Are reality monitoring differences between truthful and deceptive autobiographical accounts affected by standardisation for word-count and the presence of others?

References

• Adams, S. H., & Jarvis, J. P. (2006). Indicators of veracity and deception: An analysis of written statements made to police. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 13(1), 1–22. doi:10.1558/sll.2006.13.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amado, B. G., Arce, R., & Fariña, F. (2015). Undeutsch hypothesis and Criteria-based Content Analysis: A meta-analytic review. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 7(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, C. T., & O’Callaghan, J. (2008). Judging the accuracy of children’s recall: A statement-level analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 331–345. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.7.4.331
   Google Scholar
• Barnier, A. J., Sharman, S. J., McKay, L., & Sporer, S. L. (2005). Discriminating adults’ genuine, imagined, and deceptive accounts of positive and negative childhood events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 985–1001. doi: 10.1002/acp.1139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., & Vrij, A. (2014). Using an example statement increases information but does not increase accuracy of CBCA, RM, and SCAN. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 11(2), 151–163. doi: 10.1002/jip.1409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C. K., & Memon, A. (2002). Interviewing techniques and the assessment of statement credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 287–300. doi:10.1002/acp.788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell, L. H., Miller, H. A., Miller, R. S., & Lyons Jr, P. M. (2006). US police officers’ knowledge regarding behaviors indicative of deception: Implications for eradicating erroneous beliefs through training. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(5), 489–503. doi:10.1080/10683160500254839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. L., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilmon, R. (2009). Between thinking and speaking – linguistic tools for detecting a fabrication. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1152–1170. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driskell, T., Blickensderfer, E. L., & Salas, E. (2013). Is three a crowd? Examining rapport in investigative interviews. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 17(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1037/a0029686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elntib, S. (2016). Verbal lie-detection using the reality monitoring approach: An analysis of its effectiveness and moderating factors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Liverpool, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Elntib, S., Wagstaff, G. F., & Wheatcroft, J. M. (2014). The role of account length in detecting deception in written and orally produced autobiographical accounts using reality monitoring. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 12, 185–198. doi: 10.1002/jip.1420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garry, M., Manning, C. G., Loftus, E. F., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 208–214. doi:10.3758/BF03212420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnisci, A., Caso, L., & Vrij, A. (2010). Have you made up your story? The effect of suspicion and liars’ strategies on reality monitoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 762–773. doi:10.1002acp.1584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Landström, S. (2006). Children recalling an event repeatedly: Effects on RM and CBCA scores. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 81–98. doi: 10.1348/135532505X49620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpster, T., Adams, S. H., & Jarvis, J. P. (2009). Analyzing 911 homicide calls for indicators of guilt or innocence. Homicide Studies, 13(1), 69–93. doi: 10.1177/1088767908328073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauch, V., Blandón-Gitlin, I., Masip, J., & Sporer, S. L. (2014). Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 307–342. doi:10.1177/1088868314556539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371–376. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–29. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Hovav, M. (1997). Criterion-based content analysis: A field validation study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21(3), 255–264. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(96)00170-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. S., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Interviewing children with the cognitive interview: Assessing the reliability of statements based on observed and imagined events. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 49–57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00434.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal, S., Vrij, A., Warmelink, L., Vernham, Z., & Fisher, R. P. (2015). You cannot hide your telephone lies: Providing a model statement as an aid to detect deception in insurance telephone calls. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20(1), 129–146. doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2002). Suspects, lies and videotape: An analysis of authentic, high-stakes liars. Law and Human Behaviour, 26, 365–376. doi: 10.1023/A:1015332606792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masip, J., Bethencourt, M., Lucas, G., Segundo, M. S.-S., & Herrero, C. (2012). Deception detection from written accounts. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53(2), 103–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00931.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masip, J., Sporer, S., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2005). The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 11, 99–122. doi: 10.1080/10683160410001726356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Fraser, J., Colwell, K., Odinot, G., & Mastroberardino, S. (2010). Distinguishing truthful from invented accounts using reality monitoring criteria. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 177–194. doi:10.1348/135532508X401382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2012). Does the truth come out in the writing? Scan as a lie-detection tool. Law and Human Behaviour, 36(1), 68–76. doi: 10.1037/h0093965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paddock, J. R., Noel, M., Terronova, S., Eber, H. W., Manning, C. G., & Loftus, E. F. (1999). Imagination inflation and the perils of guided visualization. Journal of Psychology, 133, 581–595. doi: 10.1080/00223989909599764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behaviour, 20, 443–459. doi: 10.1007/BF01498980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santtila, P., Roppola, H., & Niemi, P. (1998). Assessing the truthfulness of witness statements made by children (aged 7/8, 10/11, and 13/14) employing scales derived from Johnson and Raye’s model of reality monitoring. Expert Evidence, 6, 273–289. doi: 10.1023/A:1008930821076
   Google Scholar
• Santtila, P., Roppola, H., Runtti, M., & Niemi, P. (2000). Assessment of child witness statements using Criteria-based Content Analysis (CBCA): The effects of age, verbal ability, and interviewer’s emotional style. Psychology, Crime and Law, 6(3), 159–179. doi: 10.1080/10683160008409802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373–397. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199710)11:5<373::AID-ACP461>3.0.CO;2-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L., & Sharman, S. J. (2006). Should I believe this? Reality monitoring of accounts of self-experienced and invented recent and distant autobiographical events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 837–854. doi: 10.1002/acp.1234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömwall, L. A., Bengtsson, L., Leander, L., & Granhag, P. A. (2004). Assessing children’s statements: The impact of a repeated experience on CBCA and RM ratings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 653–668. doi: 10.1002/acp.1021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Children’s repeated lies and truths: Effects on adults’ judgements and reality monitoring scores. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 345–356. doi:10.1002/acp.1288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Brinke, L., & Porter, S. (2012). Cry me a river: Identifying the behavioral consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception. Law and Human Behavior, 36(6), 469–477. doi:10.1037/h0093929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troyer, A. K., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (1997). Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: Evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 11, 138–146. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.11.1.138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar, G., Arciuli, J., & Mallard, D. (2012). Use of ‘um’ in the deceptive speech of a convicted murderer. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(1), 83–95. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2008a). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2008b). Nonverbal dominance versus verbal accuracy in lie-detection: A plea to change police practice. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 35, 1323–1336. doi: 10.1177/0093854808321530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004). Let me inform you how to tell a convincing story: CBCA and reality monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching, and deception. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 36, 113–126. doi:10.1037/h0087222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K. P., & Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behaviour. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 24, 239–263. doi: 10.1023/A:1006610329284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Evans, H., Akehurst, L., & Mann, S. (2004). Rapid judgements in assessing verbal and nonverbal cues: Their potential for deception researchers and lie-detection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 283–296. doi: 10.1002/acp.964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie-detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(3), 89–121. doi: 10.1177/1529100610390861
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2015). Verbal lie detection tools: Statement validity analysis, reality monitoring, and scientific content analysis. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Detecting deception: Current challenges and cognitive approaches (pp. 3–35). Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001a). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 187–203. doi: 10.1002/1099-0720(200103/04)15:2<187::AID-ACP696>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001b). Who killed my relative? Police officers’ ability to detect real-life, high-stakes lies. Psychology Crime and Law, 7, 119–132. doi: 10.1080/10683160108401791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behaviour, 31, 499–518. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9066-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff, G. F., Wheatcroft, J., Cole, J. C., Brunas-Wagstaff, J., Blackmore, V., & Pilkington, A. (2008). Some cognitive and neuropsychological aspects of social inhibition and facilitation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 828–846. doi: 10.1080/09541440701469749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walczyk, J. J., Griffith, D. A., Yates, R., Visconte, S. R., Simoneaux, B., & Harris, L. L. (2012). Lie-detection by inducing cognitive load eye movements and other cues to the false answers of ‘witnesses’ to crimes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(7), 887–909. doi: 10.1177/0093854812437014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. M., Talwar, V., Lindsay, R. C. L., Bala, N., & Lee, K. (2014). Is the truth in your words? Distinguishing children’s deceptive and truthful statements. Journal of Criminology, 2014, 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2014/547519
   Google Scholar
• Wilson VanVoorhis, C. R., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3, 43–50. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3681.269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Compresence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 35–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar