You can believe your eyes: measuring implicit recognition in a lineup with pupillometry

References

• Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2012). Cognitive load theory: New directions and challenges. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 827–832. doi: 10.1002/acp.2882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 276–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindemann, M., Brown, C., Koyas, T., & Russ, A. (2012). Individual differences in face identification postdict eyewitness accuracy. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(2), 96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitsios, P., Szabadi, E., & Bradshaw, C. M. (1996). The inhibition of the pupillary light reflex by the threat of an electric shock: A potential laboratory model of human anxiety. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 10(4), 279–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M. A., & Lang, P. J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 602–607. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, N., & Burke, A. (2002). Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 26(3), 353–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, N., & Palmer, M. A. (2010). Eyewitness identification tests. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 77–96. doi: 10.1348/135532509X414765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocher, A., & Graf, T. (2016). Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory. Psychophysiology, 53(12), 1823–1835. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Newman, C., & Burton, A. M. (2001). Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(3), 207–218. doi: 10.1037//1076-898X.7.3.207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A. M., White, D., & McNeill, A. (2010). The Glasgow face matching test. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 286–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Epps, J. (2014). Using task-induced pupil diameter and blink rate to infer cognitive load. Human–Computer Interaction, 29(4), 390–413. doi: 10.1080/07370024.2014.892428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A., & Dewhurst, S. A. (1995). Remembering, familiarity, and source monitoring. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 48(1), 125–140. doi: 10.1080/14640749508401380
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12(1), 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. C. (2004). Remember-know: A matter of confidence. Psychological Review, 111(2), 524–542. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, J., Neufeld, P., & Scheck, B. (2000). Actual innocence: Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted (1st ed.). New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goldinger, S. D., He, Y., & Papesh, M. H. (2009). Deficits in cross-race face learning: Insights from eye movements and pupillometry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(5), 1105–1122. doi: 10.1037/a0016548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldinger, S. D., & Papesh, M. H. (2012). Pupil dilation reflects the creation and retrieval of memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 90–95. doi: 10.1177/0963721412436811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. J., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M. (2000). Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 330–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaver, B., & Hutton, S. B. (2011). Keeping an eye on the truth? Pupil size changes associated with recognition memory. Memory (Hove, England), 19(4), 398–405. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.575788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Innocence Project. (2019). Retrieved June 24, 2019, from https://www.innocenceproject.org/causes/eyewitness-misidentification.
   Google Scholar
• Jainta, S., & Baccino, T. (2010). Analyzing the pupil response due to increased cognitive demand: An independent component analysis study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 77(1), 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimble, M. O., Fleming, K., Bandy, C., Kim, J., & Zambetti, A. (2010). Eye tracking and visual attention to threating stimuli in veterans of the Iraq war. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24(3), 293–299. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laeng, B., & Falkenberg, L. (2007). Women’s pupillary responses to sexually significant others during the hormonal cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 52(4), 520–530. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, C. D., Marchand, Y., Smith, S. M., & Connolly, J. F. (2007). Determining eyewitness identification accuracy using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Psychophysiology, 44(6), 894–904. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00566.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLin, O. H., MacLin, M. K., & Malpass, R. S. (2001). Race, arousal, attention, exposure and delay: An examination of factors moderating face recognition. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 134–152. doi: 10.1037//1076-8971.7.1.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour, J. K., & Flowe, H. D. (2010). Eye tracking and eyewitness memory.  Forensic Update, 101, n.p. Retrieved June 25, 2019 from https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/20322.
   Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., Siebold, A., Donk, M., & Vitu, F. (2015). Large pupils predict goal-driven eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 513–521. doi: 10.1037/a0039168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. K., & Bornstein, B. H. (Eds.). (2013). Stress, trauma, and wellbeing in the legal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199829996.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Montefinese, M., Vinson, D., & Ambrosini, E. (2018). Recognition memory and featural similarity between concepts: The pupil’s point of view. Biological Psychology, 135, 159–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G., Groeger, J. A., & Greene, C. M. (2016). Twenty years of load theory—where are we now, and where should we go next? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1316–1340. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0982-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• My Light Meter Pro. (2015). Retrieved from https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/mylightmeter-pro/id583922375?mt=8
   Google Scholar
• Otero, S. C., Weekes, B. S., & Hutton, S. B. (2011). Pupil size changes during recognition memory: Pupil size and recognition memory. Psychophysiology, 48(10), 1346–1353. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01217.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papesh, M. H., Goldinger, S. D., & Hout, M. C. (2012). Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(1), 56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partala, T., & Surakka, V. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1–2), 185–198. doi: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00017-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquado, T., Isaacowitz, D., & Wingfield, A. (2010). Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. Psychophysiology, 47(3), 560–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00947.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prehn, K., Heekeren, H. R., & van der Meer, E. (2011). Influence of affective significance on different levels of processing using pupil dilation in an analogical reasoning task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 79(2), 236–243. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, T. D., Green, L., Myerson, J., Parker, J., Ramaratnam, M., & Buckner, R. L. (2007). Dissociable but inter-related systems of cognitive control and reward during decision making: Evidence from pupillometry and event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 37(3), 1017–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, J., Brewer, N., Zweck, T., & Weber, N. (2009). The effect of retention interval on the confidence–accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 34(4), 337–347. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9192-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerland, M., & Sporer, S. L. (2009). Fast and confident: Postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(1), 46–62. doi: 10.1037/a0014560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale-Carlisle, T. M., & Mickes, L. (2016). US line-ups outperform UK line-ups. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160300. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowden, R. J., O’Farrell, K. R., Burley, D., Erichsen, J. T., Newton, N. V., & Gray, N. S. (2016). The pupil’s response to affective pictures: Role of image duration, habituation, and viewing mode. Psychophysiology, 53(8), 1217–1223. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SR Research. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.sr-research.com/products/eyelink-1000-plus/
   Google Scholar
• Steblay, N. K., Dietrich, H. L., Ryan, S. L., Raczynski, J. L., & James, K. A. (2011). Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 35(4), 262–274. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9236-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25(5), 459–473. doi: 10.1023/A:1012888715007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 29–47). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., & Mesout, J. (2009). Eyewitness identification under stress in the London dungeon. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(2), 151–161. doi: 10.1002/acp.1463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rijn, H., Dalenberg, J. R., Borst, J. P., & Sprenger, S. A. (2012). Pupil dilation co-varies with memory strength of individual traces in a delayed response paired-associate task. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e51134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VIPER. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.viper.police.uk
   Google Scholar
• Võ, M. L.-H., Jacobs, A. M., Kuchinke, L., Hofmann, M., Conrad, M., Schacht, A., & Hutzler, F. (2008). The coupling of emotion and cognition in the eye: Introducing the pupil old/new effect. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 130–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00606.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). “Good, you identified the suspect”: Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 360–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Ferguson, T. J., & Lindsay, R. C. (1981). The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of fact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(6), 688–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A. (2003). Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 277–295. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S. J., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Steblay, N. K., & Dysart, J. E. (2015). Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: An experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., Read, D. J., & Lindsay, S. D. (2016). The effect of retention interval on the eyewitness identification confidence–accuracy relationship. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(2), 192–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., & Stroud, J. N. (2002). Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: People are better with their own age. Law and Human Behavior, 26(6), 641–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., Heslenfeld, D. J., Johnsrude, I. S., Versfeld, N. J., & Kramer, S. E. (2014). The eye as a window to the listening brain: Neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load. NeuroImage, 101, 76–86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar