–158). New York, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• ten Brinke, L., & Porter, S. (2012). Cry me a river: Identifying the behavioral consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 469–477. doi:10.1037/h0093929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Brinke, L., Porter, S., & Baker, A. (2012). Darwin the detective: Observable facial muscle contractions reveal emotional high-stakes lies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 411–416. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A. (2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: An extension of systems from recognition of emotions signaling approach/avoidance behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1124, 208–224. doi:10.1196/annals.1440.012.
   Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Baron, S. G., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Evaluating face trustworthiness: A model based approach. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 119–127. doi:10.1093/scan/nsn009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623–1626. doi: 10.1126/science.1110589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartanian, O., Stewart, K., Mandel, D. R., Pavlovic, N., McLellan, L., & Taylor, P. J. (2012). Personality assessment and behavioral prediction at first impression. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 250–254. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89–121. doi:10.1177/1529100610390861
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001). Who killed my relative? Police officers’ ability to detect real-life high-stake lies. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 7, 119–132. doi:10.1080/10683160108401791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2020–2045. doi:10.1037/xge0000014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. A., & Mattingley, J. B. (2006). Do angry men get noticed? Current Biology, 16, R402–R404. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. P., & Rule, N. O. (2015). Facial trustworthiness predicts extreme criminal-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 26, 1325–1331. doi:10.1177/0956797615590992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright Whelan, C., Wagstaff, G. F., & Wheatcroft, J. M. (2014). High-stakes lies: Verbal and nonverbal cues to deception in public appeals for help with missing or murdered relatives. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21, 523–537. doi:10.1080/13218719.2013.839931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright Whelan, C., Wagstaff, G. F., & Wheatcroft, J. M. (2015). High stakes lies: Police and non-police accuracy in detecting deception. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 127–138. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2014.935777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar