Inconsistencies across repeated eyewitness interviews: supportive negative feedback can make witnesses change their memory reports

References

• Arbuthnott, K. D., Kealy, K. K., & Ylioja, S. (2008). Judgement of confidence in childhood memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 953–978. doi: 10.1002/acp.1404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, S. A., & Baxter, J. S. (2000). Interrogative suggestibility: The role of interviewer behaviour. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5, 123–133. doi: 10.1348/135532500168029
   Google Scholar
• Bain, S. A., Baxter, J. S., & Fellowes, V. (2004). Interacting influences on interrogative suggestibility. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 239–252. doi: 10.1348/1355325041719419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, S. A., McGroarty, A., & Runcie, M. (2015). Coping strategies, self-esteem and levels of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 85–89. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. C., & Memon, A. (2007). Eyewitness memory in young and older eyewitnesses. In R. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol. II: Memory for people (pp. 309–338). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J., Charles, K., Martin, M., & McGroarty, A. (2013). The relative influence of leading questions and negative feedback on response change on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (2): Implications for forensic interviewing. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 277–285. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2011.631538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. S., Boon, J. W., & Marley, C. (2006). Interrogative pressure and responses to minimally leading questions. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 87–98. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bergen, S., Jelicic, M., & Merckelbach, H. (2008). Interrogation techniques and memory distrust. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 425–434. doi: 10.1080/10683160701822533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, G. L., & Cutler, B. L. (1996). Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 170–177. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, G. L., Narby, D. J., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Effects of inconsistent eyewitness statements on mock-jurors’ evaluations of the eyewitness, perceptions of defendant culpability and verdicts. Law And Human Behavior, 19, 79–88. doi: 10.1007/BF01499074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, N., Potter, R., Fisher, R. P., Bond, N., & Luszcz, M. A. (1999). Beliefs and data on the relationship between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 297–313. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199908)13:4<297::AID-ACP578>3.0.CO;2-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. C., Kofler, L. M., Forster, D. E., & McCullough, M. E. (2015). A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect: Self-control does not seem to rely on a limited resource. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 796–815. doi: 10.1037/xge0000083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, R., Lincoln, R., & Frank, M. G. (2002). The effect of rapport in forensic interviewing. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 9, 69–78. doi: 10.1375/pplt.2002.9.1.69
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D., & Leo, R. A. (2012). Interrogation-related regulatory decline: Ego depletion, failures of self-regulation, and the decision to confess. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 673–704. doi: 10.1037/a0027367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D., & Loftus, E. F. (2007). Internal and external sources of misinformation in adult witness memory. In M. P. Toglia, J. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. L. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol. I: Memory for events (pp. 195–237). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). The relation between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. In G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. MvMurran, & C. Wilson (Eds.), Law and criminal justice (pp. 21–28). Berlin: DeGruyter.
   Google Scholar
• van Giezen, A. E., Arensman, E., Spinhoven, P., & Wolters, G. (2005). Consistency of memory for emotionally arousing events: A review of prospective and experimental studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 935–953. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. (1997). The gudjonsson suggestibility scales manual. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (1989). Compliance in an interrogative situation: A new scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 535–540. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(89)90035-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. West Sussex: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H., & Clark, N. K. (1986). Suggestibility in police interrogation: A social psychological model. Social Behaviour, 1, 83–104.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Sigurdardottir, A. S., Steinthorsson, H., & Sigurdardottir, V. M. (2014). The role of memory distrust in cases of internalized false confession. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 336–348. doi: 10.1002/acp.3002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Alberts, H., Anggono, C. O., Batailler, C., Birt, A., … Zwienenberg, M. (2016). A multilab preregistered replication of the ego depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 546–573. doi: 10.1177/1745691616652873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495–525. doi: 10.1037/a0019486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, E. L., Paterson, H. M., Denson, T., Kemp, R. I., Mullan, B., & Sainsbury, K. (2015). Can ego depletion and post-event discussion change the way we remember a crime? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22, 172–183. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2014.924384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkel, L. A. (2014a). Do older adults change their eyewitness reports when re-questioned? The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, 356–365. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkel, L. A. (2014b). Memory trust and distrust in elderly eyewitnesses: To what extent do older adults doubt their memories? In M. P. Toglia, D. F. Ross, J. Pozzulu, & E. Pica (Eds.), The elderly eyewitness in court (pp. 232–262). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, L. A., & Coffman, K. J. (2004). Memory distortions in coerced false confessions: A source monitoring framework analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 567–588. doi: 10.1002/acp.1026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, R. E., Douglas, K. M., & Hayes, B. K. (1999). Children’s eyewitness suggestibility: Memory trace strength revisited. Cognitive Development, 14, 443–462. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(99)00014-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan, A. J., Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., & Evans, J. R. (2012). Minimization and maximization techniques: Assessing the perceived consequences of confessing and confession diagnosticity. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 65–78. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2011.561801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horselenberg, R., Merckelbach, H., & Josephs, S. (2003). Individual differences and false confessions: A conceptual replication of Kassin and Kiechel (1996). Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 1–8. doi: 10.1080/10683160308141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horselenberg, R., Merckelbach, H., Smeets, T., Franssens, D., Ygram Peters, G., & Zeles, G. (2006). False confessions in the lab: Do plausibility and consequences matter? Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 61–75. doi: 10.1080/1068310042000303076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, F., & Zajac, R. (2014). The effect of age and reminders on witnesses’ responses to cross-examination-style questioning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. (2015). The social psychology of false confessions. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 25–51. doi: 10.1111/sipr.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00344.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. R., & Giles, D. C. (2000). Some experimental influences of lawyers’ complicated questions on eyewitness confidence and accuracy. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 134, 129–139. doi: 10.1080/00223980009600855
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, C. E., Miller, J. C., Redlich, A. D., & Kleinman, S. M. (2013). A taxonomy of interrogation methods. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 165–178. doi: 10.1037/a0030310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C. E., Redlich, A. D., & Miller, J. C. (2015). Examining the meso-level domains of the interrogation taxonomy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21, 179–191. doi: 10.1037/law0000034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieckhaefer, J. M., Vallano, J. P., & Schreiber Compo, N. S. (2014). Examining the positive effects of rapport building: When and why does rapport building benefit adult eyewitness memory? Memory, 22, 1010–1023. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.864313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebman, J. I., McKinley-Pace, M. J., Leonard, A., Sheesley, L. A., Gallant, C. L., Renkey, M. E., & Lehman, E. (2002). Cognitive and psychosocial correlates of adults’ eyewitness accuracy and suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 49–66. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00135-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, L. C., & Lamb, M. E. (2010). Biases in judging victims and suspects whose statements are inconsistent. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 46–48. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9211-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, G., Scoboria, A., & Harvey, L. (2010). Nonbelieved memories. Psychological Science, 21, 1334–1340. doi: 10.1177/0956797610379865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGroarty, A., & Baxter, J. S. (2007). Interrogative pressure in simulated forensic interviews: The effects of negative feedback. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 455–465. doi: 10.1348/000712606X147510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGroarty, A., & Baxter, J. S. (2009). Interviewer behaviour, interviewee self-esteem and response change in simulated forensic interviews. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 642–646. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurtrie, H., Baxter, J. S., Obonsawin, M. C., & Hunter, S. C. (2012a). Consistent witness responses: The effects of age and negative feedback. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 958–962. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurtrie, H., Baxter, J. S., Obonsawin, M. C., & Hunter, S. C. (2012b). The relationship between memory beliefs, compliance, and response change within a simulated forensic interview. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 591–595. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Gabbert, F., & Hope, L. (2004). The ageing eyewitness. In J. R. Adler (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Concepts, debates and practice (pp. 96–112). Devon: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, R. A., Nash, A., Morris, A., & Smith, S. L. (2015). Does rapport-building boost the eyewitness eye closure effect in closed questioning? Legal and Criminological Psychology. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2014). Identifying the culprit: Assessing eyewitness identification. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odinot, G., Memon, A., LaRooy, D., & Millen, A. (2013). Are two interviews better than one? Memory across repeated cognitive interviews. PLoS One, 8(10), e76305. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofshe, R., & Leo, R. A. (1997). The decision to confess falsely: Rational choice and irrational action. Denver University Law Review, 74, 979–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otgaar, H., Alberts, H., & Cuppens, L. (2012a). How cognitive resources alter our perception of the past: Ego depletion enhances the susceptibility to suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 159–163. doi: 10.1002/acp.1810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otgaar, H., Alberts, H., & Cuppens, L. (2012b). Ego depletion results in an increase in spontaneous false memories. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1673–1680. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polczyk, R., Wesołowska, B., Gabarczyk, A., Minakowska, I., Supska, M., & Bomba, E. (2004). Age differences in interrogative suggestibility: A comparison between young and older adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1097–1107. doi: 10.1002/acp.1073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlich, A. D., Kelly, C. E., & Miller, J. C. (2014). The who, what, and why of human intelligence gathering: Self-reported measures of interrogation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 817–828. doi: 10.1002/acp.3040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., Narchet, F. M., & Kassin, S. M. (2005). Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science, 16, 481–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. I., McClure, K. A., & Dykstra, J. A. (2007). Eyewitness confidence from the witnessed event through trial. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, R. L. Lindsay, M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, … R. L. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol. I: Memory for events (pp. 371–397). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smeets, T., Candel, I., & Merckelbach, H. (2004). Accuracy, completeness, and consistency of emotional memories. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 595–609. doi: 10.2307/4148994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., & Maras, K. (2011). The effect of cross-examination on the accuracy of adult eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 554–561. doi: 10.1002/acp.1768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallano, J. P., & Schreiber Compo, N. (2015). Rapport-building with cooperative witnesses and criminal suspects: A theoretical and empirical review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21, 85–99. doi: 10.1037/law0000035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatcroft, J. M., & Ellison, L. E. (2012). Evidence in court: Witness preparation and cross-examination style effects on adult witness accuracy. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30, 821–840. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. S., Nash, R. A., & Wade, K. A. (2015). Encouraging eyewitnesses to falsely corroborate allegations: Effects of rapport-building and incriminating evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 648–660. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2015.1028543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar