Applying the Verifiability Approach in an international airport setting

References

• Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669–679. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. W. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blandón-Gitlin, I., Fenn, E., Masip, J., & Yoo, A. H. (2014). Cognitive-load approaches to detect deception: Searching for cognitive mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(9), 441–444. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochner, S. (Ed.). (1982). Cultures in contact: Studies in cross-cultural interaction. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214–234. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F., & Fahey, W. E. (1987). False suspicion and the misperception of deceit. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 41–46. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00759.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F. Jr, Omar, A., Mahmoud, A., & Bonser, R. N. (1990). Lie detection across cultures. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14(3), 189–204. doi: 10.1007/BF00996226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boscovic, I., Boogaard, G., Merckelbach, H., Vrij, A., & Hope, L. (2017). The Verifiability Approach to detection of malingered physical symptoms. Psychology, Crime, & Law. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2017.1302585.
   Google Scholar
• Boscovic, I., Tejada-Gallardo, G., Merckelbach, H., Vrij, A., & Hope, L. (2017). Verifiability on the run: An experimental study on the Verifiability Approach to malingered symptoms. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. H. W., & Broadhurst, R. (2005). The detection of deception: The effects of first and second language on lie detection ability. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12(1), 107–118. doi: 10.1375/pplt.2005.12.1.107
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. (1872). 1965. The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Marry.
   Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., O’Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. G. (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10(3), 263–266. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., & O’Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46(9), 913–920. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.9.913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ember, C. R., & Ember, M. (1998). Cross-cultural research. In H. R. Bernard (Ed.), Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology (pp. 647–687). Walnut Creek: CA7 AltaMira.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, A., & Lacerda, F. (2007). Charlatanry in forensic speech science: A problem to be taken seriously. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 14(2), 169–193. doi: 10.1558/ijsll.v14i2.169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, C. L., Barron, K. W., Byrd-Craven, J., Clark, K. F., & Winter, A. S. (2013). Vocal indices of stress: A review. Journal of Voice, 27(3), 390.e21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(1), 60–74. doi: 10.1177/0022022105282295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office. (2013). TSA should limit future funding for behavior detection activities (GAO publication no. 14-159). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Harnsberger, J. D., & Hollien, H. (2016). Assessing deception by voice analysis: Part II: The LVA. Investigative Sciences Journal, 8(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Luke, T. (2014). Strategic use of evidence during investigative interviews: The state of the science. In D. C. Raskin, C. R. Honts, & J. C. Kircher (Eds.), Credibility assessment: Scientific research and applications (pp. 1–31). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30(5), 603–619. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9053-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, A. C., Vrij, A., Nahari, G., & Ludwig, K. (2016). Applying the Verifiability Approach to insurance claims settings: Exploring the effect of the information protocol. Legal and Criminological Psychology, n/a–n/a. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrichs, N., Rapee, R. M., Alden, L. A., Bögels, S., Hofmann, S. G., Ja Oh, K., & Sakano, Y. (2006). Cultural differences in perceived social norms and social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(8), 1187–1197. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honts, C. R., Hartwig, M., Kleinman, S. M., & Meissner, C. A. (2009). Credibility assessment at portals: Portals committee report. Final Report of the Portals Committee to the Defense Academy for Credibility Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Jupe, L. M., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Nahari, G., & Harvey, A. (2017). Fading lies: Applying the Verifiability Approach after a period of delay. Manuscript under preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Jupe, L. M., Vrij, A., Nahari, G., Leal, S., & Mann, S. A. (2016). The lies we live: Using the Verifiability Approach to detect lying about occupation. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 13(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschenbaum, A. A. (2015). The social foundations of airport security. Journal of Air Transport Management, 48, 34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leins, D., Fisher, R., & Ross, S. (2013). Exploring liars’ strategies for creating deceptive reports. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 18(1), 141–151. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02041.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Anders, L. N., Banas, J., Baum, K. L., Endo, K., Hu, A. D., & Wong, N. C. (2000). Norms, expectations, and deception: A norm violation model of veracity judgments. Communications Monographs, 67(2), 123–137. doi: 10.1080/03637750009376500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccario, J. (2013). Aviation security and nonverbal behavior. In D. Matsumoto, M. G. Frank, & H. S. Hwang (Eds.), Nonverbal communication: Science and applications (pp. 147–154). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, D., Hwang, H. C., & Sandoval, V. A. (2015a). Cross-language applicability of linguistic features associated with veracity and deception. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(4), 229–241. doi: 10.1007/s11896-014-9155-0
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, D., Hwang, H. C., & Sandoval, V. A. (2015b). Ethnic similarities and differences in linguistic indicators of veracity and lying in a moderately high stakes scenario. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(1), 15–26. doi: 10.1007/s11896-013-9137-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLay, L. A., Lee, A. J., & Jacobson, S. H. (2010). Risk-based policies for airport security checkpoint screening. Transportation Science, 44(3), 333–349. doi: 10.1287/trsc.1090.0308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. L. (2010). Spot program: Hello racial profiling, goodbye fourth amendment. The University of Maryland Law Journal on Race, Religion, Gender & Class, 10(2), 289–339.
   Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., Leal, S., Vrij, A., Warmelink, L., & Vernham, Z. (2014). Did somebody see it? Applying the Verifiability Approach to insurance claims interviews. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 11, 237–243. doi: 10.1002/jip.1417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2012). Does the truth come out in the writing? Scan as a lie detection tool. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 68–76. doi:10.1007/s10979-011-9264-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2014a). Exploiting liars’ verbal strategies by examining the verifiability of details. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19(2), 227–239. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02069.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2014b). The Verifiability Approach: Countermeasures facilitate its ability to discriminate between truths and lies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(1), 122–128. doi: 10.1002/acp.2974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., & Vrij, A. (2014a). Are you as good as me at telling a story? Individual differences in interpersonal reality monitoring. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(6), 573–583. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2013.793771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., & Vrij, A. (2014b). Can I borrow your alibi? The applicability of the Verifiability Approach to the case of an alibi witness. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(2), 89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., & Vrij, A. (2014). Can I borrow your alibi? The applicability of the verifiability approach to the case of an alibi witness. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(2), 89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., & Vrij, A. (2015). Can someone fabricate verifiable details when planning in advance? It all depends on the crime scenario. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(10), 987–999. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2015.1077248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council, Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M., & Gilbey, A. (2011). The screening of passengers by observation techniques programme: Analyzing the issues. Aviation Security International, 17, 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, R. W. (2015). Cost-effective airport security policy. In S. Hakim, G. Albert, & Y. Shiftan (Eds.), Securing transportation systems (pp. 205–231). John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781119078203.ch11
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expressions? A review of the cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 102. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samovar, L., Porter, R., McDaniel, E., & Roy, C. (2015). Communication between cultures. Boston: Nelson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sarabi, H. (1975). Introduction to the study of Arab society. Jerusalem, Israel: Salah Eddin Publications. Arabic Version.
   Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., & Vigliocco, G. (2015). Speech production, psychology of [repr.]. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., vol. 23, pp. 255–258). New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519–542. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., & Miller, F. D. (1978). Limits on perception of cognitive processes: A reply to Nisbett and Wilson. Psychological Review, 85(4), 355–362. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.4.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sooniste, T., Granhag, P. A., Knieps, M., & Vrij, A. (2013). True and false intentions: Asking about the past to detect lies about the future. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(8), 673–685. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2013.793333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., Larner, S., Conchie, S., & Van der Zee, S. (2014). Cross-cultural deception detection. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Deception detection: Current challenges and cognitive approaches. (pp. 175–202). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J., Larner, S., Conchie, S. M., & van der Zee, S. (2015) Cross Cultural Deception Detection. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Detecting Deception: Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches (pp. 175–201). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vernham, Z., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Nahari, G. (2017). Applying the Verifiability Approach to the detection of deception in alibi witness situations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. Verbal lie detection tools: Statement Validity Analysis, Reality Monitoring and Scientific Content Analysis. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Detecting Deception: Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches (pp. 2–35). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2008). A cognitive load approach to lie detection. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 5(1–2), 39–43. doi: 10.1002/jip.82
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2011). Lying about flying: The first experiment to detect false intent. Pyschology, Crime & Law, 17(7), 611–620. doi: 10.1080/10683160903418213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2011). A comparison between lying about intentions and past activities: Verbal cues and detection accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 212–218. doi: 10.1002/acp.1665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Nahari, G., Isitt, R., & Leal, S. (2016). Using the verifiability lie detection approach in an insurance claim setting. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 13(3), 183–197. doi: 10.1002/jip.1458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., Jundi, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions. Acta Psychologica, 141, 178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Polish vs. English. Journal of Pragmatics, 9(2), 145–178. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(85)90023-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar