Criminal defense and judicial sentencing in China's death penalty cases

References

• Anderson, J. M., & Heaton, P. (2012). How much difference does the lawyers make? The effect of defense counsel on murder case outcome. The Yale Law Journal, 122(1), 154–216. Retrieved from https://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/1105_8izvsf8m.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldus, D. C., Woodworth, G. G., Grosso, C. M., & Christ, A. M. (2002). Arbitrariness and discrimination in the administration of the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis of the nebraska experience (1973–1999). Nebraska Law Review, 81, 486–756. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol81/iss2/3/
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J. C., & Shumsky, R. (1997). A comparison of retained and appointed counsel in cases of capital murder. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 525–538. doi: 10.1023/A:1024827807469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerregaard, B., Smith, M. D., Fogel, S. J., & Palacios, W. R. (2010). Alcohol and drug mitigation in capital murder trials: Implications for sentencing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 27, 517–537. doi: 10.1080/07418820903051623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, K. (2009). Current situation and improvement for appointed counsels in death penalty cases. Legal Science, 11, 140–149. Retrieved from http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/FXZZ200911021.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, G. (2009). Trial theory and practice in drug crime. Beijing: People’s Court Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, W., & Zha, G. (2006). Empirical studies on relationship between criminals and victims for murders. Journal of Chinese People’s Republic Security University, 2, 70–78. Retrieved from http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/GADX200602010.htm
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, L. K., Smith, M. D., Bjerregaard, B., & Fogel, S. J. (2014). Examining the impact of proximate culpability mitigation in capital punishment sentencing recommendations: The influence of mental health mitigators. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 698–715. doi: 10.1007/s12103-014-9255-5
   Google Scholar
• Gitelman, M. (1971). Relative performance of appointed and retained counsel in Arkansas felony cases: An empirical study. Arkansas Law Review, 24, 442–452. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/arklr24&div=52&g_sent=1&collection=journals.
   Google Scholar
• Guangdong Higher Court. (2003). ‘Opinions on the standard of quantity and sentencing for drug cases.’ effective on June 17 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Han, H., & Liu, C. (2011). On the effective assistance of the counsel system in death penalty cases. Law Science Magazine, 10, 74–77. doi: 10.16092/j.cnki.1001-618x.2011.10.025
   Google Scholar
• Hood, R. (2009). Abolition of the death penalty: China in world perspective. City University of Hong Kong Law Review, 1(1), 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.cityu.edu.hk/slw/CityULR/abstract/001-1-01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, N. (2013). Death penalty reforms in China: Lessons from wrongful convictions? Tsinghua China Law Review, 5, 127–150. Retrieved from http://www.tsinghuachinalawreview.org/articles/PDF/TCLR_0502_JIANG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. L., Blume, J. H., Eisenberg, T., Hans, V. P., & Wells, M. T. (2012). The delaware death penalty: An empirical study. Iowa Law Review, 97, 1925–1964. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1904&context=facpub.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. T., & Zimring, F. E. (2009). The next frontier: National development, political change, and the death penalty in Asia. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, E. (2010). The Li zhuang case: Examining the challenge facing criminal defense lawyers in China. Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 24, 129–169. Retrieved from https://cjal.columbia.edu/article/li-zhuang-case-a-coincidental-incident-or-a-deliberate-event/.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Longmire, D., & Lu, H. (2016). Death penalty disposition in China: What matters? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0306624X16642426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, B., & He, N. (2014). Criminal defense in Chinese courtrooms: An empirical inquiry. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 1230–1252. doi:10.1177/0306624X13493077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, B., & Lu, H. (2016). The death penalty in China: Policy, practice and reform. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. (2013). Capital punishment with a two-year suspension: China’s gateway to fewer executions. Crime and Criminal Justice International, 20, 1–38. Retrieved from http://www.ntpu.edu.tw/gradcrim/temp/P_020130517232141.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H., & Kelly, B. (2008). Courts and sentencing research on contemporary in China. Crime, Law and Social Change, 50, 229–243. doi: 10.1007/s10611-008-9132-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., & Miethe, T. D. (2002). Legal representation and criminal processing in China. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 267–280. doi: 10.1093/bjc/42.2.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., & Miethe, T. D. (2007). China’s death penalty: History, law, and contemporary practices. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H., & Zhang, L. (2005). Death penalty in China: The law and the practice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 367–376. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, K., & Tang, G. (2014). Defense strategies of death penalty on drug cases. Chinese Lawyer, 5, 35–37. Retrieved from http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/ZGLS201405014.htm
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, N., Vertino, T., & Lu, H. (2014). The death penalty in China. In L. Cao, I. Y. Sun, & B. Hebenton (Eds.), The routledge handbook of Chinese criminology (pp. 130–144). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miao, M. (2013). Capital punishment in China: A populist instrument of social governance. Theoretical Criminology, 17, 233–250. doi: 10.1177/1362480613476788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, Y. (2007). Sentencing sources of the death penalty with suspension and immediate execution. Criminal Law Review, 21, 159–191. Retrieved from http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/ZHEN200811006.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Qi, J. (2007). Investigative report on death penalty issues. In W. Gao (Ed.), Social science research on issues of the death penalty in China (pp. 198–222). Beijing: Peoples’ Public Security University of China Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanghai Higher Court. (2005). ‘Shanghai court sentencing guide of drug cases’, effective on March 8 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Su, Y., & Ren, Z. (2014, October 16). Decipher death penalty review of 152 verdicts. Southern Weekly. Retrieved from http://www.infzm.com/content/104801
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court. (1987). ‘Death sentence criteria for drug selling cases’, effective on July 15 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court. (1999). ‘Minutes of criminal trial work symposium on maintaining stability in rural areas’, effective on October 27 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court. (2000a). ‘Summary of national court working conference on drug cases’, effective on April 4 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court. (2000b). ‘Interpretations on standards of conviction and sentencing issues regarding drug crimes’, effective on June 6 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court. (2010). ‘Opinion on certain issues concerning implementing the criminal justice policy of balancing leniency and severity’, effective on February 8 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court. (2015a). ‘Rules on hearing defense lawyer’ opinions in approval of death penalty cases’, effective on January 29 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court. (2015b). ‘Summary of national court working conference on drug cases’, effective on May 18 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court, & Ministry of Justice. (2008). ‘Rules on ensuring lawyers performance of their duties and quality guaranty for death penalty cases’, effective on May 21 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court, Supreme People’s Procuratorate, Ministry of Public Security, & Ministry of Justice. (2007). ‘Opinion on strictly and lawfully handling death penalty cases to ensure quality’, effective on March 9 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court, Supreme People’s Procuratorate, Ministry of Public Security, Ministry of National Security, & Ministry of Justice. (2010a). ‘Rules on Certain Issues Concerning Examination and Judgment of Evidence in Death Penalty Cases’, effective on June 13 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme People’s Court, Supreme People’s Procuratorate, Ministry of Public Security, Ministry of National Security, & Ministry of Justice. (2010b). ‘Rules on Certain Issues Concerning the Exclusion of Illegal Evidence in Criminal Cases’, effective on July 1 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Trevaskes, S. (2008). The death penalty in China today: Kill fewer, kill cautiously. Asian Survey, 48, 393–413. doi: 10.1525/as.2008.48.3.393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevaskes, S. (2013). China’s death penalty: The supreme people’s court, the suspended death sentence and the politics of penal reform. British Journal of Criminology, 53, 482–499. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azt002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., & Zhang, M. (2008). A positive analysis of standards of the death penalty of intentional homicide–founded by the theory of second sentences. Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology, 22(1), 32–37. Retrieved from http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/JLZY200801009.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong, M. (2016). The death penalty after the restoration of centralized review: An empirical study of capital sentencing. In B. Liang, & H. Lu (Eds.), Death penalty in China: Policy, practice, and reform (pp. 214–246). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. (2014). The development of China’s death penalty representation guidelines: The ABA guidelines for the appointment and performance of defense counsel in death penalty cases. Hofstra Law Review, 42, 589–608. Retrieved from http://www.hofstralawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/BB.7.Yang_.final2_.pdf.
   Google Scholar