Attribution of crime motives biases eyewitnesses’ memory and sentencing decisions

References

• Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556–574. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonio, M. E. (2006). Arbitrariness and the death penalty: How the defendant’s appearance during trial influences capital jurors’ punishment decision. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24, 215–234. doi: 10.1002/bsl.673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669–679. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner, G., Bless, H., Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1988). What triggers causal attributions? The impact of valence and subjective probability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 335–345. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(81)90008-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. S., & Payne, J. W. (1977). Crime seriousness, recidivism risk, and causal attributions in judgments of prison term by students and experts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 595–602. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centofanti, A. T., & Reece, J. (2006). The cognitive interview and its effect on misleading postevent information. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 669–683. doi: 10.1080/10683160600558394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman, S. D., Gregory, A. H., & Carlucci, M. (2009). Exploring the diagnostic utility of facial composites: Beliefs of guilt can bias perceived similarity between composite and suspect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 76–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, J. K., Boots, D. P., & Heide, K. M. (2003). Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded. Justice Quarterly, 20, 65–93. doi: 10.1080/07418820300095461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenda, S. J., Nichols, R. M., & Loftus, E. F. (2011). Current issues and advances in misinformation research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 20–23. doi: 10.1177/0963721410396620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533–543. doi: 10.1002/acp.885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K., & Wright, D. B. (2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 215–227. doi: 10.1348/1355325041719428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B. (2003). Implicational schemata and the correspondence bias: On the diagnostic value of situationally constrained behavior. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 84, 1154–1171. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebotys, R. J., & Dasgupta, B. (1987). Attribution of responsibility and crime seriousness. The Journal of Psychology, 121, 607–613. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1987.9712690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendolla, G. H. E., & Koller, M. (2001). Surprise and motivation of causal search: How are they affected by outcome valence and importance? Motivation and Emotion, 25, 327–349. doi: 10.1023/A:1014867700547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M. S., Westcott, D. R., & Bailey, S. E. (1998). When believing is seeing: The effect of scripts on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 685–694. doi: 10.1023/A:1025758807624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, J. H., & Weary, G. (1984). Current issues in attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 427–459. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.002235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. F. (1981). Causal attribution and punishment for crime. Deviant Behavior, 2, 207–230. doi: 10.1080/01639625.1981.9967554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. S., & Kaplan, M. F. (2003). The effects of racially stereotypical crimes on juror decision-making and information-processing strategies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1–13. doi: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2501_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., & Kulik, J. A. (1980). Schematic effects of social attitudes on information processing and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 569–578. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleider, H. M., Cavrak, S. E., & Knuycky, L. R. (2012). Looking like a criminal: Stereotypical black facial features promote face source memory error. Memory and Cognition, 40, 1200–1213. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0229-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleider, H. M., Pezdek, K., Goldinger, S. D., & Kirk, A. (2008). Schema-driven source misattribution errors: Remembering the expected from a witnessed event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1–20. doi: 10.1002/acp.1361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning and Memory, 12, 361–366. doi: 10.1101/lm.94705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malle, B. F. (2006). Intentionality, morality, and their relationship in human judgment. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6, 87–112. doi: 10.1163/156853706776931358
   Google Scholar
• Malle, B. F. (2011). Time to give up the dogmas of attribution: An alternative theory of behavior explanation. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 297–352). Burlington: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 340–372. doi: 10.1037/a0020518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, R. J., & Belli, R. F. (2006). The influence of schematic knowledge on contradictory versus additive misinformation: False memory for typical and atypical items. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 563–573. doi: 10.1002/acp.1207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuschatz, J. S., Lampinen, J. M., Preston, E. L., Hawkins, E. R., & Toglia, M. P. (2002). The effect of memory schemata on memory and the phenomenological experience of naturalistic situations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 687–708. doi: 10.1002/acp.824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizarro, D. A., Laney, C., Morris, E. K., & Loftus, E. F. (2006). Ripple effects in memory: Judgments of moral blame can distort memory for events. Memory and Cognition, 34, 550–555. doi: 10.3758/BF03193578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., Bellhouse, S., McDougall, A., Ten Brinke, L., & Wilson, K. (2010). A prospective investigation of the vulnerability of memory for positive and negative emotional scenes to the misinformation effect. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 42, 55–61. doi: 10.1037/a0016652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder, G. D., Kumar, S., Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Trafimow, D. (2002). Inferences about the morality of an aggressor: The role of perceived motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 789–803. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remijn, C. A. C., & Crombag, H. F. M. (2007). Heuristics in casual reasoning and their influence on eyewitness testimony. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 201–211. doi: 10.1080/10683160600711688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., Meade, M. L., & Bergman, E. T. (2001). Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 365–371. doi: 10.3758/BF03196174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruva, C. L., & Gagnon, E. M. (2013). Pretrial publicity and juror age affect juror decision making. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 179–202. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2011.616509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentis, K. P., & Burnstein, E. (1979). Remembering schema-consistent information: Effects of a balance schema on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2200–2211. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V. L. (1993). When prior knowledge and law collide: Helping jurors use the law. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 507–536. doi: 10.1007/BF01045071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V. L., & Studebaker, C. A. (1996). What do you expect? The influence of people’s prior knowledge of crime categories on fact-finding. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 517–532. doi: 10.1007/BF01499039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stangor, C., & McMillan, D. (1992). Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 42–61. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckey, M. R., & Brewer, N. (2003). The influence of schemas, stimulus ambiguity, and interview schedule on eyewitness memory over time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 101–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 26, 1–12. doi: 10.1037/h0080017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73–79. doi: 10.1037/h0022733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, E., Paterson, H., & Kemp, R. (2014). The effects of immediate recall on eyewitness accuracy and susceptibility to misinformation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 619–634. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2013.854788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wetmore, S. A., Neuschatz, J. S., & Gronlund, S. D. (2014). On the power of secondary confession evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 339–357. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2013.777963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, R. L., Doris, J. M., & Darley, J. M. (2006). Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility. Cognition, 100, 283–301. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar