Attitudes, anger, and nullification instructions influence jurors’ verdicts in euthanasia cases

References

• Baenen, J. (2013, March 23). Thomas Goodwin, former president of Final Exit Network, has charges in Doreen Dunn case dismissed. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/23/thomas-goodwin-chargesdismissed_n_2939495.html
   Google Scholar
• Bandes, S. A., & Blumenthal, J. A. (2012). Emotion and the law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 161–181. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (Ct. App. 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Bartling v. Superior Court, 163 Cal. App. 3d 186, 209 Cal. Rptr. 220 (Ct. App. 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45–62. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420240104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91. doi: 10.1023/A:1022326807441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H., Golding, J. M., Neuschatz, J. S., Kimbrough, C. D., Reed, K., Magyarics, C., & Luecht, K. (2017). Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 13–28. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H., & Greene, E. (2011). Jury decision making: Implications for and from psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 63–67. doi: 10.1177/0963721410397282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Perceptions of children’s credibility in sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702–732. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00608.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottoms, B. L., Peter-Hagene, L. C., Stevenson, M. C., Wiley, T. R. A., Mitchell, T. S., & Goodman, G. S. (2014). Explaining gender differences in jurors’ reactions to child sexual assault cases. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 32, 789–812. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouvia v. Superior Court, 179 Cal. App. 3d 1127, 225 Cal. Rptr. 297 (Ct. App. 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Bray, R. M., & Noble, A. M. (1978). Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1424–1430. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, D. A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2006). Gruesome evidence and emotion: Anger, blame, and jury decisionmaking. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 183–202. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9027-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caddell, D. P., & Newton, R. R. (1995). Euthanasia: American attitudes toward the physician’s role. Social Science and Medicine, 40, 1671–1681. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00287-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, J. K., Paquette Boots, D., & Heide, K. M. (2003). Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded. Justice Quarterly, 20, 65–93. doi: 10.1080/07418820300095461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins-Chobanian, S. (2009). Analysis of Paul Butler's race-based jury nullification and his call to black jurors and the African American community. Journal of Black Studies, 39, 508–527. doi: 10.1177/0021934706297878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324–336. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deitz, S. R., Blackwell, K. T., Daley, P. C., & Bentley, B. J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 372–384. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Rucker, D. D. (2000). Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: The role of emotion specificity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 397–416. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., & Caughlin, D. E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 109–134. doi:10.1037/law0000006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Dunford, B. B., Seying, R., & Pryce, J. (2001). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 622–727. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.7.3.622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, S. S. (1997). Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 561–571. doi: 10.1023/A:1024831908377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, S. S. (2006). Beyond fantasy and nightmare: A portrait of the jury. Buffalo Law Review, 54, 717–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. Handbook of Affective Sciences, 572–595.
   Google Scholar
• Feigenson, N., & Park, J. (2006). Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: A research review. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 143–161. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9026-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, N. J. (2000). Commonsense justice and jury instructions: Instructive and reciprocating connections. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 591–628. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.6.3.591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, N. J., Hurabiell, M. L., & Hughes, K. C. (1993). Right to die, euthanasia, and community sentiment: Crossing the public/private boundary. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 487–506. doi: 10.1007/BF01045070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georges, L. C., Wiener, R. L., & Keller, S. R. (2013). The angry juror: Sentencing decisions in first degree murder. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 156–166. doi: 10.1002/acp.2880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert v. State, 487 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Giner-Sorolla, R., Chaiken, S., & Lutz, S. (2002). Validity beliefs and ideology can influence legal case judgments differently. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 507–526. doi: 10.1023/A:1020251921659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 623 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Greene Sterling, T. (2011, April 22). Lawrence Egbert: Suicide doctor’s lucky break. The Daily Beast. Retrieved from http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/04/22/lawerence-egbert-suicide-doctor-acquitted.html
   Google Scholar
• Haegerich, T. M., & Bottoms, B. L. (2000). Empathy and jurors’ decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 421–448. doi: 10.1023/A:1005592213294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haegerich, T. M., Salerno, J. M., & Bottoms, B. L. (2013). Are the effects of juvenile offender stereotypes maximized or minimized by jury deliberation? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(1), 81–97. doi:10.1037/a0027808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, H. (2012, September 19). Doug Darrell acquitted of marijuana charges through jury nullification in New Hampshire. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/17/doug-darrell-marijuana-jury-nullification_n_1890824.html
   Google Scholar
• Hill, E. L., & Pfeifer, J. E. (1992). Nullification instructions and juror guilt ratings: An examination of modern racism. Contemporary Social Psychology, 16, 6–10. doi: 206.107.43.21/1
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, I. A. (1985). The effect of jury nullification instructions on verdicts and jury functioning in criminal trials. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 25–36. doi: 10.1007/BF01044287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, I. A. (1988). Jury nullification: The impact of judicial instructions, arguments, and challenges on jury decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 439–453. doi: 10.1007/BF01044627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, I. A., Kerr, N. L., Park, E. S., & Gockel, C. (2006). Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: Emotional bias and juror nullification. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 163–181. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9028-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, I. A., & Willging, T. E. (1991). Changing views of jury power: The nullification debate, 1787–1988. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 165–182. doi: 10.1007/BF01044616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. (1999, April 14). Kevorkian sentenced to 10 to 25 years in prison. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/14/us/kevorkian-sentenced-to-10-to-25-years-in-prison.html
   Google Scholar
• Kalven, H., Jr., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Rigby, S., & Castillo, S. R. (1991). The accuracy-confidence correlation in eyewitness testimony: Limits and extensions of the retrospective self-awareness effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 698–707. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.5.698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, D. A., McCabe, J. G., & Lieberman, J. D. (2012). Dangerously misunderstood: Representative jurors' reactions to expert testimony on future dangerousness in a sexually violent predator trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 18–49. doi: 10.1037/a0024550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecci, L. B., & Myers, B. (2009). Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 619–634. doi: 10.1080/10683160802477757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leipold, A. D. (1996). Rethinking jury nullification. Virginia Law Review, 82, 253–324. doi: 10.2307/1073635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger’s influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 115–137. doi: 10.1002/bdm.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, J. D. (2011). The utility of scientific jury selection still murky after 30 years. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 48–52. doi: 10.1177/0963721410396628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCoun, R. J., & Kerr, N. L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 21–33. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauro, R., Sato, K., & Tucker, J. (1992). The role of appraisal in human emotions: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 301–317. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, C., White, K., & Newth, S. (2003). Mood acknowledgment and correction for the mood-congruency bias in social judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 483–491. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00025-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Pfeifer, J. (2003). Jury nullification: The influence of judicial instruction on the relationship between attitudes and juridic decision-making. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 243–254. doi: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2503_07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michigan v. Kevorkian, 601 N.W. 2nd 99 (1999). Retrieved from Lexis Nexis Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, M. G., & Millar, K. U. (1996). The effects of direct and indirect experience on affective and cognitive responses and the attitude–behavior relation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 561–579. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1996.0025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125–135. doi: 10.1037/h0027568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulton, B. E., Hill, T. D., & Burdette, A. (2006). Religion and trends in euthanasia attitudes among US adults, 1977–2004. Sociological Forum, 21, 249–272. doi: 10.1007/s11206-006-9015-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler, J. (2005). Flouting the law. Texas Law Review, 83, 1399–1441. Retrieved from https://www.law.northwestern.edu/faculty/fulltime/nadler/floutingthelaw_nadler.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for State Courts. (2015). Jury Nullification in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Oregon, and New York. Retrieved from http://gaveltogavel.us/2015/07/02/jury-nullification-in-new-hampshire-massachusetts-oregon-and-new-york/
   Google Scholar
• Niedermeier, K. E., Horowitz, I. A., & Kerr, N. L. (1999). Informing jurors of their nullification power: A route to a just verdict or judicial chaos? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 331–351. doi: 10.1023/A:1022360632283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, K. M., Patry, M. W., & Penrod, S. D. (2004). Exploring the effects of attitudes toward the death penalty on capital sentencing verdicts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10, 443–470. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.10.4.443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. K., Hall, D. L., Cameron, C. D., & Bishara, A. J. (2010). A process model of affect misattribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1397–1408. doi: 10.1177/0146167210383440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242–258. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302, 109 S. Ct. 2934, 106 L. Ed. 2d 256 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• People v. Cleaves, 229 California 367 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quill v. Vacco, 80 F.3d 716 (2d Cir. 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Rendell, J. A., Huss, M. T., & Jensen, M. L. (2010). Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 411–425. doi: 10.1002/bsl.913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, B. (2000). Assisted suicide, depression, and the right to die. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 467–488. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.6.2.467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, A. M. (2006). Verdicts of conscience: Nullification and the modern jury trial. Columbia Law Review, 106, 959–993. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4099472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rurup, M. L., Buiting, H. M., Pasman, H. R., van der Maas, P. J., van der Heide, A., & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. (2008). The reporting rate of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: A study of the trends. Medical Care, 46, 1198–1202. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817d69e8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salerno, J. M., Najdowski, C. J., Stevenson, M. C., Wiley, T. R. A., Bottoms, B. L., VacaJr., R., & Pimentel, P. S. (2010). Psychological mechanisms underlying support for juvenile sex offender registry laws: Prototypes, moral outrage, and perceived threat. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 58–83. doi: 10.1002/bsl.921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salerno, J. M., & Peter-Hagene, L. C. (2013). The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgements. Psychological Science, 24, 2069–2078. doi: 10.1177/0956797613486988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandys, M., & Dillehay, R. C. (1995). First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials. Law and Human Behavior, 19(2), 175–195. doi:10.1007/BF01499324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheflin, A., & Van Dyke, J. (1980). Jury nullification: The contours of a controversy. Law and Contemporary Problems, 43, 51–115. doi: 10.2307/1191378
   Google Scholar
• Schuller, R. A., & Rzepa, S. (2002). Expert testimony pertaining to battered woman syndrome: Its impact on jurors’ decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 655–673. doi: 10.1023/A:1020933618221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmler, C., & Brewer, N. (2002). Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20, 423–436. doi: 10.1002/bsl.502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. I., & Skolnick, P. (1995). Effects of prohibitive and informative judicial instructions on jury decisionmaking. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 23(4), 319–325. doi:10.2224/sbp.1995.23.4.319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. J., & Lytle, B. (2009). Limits on legitimacy: Moral and religious convictions as constraints on deference to authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 567–578. doi: 10.1037/a0015998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. J., & Mullen, E. (2004). Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: An integrative approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 743–756. doi: 10.1177/0146167204263968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparf v. United States, 156 U.S. 5 (1895).
   Google Scholar
• Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973–988. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States v. Dougherty, 473 E 2d 1113 (D.C. Circuit Court, 1972).
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Heicklen, 858 F. Supp. 2d 256 (S. D. New York, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. (1970). The jury as a political institution. Catholic Law Review, 16, 224–270. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ cathl16&div=27&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• Vescio, T. K., Sechrist, G. B., & Paolucci, M. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455–472. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidmar, N. J., & Schuller, R. A. (1989). Juries and expert evidence: Social framework testimony. Law and Contemporary Problems, 5, 133–176. doi: 10.2307/1191909
   Google Scholar
• Vitez, M. (2014, February 13). Judge rejects assisted-suicide case against Philly nurse Barbara Mancini. The Inquirer. Retrieved from http://articles.philly.com/2014-02-13/news/47308318_1_hospice-nurse-barbara-mancini-fred-fanelli
   Google Scholar
• Volokh, E. (2016, March, 14). Jury nullification instructions coming to New Hampshire? The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/03/14/jury-nullification-instructions-coming-to-new-hampshire/?utm_term=.5bd1f5efc51d
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, J., Clair, J., & Ritchey, F. (2005). A scale to assess attitudes toward euthanasia. Omega Journal of Death and Dying, 51, 229–237. doi: 10.2190/FGHE-YXHX-QJEA-MTM0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiser, B. (2012, April 19). Jury statute not violated by protester, judge rules. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/20/nyregion/indictment-against-julian-heicklen-jury-nullification-advocate-is-dismissed.html
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, R. L., Bornstein, B. H., & Voss, A. (2006). Emotion and the law: A framework for inquiry. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 231–248. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9025-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, T. R. A., & Bottoms, B. L. (2009). Effects of defendant sexual orientation on jurors’ perceptions of child sexual abuse. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 46–60. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9131-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S. Ct. 1770, 20 L. Ed. 2d 776 (1968). doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9131-2
   Google Scholar