Beyond retribution, restoration and procedural justice: the Big Two of communion and agency in victims’ perspectives on justice

References

• Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751–763. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acorn, A. (2004). Compulsory compassion: A critique of restorative justice. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in western man. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandes, S. A. (1996). Empathy, narrative, and Victim Impact Statements. The University of Chicago Law Review, 63, 361–412. doi: 10.2307/1600234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilz, J. K. (2007). The puzzle of delegated revenge. Boston University Law Review, 87, 1059–1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. San Diego, CA: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolivar, D. (2013). For whom is restorative justice? A mixed-method study on victims and (non-)participation. Restorative Justice, 1(2), 190–214. doi: 10.5235/20504721.1.2.190
   Google Scholar
• Borkman, T. J. (1999). Understanding self-help/mutual aid: Experiential learning in the commons. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. (2006). Rape survivors’ experiences with the legal and medical systems. Do rape victim advocates make a difference? Violence Against Women, 12(1), 30–45. doi: 10.1177/1077801205277539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canetti-Nisim, D., Halperin, E., Sharvit, K., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2009). A new stress-based model of political extremism. Personal exposure to terrorism, psychological distress, and exclusionist political attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(2), 363–389. doi: 10.1177/0022002709333296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleven, I., Lens, K. M. E., & Pemberton, A. (2015). De rol van herstelbemiddeling in het strafrecht. Tilburg: Tilburg University, WODC.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (2014). Reconceptualizing sexual victimization and justice. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M. (2009). Morality in the law: The psychological foundations of citizens’ desires to punish transgressions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5, 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D., Tyler, T. R., & Den Ouden, N. (2005). Managing cooperation via procedural fairness: The mediating influence of self-other merging. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 393–406. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2004.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, R. A. (2001). Punishment, communication and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, R. A. (2003). Restoration and retribution. In A. VonHirsch, J. V. Roberts, A. Bottoms, K. Rodach, & M.Schiff (Eds.), Restorative and criminal justice: Competing or reconcilable paradigms (pp. 43–61). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Erez, E. (2004). Integrating restorative justice principles in adversarial proceedings through Victim Impact Statements. In E. Cape (Ed.), Reconcilable rights? Analysing the tension between victims and defendants (pp. 81–96). London: Legal Action Group.
   Google Scholar
• Erez, E., Kilchling, M., & Wemmers, J. A. (2011). Therapeutic jurisprudence and victim participation in criminal justice: International perspectives. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Errante, A. (1997). Close to home: Comparative perspectives on childhood and community violence. American Journal of Education, 105(4), 355–400. doi: 10.1086/444162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, P. A. (2014). Perceived control over traumatic events. Is it always adaptive? In I. Vanfraechem, A. Pemberton, & F. N. Ndahinda (Eds.), Justice for victims: Perspectives on rights, transition and reconciliation (pp. 265–276). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. (1992). Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groenhuijsen, M. S. (2000). Victim-offender mediation: Legal and procedural safeguards. Experiments and legislation in some European jurisdictions. In The European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice (Ed.), Victim-offender mediation in Europe. Making restorative justice work (pp. 69–81). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groenhuijsen, M. S. (2014). The development of international policy in relation to victims of crime. International Review of Victimology, 20(1), 31–48. doi: 10.1177/0269758013511740
   Google Scholar
• Groenhuijsen, M. S., & Letschert, R. M. (2008). Compilation of international victims’ rights instruments. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal.
   Google Scholar
• Groenhuijsen, M. S., & Pemberton, A. (2009). The EU framework decision on victims. Does hard law make a difference? European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 17(3), 43–59. doi: 10.1163/157181709X400386
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002. doi: 10.1126/science.1137651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammack, P. L., & Pilecki, A. (2012). Narrative as a root metaphor from political psychology. Political Psychology, 33(1), 75–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00859.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, J. L. (2005). Justice from the victim's perspective. Violence Against Women, 11(5), 571–602. doi: 10.1177/1077801205274450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, L. M., Wilson, K. R., Turan, B., Zolotsev, P., Constantino, M. J., & Henderson, L. (2006). How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: A revised circumplex model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 67–86. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, A. V. (1990). The logic of social control. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, G. (2011). Restorative justice: Ideas, values, debates. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kanyangara, P., Rime, B., Paez, D., & Yzerbyt, V. (2014). Trust, individual guilt, collective guilt and dispositions toward reconciliation among Rwandan survivors and prisoners before and after their participation in postgenocide Gacaca courts in Rwanda. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2(1). doi:10.5964/jspp.v2i1.299
   Google Scholar
• Karstedt, S. (2015). The emotion dynamics of transitional justice: An emotion sharing perspective. Emotion Review, 8(1), 50–55. doi: 10.1177/1754073915601214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 60–84. doi: 10.2307/256728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laxminarayan, M. S. (2012). The heterogeneity of crime victims: Variations in procedural and outcome preferences. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal.
   Google Scholar
• Laxminarayan, M. S., Henrichs, J., & Pemberton, A. (2012). Procedural and interactional justice: A comparative study of victims in the Netherlands and New South Wales. European Journal of Criminology, 9(3), 260–275. doi: 10.1177/1477370812439641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laxminarayan, M. S., & Pemberton, A. (2014). The interaction of criminal procedure and outcome. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37, 564–571. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, K. M. E., Pemberton, A., & Bogaerts, S. (2013). Heterogeneity in victim participation: A new perspective on delivering a victim impact statement. European Journal of Criminology, 10(4), 479–495. doi: 10.1177/1477370812469859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, K. M. E., Pemberton, A., Brans, K., Braeken, J., & Bogaerts, S. (2015). Delivering a victim impact statement: Emotionally effective or counterproductive? European Journal of Criminology, 12(1), 17–34. doi: 10.1177/1477370814538778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, K. D. (2015). Agentic and communal social motives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(10), 525–538. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan, R. (2001). Violence and the life course: The consequences of victimization for personal and social development. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 1–22. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maercker, A., & Horn, A. B. (2013). A socio-interpersonal perspective on PTSD: The case for environments and interpersonal processes. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 20, 465–481. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankowski, E. S., & Rappaport, J. (2000). Narrative concepts and analysis in spiritually-based communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(5), 479–493. doi: 10.1002/1520-6629(200009)28:5<479::AID-JCOP2>3.0.CO;2-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by. Personal myths and the making of the self. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 272–295. doi: 10.1177/1745691612464657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P., Hoffman, B. J., Mansfield, E. D., & Day, R. (1996). Themes of agency and communion in significant autobiographical scenes. Journal of Personality, 64(2), 339–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00514.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61(3), 204–217. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoun, R. J., Lind, E. A., Hensler, D. R., Bryant, D. L., & Ebener, P. A. (1988). Alternative adjudication: An evaluation of the New Jersey automobile arbitration program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Okimoto, T. G., Wenzel, M., & Feather, N. T. (2012). Retribution and restoration as general orientations towards justice. European Journal of Personality, 26, 255–275. doi: 10.1002/per.831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orth, U., & Wieland, E. (2006). Anger, hostility, and posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(4), 698–706. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.4.698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Páez, D., Rimé, B., Basabe, N., Wlodarczyk, A., & Zumeta, L. (2015). Psychosocial effects of perceived emotional synchrony in collective gatherings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 711–729. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemberton, A. (2010). The cross-over. An interdisciplinary approach to the study of victims of crime. Tilburg: Tilburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, A. (2012). Too readily dismissed? A victimological perspective on penal populism. In H. Nelen & J. C. Claessen (Eds.), Beyond the death penalty (pp. 105–120). Antwerpen: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, A. (2014). Respecting victims of crime. Key distinctions in a theory of victims rights. In I. Vanfraechem, A. Pemberton, & F. N. Ndahinda (Eds.), Justice for victims. Perspectives on rights, transition and reconciliation (pp. 30–52). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, A. (2015a). Changing frames. Restorative justice in the Netherlands. In D. Bolivar, I. Vanfraechem, & I. Aertsen (Eds.), Victims and restorative justice (pp. 126–152). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, A. (2015b). Victimology with a hammer: The challenge of victimology (Inaugural address). Tilburg: Tilburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, A. (2016). Empathy for victims in criminal justice: Revisiting Susan Bandes in victimology. In H. Conway & J. Stannard (Eds.), Emotional dynamics of law and legal discourse (pp. 105–128). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, A., Aarten, P. G. M., & Mulder, E. (in press). Stories as property. Narrative ownership as a key construct in victimology.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, A., & Reynaers, S. (2011). The controversial nature of victim participation: The case of the victim impact statements. In E. Erez, M. Kilchling, & J. A. Wemmers (Eds.), Therapeutic jurisprudence and victim participation in criminal justice: International perspectives (pp. 229–248). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, A., & Vanfraechem, I. (2015). Victims victimization experience and their need for justice. In D. Bolivar, I. Vanfraechem, & I. Aertsen (Eds.), Victims and restorative justice (pp. 15–47). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2006). It was like a fever. Storytelling in protest and politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 283–305. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport, J. (1993). Narrative studies, personal stories, and identity transformation in the mutual help context. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29(2), 239–256. doi: 10.1177/0021886393292007
   Google Scholar
• Rime, B. (2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60–85. doi: 10.1177/1754073908097189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rime, B., Kanyangara, P., Yzerbyt, V., & Paez, D. (2011). The impact of Gacaca tribunals in Rwanda: Psychosocial effects of participation in a truth and reconciliation process after a genocide. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 695–706. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V. (2009). Listening to the crime victim: Evaluating victim input at sentencing and parole. Crime and Justice, 38, 347–412. doi: 10.1086/599203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V., & Erez, E. (2004). Communication in sentencing: Exploring the expressive function of Victim Impact Statements. International Review of Victimology, 10, 223–244. doi: 10.1177/026975800401000302
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (2007). Intuitions of justice: Implications for criminal law and criminal policy. Southern California Law Review, 81, 1–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossner, M. (2011). Reintegrative ritual: Restorative justice and micro-sociology. In S. Karstedt, I. Loader, & H. Strang (Eds.), Emotions, crime and justice (pp. 169–192). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rossner, M. (2014). Just emotions. Rituals of restorative justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarat, A. (1997). Vengeance, victims and the identities of law. Social and Legal Studies, 6(2), 163–189. doi: 10.1177/096466399700600201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheingold, S. A., Olson, T., & Pershing, J. (1994). Sexual violence, victim advocacy, and republican criminology: Washington State’s Community Protection Act. Law & Society Review, 28(4), 729–764. doi: 10.2307/3053993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simantov-Nachlieli, I., Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2013). Individuals’ and groups’ motivation to restore their impaired identity dimensions following conflict: Evidence and implications. Social Psychology, 44(2), 129–137. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., & Wisneski, D. C. (2012). Justice theory and research: A social functionalist perspective. In J. Suls & H. Tennen (Eds.), The handbook of psychology (pp. 674–715). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, H. (2002). Repair or revenge: Victims and restorative justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, H., Sherman, L., Angel, C. M., Woods, D. J., Bennett, S., Newbury-Birch, D., & Inkpen, N. (2006). Victim evaluations of face-to-face restorative justice conferences: A quasi-experimental analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 281–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00451.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357. doi: 10.1086/652233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 84–99. doi: 10.1177/0002716203262627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Camp, T., & De Mesmaecker, V. (2014). Procedural justice for victims of crime. Are victim impact statements and victim-offender mediation rising to the challenge?. In I. Vanfraechem, A. Pemberton, & F. N. Ndahinda (Eds.), Justice for victims. Perspectives on rights, transition and reconciliation (pp. 277–299). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. (2007). World of crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vidmar, N. (2000). Retribution and revenge. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 31–63). New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Vollhardt, J. R. (2009). Altruism born of suffering and prosocial behavior following adverse life events: A review and conceptualization. Social Justice Research, 22, 53–97. doi: 10.1007/s11211-009-0088-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Verhulst, J. (2006). Towards ‘New emotional movements’? A comparative exploration into a specific movement type. Social Movement Studies, 5(3), 275–304. doi: 10.1080/14742830600991651
   Google Scholar
• Wemmers, J. A. (1996). Victims in the criminal justice system. A study into the treatment of victims and its effects on their attitudes and behaviour (PhD). Leiden University, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior, 32(5), 375–389. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10979–007-9116-6/fulltext.html doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9116-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkel, F. W. (2007). Posttraumatic anger. Missing link in the wheel of fortune. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal.
   Google Scholar
• Zitek, E. M., Jordan, A. H., Monin, B., & Leach, F. R. (2010). Victim entitlement to behave selfishly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 245–255. doi: 10.1037/a0017168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar