496
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Differential effects of general versus cued invitations on children’s reports of a repeated event episode

, , , &
Pages 794-811 | Received 18 Jun 2016, Accepted 04 Apr 2017, Published online: 11 May 2017

References

  • Agnew, S., Powell, M. B., & Snow, P. (2006). An examination of the questioning styles of police officers and caregivers when interviewing children with intellectual disabilities. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 35–53. doi: 10.1348/135532505X68494
  • Brown, D. A., Lamb, M. E., Lewis, C., Pipe, M., Orbach, Y., & Wolfman, M. (2013). The NICHD investigative interview protocol: An analogue study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19, 367–382. doi: 10.1037/a0035143
  • Brubacher, S., Glisic, U., Roberts, K., & Powell, M. (2011). Children's ability to recall unique aspects of one occurrence of a repeated event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 351–358. doi: 10.1002/acp.1696
  • Brubacher, S. P., Malloy, L. C., Lamb, M. E., & Roberts, K. P. (2013). How do interviewers and children discuss individual occurrences of alleged repeated abuse in forensic interviews? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 443–450. doi: 10.1002/acp.2920
  • Brubacher, S. P., Poole, D. A., & Dickinson, J. J. (2015). The use of ground rules in investigative interviews with children: A synthesis and call for research. Developmental Review, 36, 15–33. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2015.01.001
  • Brubacher, S., Roberts, K., & Powell, M. (2012). Retrieval of episodic versus generic information: Does the order of recall affect the amount and accuracy of details reported by children about repeated events? Developmental Psychology, 48, 111–122. doi: 10.1037/a0025864
  • Brubacher, S., Roberts, K., & Powell, M. (2014). Recommendations for interviewing children about repeated experiences. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 20, 325–335. doi: 10.1037/law0000011
  • Burrows, K. S., & Powell, M. (2013). Prosecutors’ recommendations for improving child witness statements about sexual abuse. Policing and Society, 24, 189–207. doi: 10.1080/10439463.2013.784305
  • Connolly, D. A., & Gordon, H. M. (2014). Can order of general and specific memory prompts help children to recall an instance of a repeated event that was different from the others? Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 852–864. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2014.885969
  • Connolly, D. A., Gordon, H. M., Woiwod, D. M., & Price, H. L. (2016). What children recall about a repeated event when one instance is different from the others. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1038–1051. doi: 10.1037/dev0000137
  • Connolly, D. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (2001). The influence of suggestions on children’s reports of a unique experience versus an instance of a repeated experience. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 205–223. doi: 10.1002/1099-0720(200103/04)15:2<205::AID-ACP698>3.0.CO;2-F
  • Connolly, D. A., Price, H. L., Lavoie, J. A. A., & Gordon, H. M. (2008). Perceptions and predictors of children's credibility of a unique event and an instance of a repeated event. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 92–112. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9083-3
  • Davidson, D., & Hoe, S. (1993). Children′ s recall and recognition memory for typical and atypical actions in script-based stories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 104–126. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1993.1005
  • Dent, H. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1979). An experimental study on the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 18, 41–51. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1979.tb00302.x
  • Evans, A. D., & Roberts, K. P. (2009). The effects of different paraphrasing styles on the quality of reports from young child witnesses. Psychology, Crime and Law, 15, 531–546. doi: 10.1080/10683160802385398
  • Evans, A. D., Roberts, K. P., Price, H. L., & Stefak, C. P. (2010). The use of paraphrasing in investigative interviews. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 585–592. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.01.008
  • Farrar, M. J., & Boyer-Pennington, M. E. (1999). Remembering specific episodes of a scripted event. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 266–288. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2507
  • Feltis, B. B., Powell, M. B., Snow, P. C., & Hughes-Scholes, C. H. (2010). An examination of the association between interviewer question type and story-grammar detail in child witness interviews about abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 407–413. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.019
  • Fivush, R. (1984). Learning about school: The development of kindergartners’ school scripts. Child Development, 55, 1697–1709. doi: 10.2307/1129917
  • Flin, R., Boon, J., Knox, A., & Bull, R. (1992). The effect of a five-month delay on children's and adults’ eyewitness memory. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 323–336. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02444.x
  • Horowitz, S. (2009). Direct mixed and open questions in child interviewing: An analog study. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 135–147. doi: 10.1348/135532508X298441
  • Hudson, J., Fivush, R., & Kuebli, J. (1992). Scripts and episodes: The development of event memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 483–505. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350060604
  • Hudson, J. (1988). Children’s memory for atypical actions in script-based stories: Evidence for a disruption effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 159–173. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(88)90055-0
  • Hudson, J. (1990). Constructive processing in children’s event memory. Developmental Psychology, 26, 180–187. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.2.180
  • Hudson, J., & Nelson, K. (1986). Repeated encounters of a similar kind: Effects of familiarity on children’s autobiographic memory. Cognitive Development, 1, 253–271. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(86)80004-1
  • Lamb, M. E., La Rooy, D. J., Malloy, L. C., & Katz, C. (2011). Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD investigative interview protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1201–1231. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
  • Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Warren, A. R., Esplin, P. W., & Hershkowitz, I. (2007). Enhancing performance: Factors affecting the informativeness of you witnesses. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology: Volume 1: Memory for events (pp. 429–452). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbarum.
  • Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (2000). Effects of age and delay on the amount of information provided by alleged sex abuse victims in investigative interviews. Child Development, 71, 1586–1596. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00250
  • Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., Stewart, H., & Mitchell, S. (2003). Age differences in young children’s responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 926–934. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.5.926
  • Larsson, A. S., & Lamb, M. E. (2009). Making the most of information-gathering interviews with children. Infant and Child Development, 18, 1–16, doi: 10.1002/icd.573
  • Means, B., & Lofus, E. F. (1991). When personal history repeats itself: Decomposing memories for recurring events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 297–318. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350050402
  • Oates, K., & Shrimpton, S. (1991). Children's memories for stressful and non-stressful events. Medicine, Science and the Law, 31, 4–10. doi: 10.1177/002580249103100102
  • Orbach, Y., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Enhancing children’s narratives in investigative interviews. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1631–1648. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00207-6
  • Pezdek, K., Finger, K., & Hodge, D. (1997). Planting false childhood memories: The role of event plausibility. Psychological Science, 8, 437–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00457.x
  • Pipe, M., Gee, S., Wilson, C. J. C., & Egerton, J. M. (1999). Children's recall 1 or 2 years after an event. Developmental Psychology, 35, 781–789. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.35.3.781
  • Powell, M. B., Fisher, R. P., & Wright, R. (2005). Investigative interviewing. In N. Brewer & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law an empirical perspective (pp. 11–42). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Powell, M. B. (2014, July). Recommendations for improving the competency of investigative interviewers of children. Paper presented at the 28th International Congress of Applied Psychology, Paris, France.
  • Powell, M. B., Roberts, K., Ceci, S., & Hembrooke, H. (1999). The effects of repeated experience on children’s suggestibility. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1462–1477. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.6.1462
  • Powell, M. B., Roberts, K., & Guadagno, B. (2007). Particularisation of child abuse offences: Common problems when questioning child witnesses. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 19, 64–74.
  • Powell, M. B., Roberts, K. P., & Thomson, D. M. (2000). The effect of a suggestive interview on children's memory of a repeated event: Does it matter whether suggestions are linked to a particular incident? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 7, 182–191. doi: 10.1080/13218710009524984
  • Powell, M. B., & Snow, P. C. (2007). Guide to questioning children during the free- narrative phase of an investigative interview. Australian Psychologist, 42, 57–65. doi: 10.1080/00050060600976032
  • Powell, M. B., & Thomson, D. (1996). Children's memory of an occurrence of a repeated event: Effects of age, repetition, and retention interval across three question types. Child Development, 67, 1988–2004. doi: 10.2307/1131605
  • Powell, M. B., & Thomson, D. (1997). Contrasting memory for temporal-source and memory for content in children's discrimination of repeated events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 339–360. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199708)11:4<339::AID-ACP460>3.0.CO;2-O
  • Powell, M. B., & Thomson, D. (2003). Improving children's recall of an occurrence of a repeated event: Is it a matter of helping them to generate options? Law and Human Behavior, 27, 365–384. doi: 10.1023/A:1024032932556
  • Powell, M. B., Wright, R., & Hughes-Scholes, C. H. (2011). Contrasting the perceptions of child testimony experts, prosecutors and police officers regarding individual child abuse interviews. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 18, 33–43. doi: 10.1080/13218710903566995
  • Price, H. L., Connolly, D. A., & Gordon, H. M. (2006). Children’s memory for complex autobiographical events: Does spacing of repeated instances matter? Memory, 14, 977–989. doi: 10.1080/09658210601009005
  • Roberts, K. P., Brubacher, S. P., Powell, M. B., & Price, H. L. (2011). Practice narratives. In Lamb, M. E., La Rooy, D. J., Malloy, L. C., & Katz, C. (Eds.), Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (pp. 129–146). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Roberts, K. P. (2002). Children’s ability to distinguish between memories from multiple sources: Implications for the quality and accuracy of eyewitness statements. Developmental Review, 22, 403–435. doi: 10.1016/S0273-2297(02)00005-9
  • Schneider, L., Price, H. L., Roberts, K. P., & Hedrick, A. M. (2011). Children’s episodic and generic reports of alleged abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 862–870. doi: 10.1002/acp.1759
  • Smith, K., & Milne, R. (2011). Planning the interview. In Lamb, M. E., La Rooy, D. J., Malloy, L. C., & Katz, C. (Eds.), Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (2nd ed., pp. 87–108). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Snow, P. C., Powell, M. B., & Murfett, R. (2009). Getting the story from child witnesses: Exploring the application of a story grammar framework. Psychology, Crime and Law, 15, 555–568. doi: 10.1080/10683160802409347
  • Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., Redlich, A., & Sunshine, N. (1996). The relation between investigative utterance types and the informativeness of child witnesses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 17, 439–451. doi: 10.1016/S0193-3973(96)90036-2
  • S v. R. (1989). 168 CLR 266.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.