Sexual assault complainants on the stand: a historical comparison of courtroom questioning

References

• Brewer, T., & Stapleton, T. (2008). Examination-in-chief. In J. B. Robertson, A. Beck, & S. Mount (Eds.), Introduction to Advocacy (2nd ed., pp. 205–245). Wellington: New Zealand Law Society.
   Google Scholar
• Brimacombe, C., Jung, S., Garrioch, L., & Allison, M. (2003). Perceptions of older adult eyewitnesses: Will you believe me when I’m 64? Law and Human Behavior, 27, 507–522. doi: 10.1023/A:1025486006769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows, K. S., & Powell, M. (2013). Prosecutors’ recommendations for improving child witness statements about sexual abuse. Policing and Society, 1–19. doi:10.1080/10439463.2013.784305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criminal Justice System. (2007). Achieving best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guidance in interviewing victims and witnesses, and using special measures. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K., & Bouhours, B. (2010). Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, 39, 565–650. doi: 10.1086/653101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D., & Loftus, E. F. (2007). Internal and external sources of misinformation in adult witness memory. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), Memory for events. Handbook of eyewitness psychology (Vol. l, pp. 195–237). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Eichelbaum, J. T. (1989). Mauet’s fundamentals of trial techniques: New Zealand Edition. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, K. (1995). Advocacy in court: A beginner’s guide (2nd ed.). London: Blackstone.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, L., & Kaladelfos, A. (2016). Sex crimes in the fifties. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Glissan, J. L. (1991). Cross-examination practice and procedure: An Australian perspective (2nd ed.). Sydney: Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Guadagno, B. L., Powell, M. B., & Wright, R. (2006). Police officers’ and legal professionals’ perceptions regarding how children are, and should be, questioned about repeated abuse. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 13, 251–260. doi: 10.1375/pplt.13.2.251
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (1990). The relationship of intellectual skills to suggestibility, compliance and acquiescence. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 227–231. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(90)90236-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. (2002). The theory of cross-examination in relation to children. In D. R. Westcott, G. M. Davies, & R. Bull (Eds.), Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (pp. 279–294). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, J. L. (2005). Justice from the victim’s perspective. Violence Against Women, 11, 571–602. doi: 10.1177/1077801205274450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, F., & Zajac, R. (2014). The effect of age and reminders on witnesses’ responses to cross-examination-style questioning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., Peterson, J., Sommers, I., & Baskin, D. (2012). Use of forensic science in investigating crimes of sexual violence contrasting its theoretical potential with empirical realities. Violence Against Women, 18(2), 193–222. doi: 10.1177/1077801212440157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, J. (2001). Worlds apart? Women, rape and the police reporting process. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 679–706. doi: 10.1093/bjc/41.4.679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. R., Deprez, S., & Wagstaff, G. F. (2003). The direct and cross-examination of complainants and defendants in rape trials: A quantitative analysis of question type. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 49–59. doi: 10.1080/10683160308139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. R., O'Kelly, C. M., & Gilchrist, E. L. (2007). Rape victims' experiences of giving evidence in English courts: a survey. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 14, 111–119. doi: 10.1375/pplt.14.1.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 3–27. doi: 10.1080/10683169908414991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2008). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (1998). Conducting investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 813–823. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00056-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, S. (2002). Carnal knowledge: Rape on trial (2nd ed.). London: The Women’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, E. A., Erickson, B. E., Conley, J., & O’Barr, W. M. (1978). Social attributions and conversation style in trial testimony. Journal of Personalilty and Social Psychology, 36, 1558–1567. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, J. P. (1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 90–95. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.62.1.90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585–589. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of experimental psychology: Human learning and memory, 4, 19–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 16, 340–372. doi: 10.1037/a0020518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Police. (2009). Witness guide. Wellington: New Zealand Police.
   Google Scholar
• Oxburgh, G. E., Myklebust, T., & Grant, T. (2010). The question of question types in police interviews: A review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 17, 46–66. doi: 10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, D. A., & White, L. T. (1991). Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27, 975–986. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.27.6.975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M. B., Fisher, R. P., & Wright, R. (2005). Investigative interviewing. In N. Brewer & K. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective (pp. 11–42). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Ruva, C. L., & Bryant, J. B. (2004). The impact of age, speech style, and question form on perceptions of witness credibility and trial outcome. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1919–1944. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02593.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharman, S. J., & Powell, M. B. (2012). A comparison of adult witnesses’ suggestibility across various types of leading questions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 48–53. doi: 10.1002/acp.1793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, V. (2010). The stern review. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Turtle, J., & Wells, G. L. (1988). Children versus adults as eyewitnesses: Whose testimony holds up under cross-examination? In M. M. Gruneburg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (pp. 27–33). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., & Maras, K. (2011). The effect of cross-examination on the accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 554–561. doi: 10.1002/acp.1768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterman, A. H., Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (2001). Interviewing children and adults: The effect of question format on the tendency to speculate. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 521–531. doi: 10.1002/acp.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westera, N., Kebbell, M., & Milne, R. (2016). Want a better criminal justice response to rape? Improve police interviews with complainants and suspects. Violence Against Women. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1077801216631439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westera, N., McKimmie, B. M., Kebbell, M., Milne, R., & Masser, B. (2015). Does the narrative style of video-evidence influence judgments about rape-complainant testimony? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 637–646. doi: 10.1002/acp.3146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westera, N., Powell, M., & Milne, R. (2015). Lost in the detail: Prosecutors’ perceptions of the utility of video recorded police interviews as rape complainant evidence. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0004865815620705
   Google Scholar
• Wigmore, J. H. (1974). Evidence in trials at common law. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Zajac, R., & Cannan, P. (2009). Cross-examination of sexual assault complainants: A developmental comparison. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16, 36–54. doi: 10.1080/13218710802620448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, R., Gross, J., & Hayne, H. (2003). Asked and answered: Questioning children in the courtroom. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 10, 199–209. doi: 10.1375/pplt.2003.10.1.199
   Google Scholar
• Zajac, R., O’Neill, S., & Hayne, H. (2012). Disorder in the courtroom? Child witnesses under cross-examination. Developmental Review, 32, 181–204. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2012.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zydervelt, S., Zajac, R., Kaladelfos, A., & Westera, N. (2016). Lawyers’ strategies for cross-examining rape complainants: Have we moved beyond the 1950s? British Journal of Criminology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/bjc/azw023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar