375
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special section: Intellectual Disability

The reliabilty and validity of a revised version of the How I Think Questionnaire for men who have intellectual disabilities

, &
Pages 379-390 | Received 16 Mar 2016, Accepted 30 Dec 2016, Published online: 06 Feb 2017

References

  • Axelrod, B. N. (2002). Validity of the Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence and other very short forms of estimating intellectual functioning. Assessment, 9(1), 17–23. doi: 10.1177/1073191102009001003
  • Bacchini, D., De Angelis, G., Affuso, G., & Brugman, D. (2015). The structure of self-serving cognitive distortions: A validation of the ‘How I Think' questionnaire in a sample of Italian adolescents. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49(2), 163–180. doi:10.1177/0748175615596779
  • Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175. doi: 10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
  • Barriga, A. Q., & Gibbs, J. C. (1996). Measuring cognitive distortion in antisocial youth: Development and preliminary validation of the ‘How I Think’ questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 22(5), 333–343. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:5<333::AID-AB2>3.0.CO;2-K
  • Barriga, A. Q., Gibbs, J. C., Potter, G. B., & Liau, A. K. (2001). How I Think (HIT) Questionnaire manual. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
  • Bear, G. G., & Rys, G. S. (1994). Moral reasoning, classroom behavior, and sociometric status among elementary school children. Developmental Psychology, 30, 633–638. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.30.5.633
  • Buell, S., Langdon, P. E., Bunning, K., & Pounds, G. (2016). The effects of linguistic simplification and mediation on the comprehension of adapted (‘easy read’) text by people with intellectual disabilities: A randomised experiment. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 60, 644–644.
  • Buell, S., Pounds, G., Bunning, K., & Langdon, P. E. (2016). Easy read: Simplification or reduction? Critical differences in the discourse of UK Department of Health adapted ‘easy read’ literature for people with intellectual disabilities and their ‘non-easy read’ equivalents. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 60, 645–645.
  • Fernández, M. E. P., Rodríguez, J. M. A., & Gibbs, J. (2013). Psychometrical properties of the ‘How I Think’ Questionnaire (HIT-Q) in adolescents. Psicothema, 25(4), 542–548.
  • Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221–233. doi: 10.1037/h0057532
  • Gibbs, J. C. (1991). Sociomoral developmental delay and cognitive distortion: Implications for the treatment of antisocial youth. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behaviour and development: Vol. 3 (pp. 95–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Gibbs, J. C. (1993). Moral-cognitive interventions. In A. P. Goldstein & C. R. Huff (Eds.), The gang intervention handbook (pp. 159–185). Champaign, IL: Research Press.
  • Gibbs, J. C. (2013). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gibbs, J. C., Basinger, K. S., & Fuller, D. (1992). Moral maturity: Measuring the development of sociomoral reflection. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Gibbs, J. C., Potter, G., & Goldstein, A. P. (1995). The EQUIP programme: Teaching youth to think and act responsibly through a peer-helping approach. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
  • Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2013). Measuring self-serving cognitive distortions: A meta-analysis of the psychometric properties of the How I Think Questionnaire (HIT). European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(4), 510–517. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2012.707312
  • Hockley, O., & Langdon, P. E. (2015). Men with intellectual disabilities with a history of sexual offending: Empathy for victims of sexual and non-sexual crimes. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 59(4), 332–341. doi: 10.1111/jir.12137
  • Langdon, P. E., Clare, I. C. H., & Murphy, G. H. (2010a). Developing an understanding of the literature relating to the moral development of people with intellectual disabilities. Developmental Review, 30(3), 273–293. doi:10.1016/J.Dr.2010.01.001
  • Langdon, P. E., Clare, I. C. H., & Murphy, G. H. (2010b). Illegal behaviour and moral reasoning amongst men with and without ID. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23(5), 428.
  • Langdon, P. E., Clare, I. C. H., & Murphy, G. H. (2011). Moral reasoning theory and illegal behaviour by adults with intellectual disabilities. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(2), 101–115. doi: 10.1080/10683160903392384
  • Langdon, P. E., & Hockley, O. (2012). Empathy towards victims of sexual and non-sexual crimes amongst men with intellectual disabilities who are convicted sexual offenders. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 688.
  • Langdon, P. E., Murphy, G. H., Clare, I. C. H., & Palmer, E. J. (2010). The psychometric properties of the Socio-Moral Reflection Measure – Short Form and the Moral Theme Inventory for men with and without intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 1204–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.07.025
  • Langdon, P. E., Murphy, G. H., Clare, I. C. H., Steverson, T., & Palmer, E. J. (2011). Relationships among moral reasoning, empathy, and distorted cognitions in men with intellectual disabilities and a history of criminal offending. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 116, 438–456. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-116.6.438
  • Lindsay, W. R., & Michie, A. M. (2004). Two studies using the questionnaire on attitudes consistent with sexual offending (QACSO) to discriminate between categories of sex offenders. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48, 464. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2004.00627.x
  • Lindsay, W. R., Michie, A. M., Whitefield, E., Martin, V., Grieve, A., & Carson, D. (2006). Response patterns on the questionnaire on attitudes consistent with sexual offending in groups of sex offenders with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 19(1), 47–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00288.x
  • McDermott, E., & Langdon, P. E. (2016). The moral reasoning abilities of men and women with intellectual disabilities who have a history of criminal offending behaviour. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21, 25–40. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12051
  • Nas, C. N., Brugman, D., & Koops, W. (2008). Measuring self-serving cognitive distortions with the ‘How I Think’ Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 181–189. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.3.181
  • Plante, N., Daigle, M. S., Gaumont, C., Charbonneau, L., Gibbs, J., & Barriga, A. (2012). Validation of the ‘How I Think Questionnaire’ in a population of French-speaking adolescents with externalizing behaviors. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30(2), 196–210. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2001
  • Stams, G. J., Brugman, D., Deković, M., van Rosmalen, L., van der Laan, P., & Gibbs, J. C. (2006). The moral judgement of juvenile delinquents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 692–708. doi: 10.1007/s10802-006-9056-5
  • Van Leeuwen, N. K., Chauchard, E., Chabrol, H., & Gibbs, J. (2013). Étude des qualités psychométriques de la version française du How I Think Questionnaire dans un échantillon d’adolescents français. L'Encéphale, 39(6), 401–407. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.013
  • Wallinius, M., Johansson, P., Lardén, M., & Dernevik, M. (2011). Self-serving cognitive distortions and antisocial behavior among adults and adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(3), 286–301. doi: 10.1177/0093854810396139
  • Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. London: Psychological Corporation.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.