Parents’ knowledge and attitudes about youths’ interrogation rights

References

• Borhnstedt, G. W., Freeman, H. E., & Smith, T. (1981). Adult perspectives on children’s autonomy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 443–462. doi: 10.1086/268680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeking, J. (2008). Parental involvement in youth justice proceedings (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International, University of Toronto, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, C., & Cauffman, E. (2017). What they don’t know can hurt them: Mothers’ legal knowledge and youth re-offending. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(2), 141–153. doi: 10.1037/law0000112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, H. M. D. (2014). Police interviewing and interrogation of juvenile suspects: A descriptive examination of actual cases. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 271–282. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, H. M. D. (2017). Applying the lessons of developmental psychology to the study of juvenile interrogations: New directions for research, policy, and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23, 118–130. doi: 10.1037/law0000120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, V. G., & Zapf, P. A. (2008). Psychiatric patients’ comprehension of Miranda rights. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 390–405. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9099-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, D. M., Peterson-Badali, M., & Ruck, M. D. (2006). The relationship between maternal attitudes and young people’s attitudes toward children’s rights. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 193–207. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Legal socialization of children and adolescents. Social Justice Research, 18, 217–241. doi: 10.1007/s11211-005-6823-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber, H. B. (2004). The role of the parent/guardian in juvenile custodial interrogations: Friend or foe? American Criminal Law Review, 41, 1277–1312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707. (1979).
   Google Scholar
• Feld, B. C. (2013). Kids, cops, and confessions: Inside the interrogation room. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, I. B., Lally, S. J., & Sexton, J. E. (2012). The Grisso tests for assessing understanding and appreciation of Miranda warnings with a forensic sample. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30, 673–692. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, P., Addie, S., Adams, B., & Firestone, K. (2011). Trying juveniles as adults: An analysis of state transfer laws and reporting. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Grisso, T., & Ring, M. (1979). Parents’ attitudes toward juveniles’ rights in interrogation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 6, 211–226. doi: 10.1177/009385487900600301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisso, T., Steinberg, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., Scott, E., Graham, S., & Lexcen, F. (2003). Juveniles’ competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents’ and adults’ capacities as trial defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 27(4), 333–363. doi: 10.1023/A:1024065015717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisso, T. (1981). Juveniles’ waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Grisso, T. (1998). Instruments for assessing understanding and appreciation of Miranda rights. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange.
   Google Scholar
• In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1. (1967).
   Google Scholar
• J.D.B. v. North Carolina, 564 U.S. __. (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. B., Citron-Lippmann, K., Massey, C., Raghavan, C., & Kavanagh, A. (2015). Interrogation expectations: Individual and race/ethnic group variation among an adult sample. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 13, 16–29. doi: 10.1080/15377938.2014.936641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juvenile Justice Geography, Policy, Practice & Statistics. (nd). Developed by the National Center for Juvenile Justice (NCJJ), with funding from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. (2012). Why confessions trump innocence. American Psychologist, 67, 431–445. doi: 10.1037/a0028212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, K. (2006). Waiving childhood goodbye: How juvenile courts fail to protect children from unknowing, unintelligent, and involuntary waivers of Miranda rights. Wisconsin Law Review, 2006, 431–478.
   Google Scholar
• Krzewinski, L. M. (2002). But I didn’t do it: Protecting the rights of juveniles during interrogation. Boston College Third World Law Journal, 22, 355–387.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson-Badali, M., & Broeking, J. (2009). Parents’ involvement in the youth justice system: A view from the trenches. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 51, 255–270. doi: 10.3138/cjccj.51.2.255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson-Badali, M., Morine, S. L., Ruck, M. D., & Slonim, N. (2004). Predictors of maternal and early adolescent attitudes toward children’s nurturance and self-determination rights. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24, 159–179. doi: 10.1177/0272431603262667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson-Badali, M., & Ruck, M. D. (2008). Studying children’s perspectives on self-determination and nurturance rights: Issues and challenges. Journal of Social Issues, 64(4), 749–769. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00587.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson-Badali, M., Ruck, M. D., & Ridley, E. (2003). College students’ attitudes toward children’s nurturance and self-determination rights. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 730–755. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01922.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Police and Criminal Evidence Act. (1984). c. 60, pt. V (Eng.).
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Blackwood, H. L., Fiduccia, C. E., Steadham, J. A., Drogin, E. Y., & Rogstad, J. E. (2012). Juvenile Miranda warnings: Perfunctory rituals or procedural safeguards? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 229–249. doi: 10.1177/0093854811431934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Harrison, K. S., Hazelwood, L. L., & Sewell, K. W. (2007). Knowing and intelligent: A study of Miranda warnings in mentally disordered defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 401–418. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9070-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1978). Attitudes toward children’s rights: Nurturance or self-determination? Journal of Social Issues, 34, 59–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1978.tb01029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruck, M. D., Peterson-Badali, M., & Day, D. M. (2002). Adolescents’ and mothers’ understanding of children’s rights in the home. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 373–398. doi: 10.1111/1532-7795.00038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State v. Presha, 748 A.2d (N.J. 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, L. (2014). Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence. Boston, MA: Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, S., Cleary, H. M. D., Woolard, J. L., & Michel, J. (in press). Adolescents’ legal socialization: Effects of interrogation and Miranda knowledge on legitimacy, cynicism, and procedural justice. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Klaver, J., & Roesch, R. (2005). Legal decisions of preadolescent and adolescent defendants: Predictors of confessions, pleas, communication with attorneys, and appeals. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 253–277. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-3613-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Roesch, R., & Zapf, P. A. (2002). An examination of the relationship between competency to stand trial, competency to waive interrogation rights, and psychopathology. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 481–506. doi: 10.1023/A:1020299804821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolard, J. L., Cleary, H. M. D., Harvell, S. A. S., & Chen, R. (2008). Examining adolescents’ and their parents’ conceptual and practical knowledge of police interrogation: A family dyad approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 685–698. doi: 10.1007/s10964-008-9288-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelle, H., Romaine, C. L. R., & Goldstein, N. E. S. (2015). Juveniles’ Miranda comprehension: Understanding, appreciation, and totality of circumstances factors. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 281–293. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar