3,452
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Initial evidence for the assimilation hypothesis

Pages 1010-1020 | Received 29 Mar 2017, Accepted 28 Jul 2017, Published online: 04 Sep 2017

References

  • Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290. doi: 10.1037/h0055756
  • Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations: The need for cognitive closure. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2, 43–63. doi: 10.1002/jip.19
  • Aspinwall, L. G., Brown, T. R., & Tabery, J. (2012). The double-edged sword: Does biomechanism increase or decrease judges’ sentencing of psychopaths? Science, 337, 846–849. doi: 10.1126/science.1219569
  • Douglas, K. S., Lyon, D. R., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (1997). The impact of graphic photographic evidence on mock jurors’ decision in a murder trial: Probative of prejudicial? Law and Human Behavior, 21, 485–501. doi: 10.1023/A:1024823706560
  • Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Tang, D. T. W. (2010). Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory and Cognition, 38, 1087–1100. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.8.1087
  • Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2005). The last word in court: A hidden disadvantage for the defense. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 705–722. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-8380-7
  • Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts’ judicial decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 188–200. doi: 10.1177/0146167205282152
  • Fenton, N., Neil, M., & Lagnado, D. A. (2013). A general structure for legal arguments about evidence using Bayesian networks. Cognitive Science, 37, 61–102. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12004
  • Findley, K. A., & Scott, M. S. (2006). The multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases. Wisconsin Law Review, 2, 291–397.
  • Greenspan, R., & Scurich, N. (2016). The interdependence of perceived confession voluntariness and case evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 650–659. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000200
  • Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215–228. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215
  • Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
  • Kassin, S. M., & Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the ‘harmless error’ rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 27–46. doi: 10.1023/A:1024814009769
  • Kukucka, J., & Kassin, S. M. (2014). Do confessions taint perceptions of handwriting evidence? An empirical test of the forensic confirmation bias. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 256–270. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000066
  • Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
  • Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Test of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189–206. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
  • Rassin, E., & Israëls, H. (2014). False confessions in the lab: A review. Erasmus Law Review, 7, 219–224.
  • Saks, M. J., & Koehler, J. J. (2005). The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science, 309, 892–895. doi: 10.1126/science.1111565
  • Schmittat, S. M., & Englich, B. (2016). If you judge, investigate! responsibility reduces confirmatory information processing in legal experts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22, 386–400. doi: 10.1037/law0000097
  • Simon, D. (2004). A third view of the black box: Cognitive coherence in legal decision making. The University of Chicago Law Review, 71, 511–586.
  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Viewing CSI and the threshold of guilt: Managing truth and justice in reality and fiction. The Yale Law Journal, 115, 1050–1085. doi: 10.2307/20455645