Effect of public safety realignment variables on the perceived employability of former offenders: public perception of the role of type of custody and program participation

References

• ACLU of California. (2012, March). Public safety realignment: California at a crossroads. Retrieved from: https://www.aclunc.org/issues/criminal_justice/realignment_will_california_confront_its_incarceration_crisis.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Albright, S., & Denq, F. (1996). Employer attitudes toward hiring ex-offenders. The Prison Journal, 76, 118–137. doi: 10.1177/0032855596076002002
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, C. A., & Armstrong, G. S. (2011). Does the concentration of parolees in a community impact employer attitudes toward the hiring of ex-offenders? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. A., Naro-Ware, W., Ocker, R., Harris, R., & Allen, R. (2012). Evaluation of the current and future Los Angeles County jail population, The JFA Institute. Retrieved from: http://file.lacounty.gov/lasd/cms1_176827.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bahr, S. J., Harris, L., Fisher, J. K., & Armstrong, A. H. (2010). Successful reentry: What differentiates successful and unsuccessful parolees? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 667–692. doi: 10.1177/0306624X09342435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellotti, M. (2005). Life skills project. The Journal of Correctional Education, 56, 96–100.
   Google Scholar
• Bills, D. B. (1990). Employers’ use of job history data for making hiring decisions: A fuller specification of job assignment and status attainment. The Sociological Quarterly, 31, 23–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1990.tb00315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, L. E., Visher, C. A., & Naser, R. L. (2006). Community residents’ perceptions of prisoner reentry in selected Cleveland neighborhoods. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute. Justice Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). (2012, November 19). 2011 public safety realignment: The cornerstone of California’s solution to reduce overcrowding, costs, and recidivism. Retrieved from: http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/realignment/docs/Realignment-Fact-Sheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). (2011). Corrections: Year at a glance 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/News/docs/2011_Annual_Report_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• California Forward. (2012, May). County AB 109 plans analysis and summary. Retrieved from: https://cafwd.box.com/s/a1a46b535db1c875be0a
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, G., & Thompson, P. (2002). ‘We recruit attitude’: The selection and shaping of routine call centre labour. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 233–254. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale, A. P., Gainer, L. J., & Meltzer, A. S. (1990). Workplace basics: The essential skills employers want. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevale, A. P., Gainer, L. J., Meltzer, A. A., & Holland, S. L. (1988). Workplace basics: The skills employers want. Training and Development Journal, 42, 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cerda, J. A., Stenstrom, D. M., & Curtis, M. (2015). The role of type of offense and work qualifications on perceived employability of former offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 317–335. doi: 10.1007/s12103-014-9244-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cid, J. (2009). Is imprisonment criminogenic? A comparative study of recidivism rates between prison and suspended prison sanctions. European Journal of Criminology, 6, 459–480. doi: 10.1177/1477370809341128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fahey, J., Roberts, C., & Engel, L. (2006). Employment of ex-offenders: Employer perspectives. Boston, MA: Urban Institute Reentry Roundtable.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. (2003). Can we close the revolving door? Recidivism vs. employment of ex-offenders in the U.S. Urban Institute Reentry Roundtable.
   Google Scholar
• Giguere, R., & Dundes, L. (2002). Help wanted: A survey of employer concerns about hiring ex-convicts. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 396–408. doi: 10.1177/088740302237806
   Google Scholar
• Glaze, L. E. (2011). Correctional populations in the United States (2010). NCJ 236319 Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Graffam, J., Shinkfield, A. J., & Hardcastle, L. (2008). The perceived employability of ex-prisoners and offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 673–685. doi: 10.1177/0306624X07307783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, G. S., & Roessner, J. D. (1972). How employers screen disadvantaged job applicants. Monthly Labor Review, 95, 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Haslewood-Pocsik, I., Brown, S., & Spencer, J. (2008). A not so well-lit path: Employers’ perspectives on employing ex-offenders. The Howard Journal, 47, 18–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2008.00501.x
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, H. J. (1996). What employers want: Job prospects for less educated workers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, H. J., Raphael, S., & Stoll, M. A. (2003a). Employer demand for ex-offenders: Recent evidence from Los Angeles. New York: Urban Institute Reentry Roundtable.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, H. J., Raphael, S., & Stoll, M. A. (2003b). Employment barriers facing ex-offenders. New York: Urban Institute Reentry Roundtable.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, H. J., Raphael, S., & Stoll, M. A. (2004). How willing are employers to hire ex-offenders? Focus, 23, 40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, K. A., Forrester, S., Brown, J., Jobe, D., & McCullen, C. (2000). Analysis of recidivism rates for participants of the academic/vocation/transition education programs offered by the virginia department of correctional education. Journal of Correctional Education, 51, 256–261.
   Google Scholar
• Inmate Services Bureau. (2011, September 23). Assembly bill 109: Public safety realignment plan.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, W., & Giegold, W. C. (1976). Finding jobs for ex-offenders: A study of employers’ attitudes. American Business Law Journal, 14, 195–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1976.tb00454.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju, S., Zhang, D., & Pacha, J. (2012). Employability skills valued by employers as important for entry-level employees with and without disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 35, 29–38. doi: 10.1177/0885728811419167
   Google Scholar
• Krisberg, B., & Marchionna, S. (2006). Attitudes of US voters toward prisoner rehabilitation and reentry policies. Oakland, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
   Google Scholar
• Legislative Analyst’s Office. (2012, February 22). The 2012-2013 budget: The 2011 realignment of adult offenders – an update. Retrieved from: http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/crimjustice/2011-realignment-of-adult-offenders-022212.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, J., & Sabol, W. (2001). Prisoner reentry in perspective. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. L., & Hobler, B. (1996). Delaware’s life skills program reduces recidivism. Corrections Today, 58, 114–117.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, B., & Mobley, A. (2012). Realignment in california: Policy and research implications. Western Criminological Review, 13, 46–52.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2001). When prisoners return to communities: Political, economic, and social consequences. Federal Probation, 65, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2005). Hard time: Ex-offenders returning home after prison. Corrections Today, 67, 66–155.
   Google Scholar
• The PEW Center on The States. (2001, April). State of Recidivism: The revolving door of America’s prisons. Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/sentencing_and_corrections/State_Recidivism_Revolving_Door_America_Prisons%20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The PEW Charitable Trusts. (2008, February). One in 100: Behind bars in America 2008. Retrieved from http://www.pewstates.org/research/reports/one-in-100-85899374411
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi: 10.3758/BF03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson, J. P. (2000). What are employability skills. The Workplace, 1, 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Saylor, W. G., & Gaes, G. G. (2001). The differential effect of industries and vocational training on postrelease outcomes for ethnic and racial groups: Research note. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. (2005). Life skills project. The Journal of Correctional Education, 56, 115–123.
   Google Scholar
• Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
   Google Scholar
• Seiter, R. P., & Kadela, K. R. (2003). Prisoner reentry: What works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime and Delinquency, 49, 360–388. doi: 10.1177/0011128703049003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigler, R. T., & Lamb, D. (1995). Community-based alternatives to prison: How the public and court personnel view them. Federal Probation, 59, 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, A. L., Johnson, K. D., Travis, J., & McBride, E. C. (2004). From prison to work: The employment dimensions of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Reentry Roundtable.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, S. J., Langfitt-Reese, S., & Bond, G. R. (2012). Employer attitudes about criminal histories. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 35, 385–390. doi: 10.1037/h0094498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tews, M. J., Stafford, K., & Tracey, B. J. (2011). What matters most? The perceived importance of ability and personality for hiring decisions. Human Resources Management, 52, 94–101.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. T. (2001). Intermediate sanctions: A comparative probability and severity of recidivism. Sociological Inquiry, 71, 164–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2001.tb01107.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varghese, F. P., Hardin, E. E., & Bauer, R. L. (2009). Factors influencing the employability of latinos: The roles of ethnicity, criminal history, and qualifications. Race and Social Problems, 1, 171–181. doi: 10.1007/s12552-009-9014-2
   Google Scholar
• Varghese, F. P., Hardin, E. E., Bauer, R. L., & Morgan, R. D. (2010). Attitudes toward hiring offenders: The roles of criminal history, job qualifications, and race. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 769–782. doi: 10.1177/0306624X09344960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.095931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar