The role of prior punishment in preventive detention decisions

References

• Banerjee, A., & Chaudhury, S. (2010). Statistics without tears: Populations and samples. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 19(1), 60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartels, D. M. (2008). Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making. Cognition, 108(2), 381–417. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2009). Moral disagreement and procedural justice: Moral mandates as constraints to voice effects. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(1), 40–49. doi: 10.1080/00049530802607647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojczenko, M. N., & Sivasubramaniam, D. (2016). A psychological perspective on preventive detention decisions. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, R. M., & Noble, A. M. (1978). Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1424–1430. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. (1999). Public attitudes toward the treatment of sex offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4(2), 239–252. doi: 10.1348/135532599167879
   Google Scholar
• Caprariello, P. A., Cuddy, A. J., & Fiske, S. T. (2009). Social structure shapes cultural stereotypes and emotions: A causal test of the stereotype content model. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(2), 147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish?: Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 284–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M., Monahan, J., & Evans, A. (2007). The function of punishment in the “civil” commitment of sexually violent predators. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25(4), 437–448. doi: 10.1002/bsl.761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirumbolo, A., Areni, A., & Sensales, G. (2004). Need for cognitive closure and politics: Voting, political attitudes and attributional style. International Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 245–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choma, B. L., Hafer, C. L., Dywan, J., Segalowitz, S. J., & Busseri, M. A. (2012). Political liberalism and political conservatism: Functionally independent? Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 431–436. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. W., & Wink, K. (2012). The relationship between pollitical ideology and punishment: What do jury panel members say? Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 8(2), 130–146.
   Google Scholar
• Clow, K. A., & Leach, A. M. (2015). After innocence: Perceptions of individuals who have been wrongfully convicted. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20(1), 147–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, P. A., & Klumpp, T. (2009). Crime, punishment, and prejudice. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1), 73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douard, J. (2008). Sex offender as scapegoat: The monstrous other within. New York Law School Law Review, 53, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1999). Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(2), 86–107. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0302_1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson, K., & Ireland, C. (2006). Attitudes towards sex offenders and the influence of offence type: A comparison of staff working in a forensic setting and students. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 8(2), 10–19. doi: 10.1108/14636646200600009
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), 108–119. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., Soothill, K., & Dittrich, R. (2001). A new approach for ranking ‘serious’ offences. The use of paired-comparisons methodology. British Journal of Criminology, 41(4), 726–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, M. M., & Jackson, J. (2013). Retribution as revenge and retribution as just deserts. Social Justice Research, 26(1), 61–80. doi: 10.1007/s11211-012-0174-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L. (1978). Judges’ role orientations, attitudes, and decisions: An interactive model. American Political Science Review, 72(03), 911–924.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A. C. (1998). Constitutional challenges to civil commitment laws: An uphill battle for sexual predators after Kansas v. Hendricks. Catholic University Law Review, 47(3), 1145–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, G. J., & Weiner, B. (2000). Remorse, confession, group identity, and expectancies about repeating a transgression. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(4), 291–300. doi: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2204_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. H., Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Rage and reason: The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(56), 781–795.
   Google Scholar
• Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. M. (2011). Political ideology and reactions to crime victims: Preferences for restorative and punitive responses. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8(4), 830–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromet, D. M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2014). Back into the fold: The influence of offender amends and victim forgiveness on peer reintegration. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(3), 411–441. doi: 10.5840/beq20147814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromet, D. M., Okimoto, T. G., Wenzel, M., & Darley, J. M. (2012). A victim-centered approach to justice? Victim satisfaction effects on third-party punishments. Law and Human Behavior, 36(5), 375–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition & Emotion, 9(1), 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, D., Mullen, P., & McSherry, B. (2015). Advice on the legislative and governance models under the Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Supervision) Act 2009 (Vic). Melbourne; Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, L., Blumenthal, E., Douglas, A., & Weinblatt, T. (1999). A deservingness approach to respect as a relationally based fairness judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1279–1292. doi: 10.1177/0146167299258009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogue, T. E. (1993). Attitudes toward prisoners and sexual offenders. In N. C. C. G. Stephenson (Ed.), DCLP Occasional papers: Sexual offenders (pp. 27–32). Leicester: British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Jehle, A., Miller, M. K., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2009). The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors’ judgments of offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 33(5), 393–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kansas v Hendricks (U.S.), 117 S. Ct 2072. (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Keil, T. J., & Vito, G. F. (1991). Fear of crime and attitudes toward capital punishment: A structural equations model. Justice Quarterly, 8(4), 447–464.
   Google Scholar
• Kernsmith, P. D., Craun, S. W., & Foster, J. (2009). Public attitudes toward sexual offenders and sex offender registration. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18(3), 290–301. doi: 10.1080/10538710902901663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyzer, P. (2009). The “preventive detention” of serious sex offenders: Further consideration of the international human rights dimensions. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16(2), 262–270. doi: 10.1080/13218710802471750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinke, C. L., Wallis, R., & Stalder, K. (1992). Evaluation of a rapist as a function of expressed intent and remorse. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132(4), 525–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krehbiel, P. J., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Procedural justice, outcome favorability and emotion. Social Justice Research, 13(4), 339–360.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, M. J. (2003). The justice motive: Where social psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 388–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLin, M. K., & Herrera, V. (2006). The criminal stereotype. North American Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 197–208.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus-Newhall, A., Blake, L. P., & Baumann, J. (2002). Perceptions of hate crime perpetrators and victims as influenced by race, political orientation, and peer group. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(1), 108–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCorkle, R. C. (1993). Research note: Punish and rehabilitate? Public Attitudes Toward Six Common Crimes. NCCD News, 39(2), 240–252.
   Google Scholar
• McSherry, B. (2014a). Managing fear: The law and ethics of preventive detention and risk assesment. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McSherry, B. (2014b). Throwing away the key: The ethics of risk assessment for preventive detention schemes: RG Myers memorial lecture 2013. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(5), 779–790. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2014.893551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSherry, B., & Keyzer, P. (2009). Sex offenders and preventive detention: Politics, policy and practice. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milburn, M. A., Niwa, M., & Patterson, M. D. (2014). Authoritarianism, anger, and hostile attribution bias: A test of affect displacement. Political Psychology, 35(2), 225–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, C., & Sosis, R. H. (1973). A simulated jury study: Characteristics of the defendant and the jurors. The Journal of Social Psychology, 90(2), 221–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipes, R. B., & Alessi, M. (1999). Remorse and a previously punished offense in assignment of punishment and estimated likelihood of a repeated offense. Psychological Reports, 85(1), 246–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proeve, M. J., & Howells, K. (2006). Effects of remorse and shame and criminal justice experience on judgements about a sex offender. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(2), 145–161. doi: 10.1080/10683160512331316271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radley, L. (2001). Attitudes towards sex offenders. Forensic Update, 66, 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Supervision) Act 2009 (Vic).
   Google Scholar
• Shackley, M., Weiner, C., Day, A., & Willis, G. M. (2014). Assessment of public attitudes towards sex offenders in an Australian population. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(6), 553–572. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2013.793772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivasubramaniam, D., & Heuer, L. (2012). Procedural justice evaluations in interrogations. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research (pp. 79–102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., & Houston, D. A. (2001). When due process is of no consequence: Moral mandates and presumed defendant guilt or innocence. Social Justice Research, 14(3), 305–326. doi: 10.1023/A:1014372008257
   Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., & Mullen, E. (2002). The dark side of moral conviction. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2(1), 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., Winquist, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2003). Are outcome fairness and outcome favorability distinguishable psychological constructs? A meta-analytic review. Social Justice Research, 16(4), 309–341. doi: 10.1023/A:1026336131206
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., & Nolan, M. (2016). Post-sentence continued detention of high-risk terrorist offenders in Australia. Criminal Law Journal, 40(3), 163–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R. (2004). Experiences and attitudes of registered female sex offenders. Federal Probation, 68(3), 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C., & Triandis, L. M. (1960). Race, social class, religion, and nationality as determinants of social distance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61(1), 110–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valliant, P. M., Furac, C. J., & Antonowicz, D. H. (1994). Attitudes toward sex offenders by female undergraduate university students enrolled in a psychology program. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 22(2), 105–110. doi: 10.2224/sbp.1994.22.2.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, A., Dijksterhuis, A., & Vermeulen, D. (1999). Judgement and memory of a criminal act: The effects of stereotypes and cognitive load. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2–3), 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 786–794. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.84.5.786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, F. P., McShane, M. D., & Akers, R. L. (2000). Worry about victimization: An alternative and reliable measure for fear of crime. Western Criminology Review, 2(2), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Zakrisson, I. (2005). Construction of a short version of the right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 863–872. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar