Increasing pressure does not benefit lie detection: a reply to Ten Brinke et al. (2015)

References

• Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, D. R., Yap, A. J., Lucas, B., Mehta, P., Ferrero, J. N., McGee, J. A., & Wilmuth, C. A. (2015). Power buffers stress. Manuscript under revision.
   Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., Kirkendol, S. E., Tang, J., & O'Brien, T. P. (1988 ). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replications and extensions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 177–202. doi:10.1007/BF00987487
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. R., Michael, S. W., Meissner, C. A., & Brandon, S. E. (2013). Validating a new assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a Psychologically Based Credibility Assessment Tool. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 33–41. doi:10.1016/j/jarmac.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, M. (2015). Collaboration between practice and science will enhance interrogations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 949–950. doi:10.1002/acp.3091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F. (2014). Lie detection from multiple cues: A meta-analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 661–667. doi:10.1002/acp.3052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2013). Criminal interrogation and confessions (5th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, S., Hartwig, M., Wallace, B., Dawson, E., & Xhihani, A. (2012). Early versus late disclosure of evidence: Effects on verbal cues to deception, confessions, and lie catchers’ accuracy. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 9, 1–12. doi:10.1002/jip.1350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215–228. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and Recommendations. Law and Human behavior, 34, 3–38. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Goldstein, C. C., & Savitsky, K. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 187–203. doi: 10.1023/A:1022599230598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, G. L. J., Vrij, A., Hope, L., & Waller, B. (2012). Sorting the liars from the truth tellers: The benefits of asking unanticipated questions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 107–114. doi:10.1002/acp.2879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal, S., Vrij, A., Warmelink, L., Vernham, Z., & Fisher, R. (2015). You cannot hide your telephone lies: Providing a model statement as an aid to detect deception in insurance telephone calls. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20, 129–146. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, R. A. (2008). Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., & Bond, C. F. (2014 ). Direct and indirect measures of lie detection tell the same story: A reply to ten Brinke, Stimson, and Carney (2014). Psychological Science, 25, 1960–1961. doi:10.1177/0956797614536740
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Michael, S. W., Evans, J. R., Camiletti, C. R., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2014). Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 459–486. doi:10.1007/s11292-014-9207-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., ten Brinke, L., & Wallace, B. (2012 ). Secrets and lies: Involuntary leakage in deceptive facial expressions as a function of emotional intensity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36, 23–37. doi:10.1007/s10919-011-0120-7
   Google Scholar
• Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. (2014). Committee study of the CIA’s Detention and Interrogation Program. US Senate. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20141209165504/http://www.intelligence.senate.gov/study2014/sscistudy1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ten Brinke, L., Khambatta, P., & Carney. D. R. (2015). Physically scarce (vs. enriched) environments decrease the ability to successfully tell lies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 982–992. doi:10.1037/xge0000103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Fisher, R., & Blank, H. (2015). A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta-analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2006). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 141–142. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2011). Outsmarting the liars: Towards a cognitive lie detection approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 28–32. doi:10.1177/0963721410391245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2014). Eliciting reliable information in investigative interviews. Policy Insights from Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 129–136. doi:10.1177/2372732214548592
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S., & Fisher, R. (2007 ). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 499–518.
   Google Scholar