References
- Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 669–679. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.669
- Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 477–492. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.477
- Boskovic, I., Bogaard, G., Merckelbach, H., Vrij, A., & Hope, L. (2017). The Verifiability approach to detection of malingered physical symptoms. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(8), 717–729. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1302585
- Boskovic, I., Gallardo, C. T., Vrij, A., Hope, L., & Merckelbach, H. (2018). Verifiability on the run: An experimental study on the verifiability approach to malingered symptoms. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1483272
- Cheng, Z., Caverlee, J., Lee, K., & Sui, D. Z. (2011). Exploring Millions of Footprints in Location Sharing Services. Icwsm, 2010(Cholera), 81–88. Retrieved from https://papers3://publication/uuid/0C46BD5D-4908-4A8A-BD06-5BCB2F1DE282
- Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/141613a0 doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
- Denault, V., & Jupe, L. M. (2017). Deception detection: From police-suspect and investigative interviews to trials. In B. Baker, R. Minhas, & L. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology and law factbook (Vol. 2, pp. 22–24). Derby, UK: European Association of Psychology and Law Student Society.
- Dunbar, N. E., Jensen, M. L., Burgoon, J. K., Kelley, K. M., Harrison, K. J., Adame, B. J., & Bernard, D. R. (2013). Effects of veracity, modality, and sanctioning on credibility assessment during mediated and unmediated interviews. Communication Research, 1–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213480175
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
- Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Savitsky, K. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Article in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 332–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.332 doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.332
- Girardin, F., Calabrese, F., Fiore, F. D., Ratti, C., & Blat, J. (2008). Digital footprinting: Uncovering tourists with user-generated content. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(4), 36–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2008.71
- Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(3), 189–200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160701645181
- Hartwig, M., Anders Granhag, P., & Strömwall, L. A. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(2), 213–227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160600750264
- Harvey, A. C., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Lafferty, M., & Nahari, G. (2017). Insurance based lie detection: Enhancing the verifiability approach with a model statement component. Acta Psychologica, 174, 1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2017.01.001
- Harvey, A. C., Vrij, A., Nahari, G., & Ludwig, K. (2017). Applying the verifiability approach to insurance claims settings: Exploring the effect of the information protocol. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22(1), 47–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.2017.22.issue-1 doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12092
- Jupe, L. M., Leal, S., Vrij, A., & Nahari, G. (2017). Applying the verifiability approach in an international airport setting. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(8), 812–825. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1327584
- Jupe, L. M., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Nahari, G. (2016). The lies we live: Using the verifiability approach to detect lying about occupation. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 13(1), 1–14.
- Jupe, L. M., Vrij, A., Leal, S., & Nahari, G. (2018). Are you for real? The use of unexpected process questions within the detection of identity deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(5), 622–634. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3446
- Leal, S., Vrij, A., Vernham, Z., Dalton, G., Jupe, L., Harvey, A., & Nahari, G. (2018). Cross-cultural verbal deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 23(2), 192–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12131
- Leins, D. A., Fisher, R. P., & Ross, S. J. (2013). Exploring liars’ strategies for creating deceptive reports. Legal and Criminological Psychology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02041.x
- Lupton, D. (2012). Digital sociology: An introduction. Sydney: University of Sydney. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=_HEhBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=WTpn_9Pza9&sig=M7MVmdTOb4CLEeDl4xiDeoYWCWQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
- Marion, S. B., & Burke, T. M. (2013). False alibi corroboration: Witnesses lie for suspects who seem innocent, whether they like them or not. Law and Human Behavior, 37(2), 136–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000021
- Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2013). ‘What would you say if you were guilty?’ Suspects’ strategies during a hypothetical behavior analysis interview concerning a serious crime. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 60–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2872
- Michael, K., & Clarke, R. (2013). Location and tracking of mobile devices: Überveillance stalks the streets. Computer Law & Security Review, 29(3), 216–228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLSR.2013.03.004
- Nahari, G. (2018). Reality monitoring in the forensic context: Digging deeper into the speech of liars. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.04.003
- Nahari, G., Leal, S., Vrij, A., Warmelink, L., & Vernham, Z. (2014). Did somebody see it? Applying the verifiability approach to insurance claim interviews. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 11(3), 237–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1417
- Nahari, G., & Nisin, Z. (2019). Digging further into the speech of liars: Future research prospects in verbal lie detection. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 56. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYT.2019.00056
- Nahari, G., & Vrij, A. (2014). Can I borrow your alibi? The applicability of the verifiability approach to the case of an alibi witness. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.005
- Nahari, G., & Vrij, A. (2015). Can someone fabricate verifiable details when planning in advance? It all depends on the crime scenario. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(10), 987–999. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1077248
- Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2014a). Exploiting liars’ verbal strategies by examining the verifiability of details. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19(2), 227–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02069.x
- Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2014b). The verifiability approach: Countermeasures facilitate its ability to discriminate between truths and lies. Applied Cognitive Psychology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2974
- Savitsky, K., & Gilovich, T. (2003). The illusion of transparency and the alleviation of speech anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 618–625. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00056-8
- Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: Wiley.
- Vrij, A., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2014). Eliciting reliable information in investigative interviews. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 129–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214548592
- Vrij, A., Meissner, C. A., Fisher, R. P., Kassin, S. M., Morgan, A., & Kleinman, S. M. (2017). Psychological perspectives on interrogation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 66(June 2015), 635–648. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00258
- Vrij, A., & Nahari, G. (2019). The verifiability approach. In J. J. Dickinson, N. S. Compo, R. N. Carol, B. L. Schwartz, & M. R. McCauley (Eds.), Evidence-based investigative interviewing: Applying cognitive principles (pp. 116–133). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=quOLDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Evidence-based+Investigative+Interviewing:+Applying+Cognitive+Principles+verifiability+approach&ots=5NpzoXzict&sig=gagwkbcjcwOjfwSTXBd20Jz1kR8#v=onepage&q=Evidence-based Investi
- Vrij, A., Nahari, G., Isitt, R., & Leal, S. (2016). Using the verifiability lie detection approach in an insurance claim setting. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 13(3), 183–197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1458