Field validity of the HCR-20 in forensic medium security units in Flanders

References

• Abderhalden, C., Needham, I., Dassen, T., Halfens, R., Haug, H. J., & Fischer, J. E. (2008). Structured risk assessment and violence in acute psychiatric wards: Randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 193(1), 44–50. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.045534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almvik, R., Woods, P., & Rasmussen, K. (2000). The Brøset Violence Checklist: Sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(12), 1284–1296. doi: 10.1177/088626000015012003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ( Text Revision, 4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Boers, A., Vandevelde, S., Soyez, V., De Smet, S., & Ting To, W. (2011). Het zorgaanbod voor geïnterneerden in België [System of care for internees in Belgium]. Panopticon, 2, 17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., & Leese, M. (2001). Detention of people with dangerous severe personality disorders: A systematic review. The Lancet, 358(9297), 1955–1959. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06962-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claix, A., & Pham, T. H. (2004). Evaluation of the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme in a Belgian forensic population. L'Encéphale, 30(5), 447–453. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7006(04)95459-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coid, J. W., Yang, M., Ullrich, S., Zhang, T., Sizmur, S., Farrington, D., & Rogers, R. (2011). Most items in structured risk assessment instruments do not predict violence. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 22(1), 3–21. doi:10.1080/14789949.2010.495990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMatteo, D., Edens, J. F., Galloway, M., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., & Formon, D. (2014). The role and reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in U.S. sexually violent predator evaluations: A case law survey. Law and Human Behavior, 38(3), 248–255. doi:10.1037/lhb0000059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2007). Best practice in managing risk: Principles and evidence for best practice in the assessment and management of risk to self and others in mental health services. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen. (2014). Kernset prestatie-indicatoren forensische psychiatrie verslagjaar 2014 [Core set of performance indicators for forensic psychiatry]. Retrieved March 30, 2015, from http://www.forensischezorg.nl/files/indicatorengids_verslagjaar_2014_v1.1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, M., & Khawaja, A. (2004). The HCR–20 and post-discharge outcome in male patients discharged from medium security in the UK. Aggressive Behavior, 30(6), 469–483. doi:10.1002/ab.20044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Shaffer, C., Blanchard, A. J. E., Guy, L. S., Reeves, K. A., & Weir, J. (2014). HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography. Retrieved October 14, 2014, from http://kdouglas.wordpress.com/hcr-20/hcr-20-overview-and-annotated-bibliography/
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., & Belfrage, H. (2014). Interrater reliability and concurrent validity of the HCR-20 Version 3. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 130–139. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.908429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20 (Version 3): Assessing risk for violence. Burnaby, BC: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., Belfrage, H., Guy, L. S., & Wilson, C. M. (2014). Historical-Clinical-Risk management-20, Version 3 (HCR-20V3): Development and overview. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 93–108. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.906519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., & Reeves, K. (2010). The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and re-view of the research. In R. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 147–185). Oxford: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Elbogen, E. (2002). The process of violence risk assessment: A review of descriptive research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 591–604. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00051-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Medical Journal, 345. doi:10.1136/bmj.e4692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. (1986). The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, N. S., Snowden, R. J., MacCulloch, S., Phillips, H., Taylor, J., & MacCulloch, M. J. (2004). Relative efficacy of criminological, clinical, and personality measures of future risk of offending in mentally disordered offenders: A comparative study of HCR-20, PCL:SV, and OGRS. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(3), 523–530. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.72.3.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, N. S., Taylor, J., & Snowden, R. J. (2008). Predicting violent reconvictions using the HCR-20. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 192(5), 384–387. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.044065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, B., Carroll, A., & Brett, A. (2010). Structured risk assessment in community forensic mental health practice. Australasian Psychiatry, 18(6), 538–541. doi:10.3109/10398562.2010.498513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, L. S., Douglas, K. S., & Hendry, M. C. (2010). The role of psychopathic personality disorder in violence risk assessments using the HCR-20. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24(5), 551–580. doi:10.1521/pedi.2010.24.5.551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 1–21. doi:10.1037/a0014421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist Revised. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K. (1992). The role of psychological testing in forensic assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 16(3), 257–272. doi:10.1007/BF01044769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, M., Hesper, B., Spreen, M., & Nijman, H. L. I. (2005). De waarde van gestructureerde risicotaxatie en van de diagnose psychopathie: Een onderzoek naar de betrouwbaarheid en predictieve validiteit van de HCR-20, HKT-30 en PCL-R [The value of structured risk assessment and the diagnoses psychopathy: A study of the reliability and predictive validity of the HCR-20, HKT-30 and PCL-R]. Utrecht: Expertisecentrum Forensische Psychiatrie.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, N., & Ennis, L. (2010). Assessing risk for forensic psychiatric inpatient violence: A meta-analysis. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 137–147.
   Google Scholar
• Hurducas, C. C., Singh, J. P., de Ruiter, C., & Petrila, J. (2014). Violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review of surveys. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(3), 181–192. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.942923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, R. N., Yassi, A., Smailes, E., Lovato, C. Y., & Koehoorn, M. (2011). Evaluation of a violence risk assessment system (the Alert System) for reducing violence in an acute hospital: A before and after study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(5), 534–539. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health. (1998). Guidelines for clinical risk assessment and management in mental health services. Wellington: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, N., Nijman, H., van der Hulst, W., & van den Bout, J. (2011). Het voorspellen van agressie tijdens de behandeling van forensisch psychiatrische patiënten aan de hand van de HCR-20 [Predicting aggression during the treatment of forensic psychiatric patients by means of the HCR-20]. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 53(10), 705–713.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neal, T. M. S., Miller, S. L., & Shealy, R. C. (2015). A field study of a comprehensive violence risk assessment battery. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(9), 952–968. doi:10.1177/0093854815572252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, L. E., Mitchell, A. E., Picchioni, M. M., & Dickens, G. L. (2013). Moderators of the predictive efficacy of the Historical, Clinical and Risk management-20 for aggression in psychiatric facilities: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 255–270. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, L., Ramussen, K., & Elsass, P. (2012). HCR-20 violence risk assessments as a guide for treating and managing violence risk in a forensic psychiatric setting. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(8), 733–743. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.548814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, S. R., McMaster, R., & Wilkie, T. (2014). Multirater reliability of the Historical, Clinical, and Risk management-20. Assessment, 21(1), 15–27. doi:10.1177/1073191113514107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, T. H., Ducro, C., Marghem, B., & Réveillère, C. (2005). Évaluation du risque de récidive au sein d'une population de délinquants incarcérés ou internés en Belgique francophone [Prediction of recidivism among prison inmates and forensic patients in Belgium]. Annales Medico-Psychologique, revue psychiatrique, 163(10), 842–845. doi:10.1016/j.amp.2005.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipse, M., de Ruiter, C., Hildebrand, M., & Bouman, Y. (2000). HCR-20. Beoordelen van het risico van gewelddadig gedrag. Versie 2 [HCR-20. Assessing risk for violence. Version 2]. Nijmegen: Pompestichting/Dr. Henri van der Hoeven Stichting.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, K., & Miles, H. L. (2009). The effect of training on the quality of HCR-20 violence risk assessments in forensic secure services. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20(3), 473–480. doi:10.1080/14789940802638366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Roychowdhury, A., & Adshead, G. (2014). Violence risk assessment as a medical intervention: Ethical tensions. Psychiatric Bulletin, 38(2), 75–82. doi:10.1192/pb.bp.113.043315
   Google Scholar
• Rufino, K. A., Boccaccini, M. T., & Guy, L. S. (2011). Scoring subjectivity and item performance on measures used to assess violence risk: The PCL-R and HCR-20 as exemplars. Assessment, 18(4), 453–463. doi:10.1177/1073191110378482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Sande, R., Nijman, H. L., Noorthoorn, E. O., Wierdsma, A. I., Hellendoorn, E., van der Staak, C., & Mulder, C. L. (2011). Aggression and seclusion on acute psychiatric wards: Effect of short-term risk assessment. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199(6), 473–478. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.095141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P. (2013). Predictive validity performance indicators in violence risk assessment: A methodological primer. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(1), 8–22. doi:10.1002/bsl.2052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Desmarais, S. L., Hurducas, C., Arbach-Lucioni, K., Condemarin, C., Dean, K., … Otto, R. K. (2014). International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: A global survey of 44 countries. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(3), 193–206. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.922141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., & Fazel, S. (2010). Forensic risk assessment: A metareview. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(9), 965–988. doi:10.1177/0093854810374274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 499–513. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2013). Authorship bias in violence risk assessment? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 8(9), e72484. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöstedt, G., & Grann, M. (2002). Risk assessment: What is being predicted by actuarial prediction instruments? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1(2), 179–183. doi:10.1080/14999013.2002.10471172
   Google Scholar
• Spreen, M., Brand, E., Ter Horst, P., & Bogaerts, S. (2014). Handleiding en methodologische verantwoording HKT-R, Historisch, Klinische en Toekomstige - Revisie [Manual and methodological considerations of the HKT-R, Historical, Clinical and Future - Revision]. Groningen: Dr. van Mesdag.
   Google Scholar
• Szmukler, G. (2003). Risk assessment ‘numbers’ and ‘values’. Psychiatric Bulletin, 27(6), 205–207. doi:10.1192/pb.27.6.205
   Google Scholar
• Troquete, N. A., van den Brink, R. H., Beintema, H., Mulder, T., van Os, T. W., Schoevers, R. A., & Wiersma, D. (2013). Risk assessment and shared care planning in out-patient forensic psychiatry: Cluster randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 202(5), 365–371. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.112.113043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., van den Broek, E., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2014). The use of the HCR-20V3 in Dutch forensic psychiatric practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 109–121. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.906518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., & de Ruiter, C. (2004). Differences between clinicians and researchers in assessing risk of violence in forensic psychiatric patients. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 15(1), 145–164. doi:10.1080/14788940410001655916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., & de Ruiter, C. (2006). Structured professional judgment of violence risk in forensic clinical practice: A prospective study into the predictive validity of the Dutch HCR-20. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(3), 321–336. doi:10.1080/10683160600569029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Hildebrand, M., Bos, B., & van de Ven, P. (2004). Type of discharge and risk of recidivism measured by the HCR-20: A retrospective study in a Dutch sample of treated forensic psychiatric patients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 3(2), 149–165. doi:10.1080/14999013.2004.10471204
   Google Scholar
• Vojt, G., Thomson, L. D. G., & Marshall, L. A. (2013). The predictive validity of the HCR-20 following clinical implementation: Does it work in practice? The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24(3), 371–385. doi:10.1080/14789949.2013.800894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D., Kroner, D. G., & DeMatteo, D. (2014). The impact of base rate utilization and clinical experience on the accuracy of judgments made with the HCR-20. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 14(4), 288–301. doi:10.1080/15228932.2014.941726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wand, T. (2012). Investigating the evidence for the effectiveness of risk assessment in mental health care. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 33(1), 2–7. doi:10.3109/01612840.2011.616984
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (Version 2). Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Martin, M. L., Brink, J., Nicholls, T. L., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Manual for the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START). Port Coquitlam, BC: Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission and St. Joseph’s Healthcare.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. M., Desmarais, S. L., Nicholls, T. L., Hart, S. D., & Brink, J. (2013). Predictive validity of dynamic factors: Assessing violence risk in forensic psychiatric inpatients. Law and Human Behavior, 37(6), 377–388. doi:10.1037/lhb0000025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar