318
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Does procedural fairness matter for drug abusers to stop illicit drug use? Testing the applicability of the process-based model in a Chinese context

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 507-526 | Received 06 Jun 2019, Accepted 24 Oct 2019, Published online: 03 Dec 2019

References

  • Akinlabi, O. M. (2017). Young people, procedural justice and police legitimacy in Nigeria. Policing and Society, 27(4), 419–438. doi: 10.1080/10439463.2015.1077836
  • Augustyn, M. B. (2015). The (ir) relevance of procedural justice in the pathways to crime. Law and Human Behavior, 39(4), 388–401. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000122
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  • Boateng, F. D. (2018). Institutional trust and performance: A study of the police in Ghana. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 51(2), 164–182. doi: 10.1177/0004865817712335
  • Bouffard, L. A., & Piquero, N. L. (2008). Defiance theory and life course explanations of persistent offending. Crime & Delinquency, 56(2), 227–252. doi:10.1177/0011128707311642.
  • Cherney, A., & Murphy, K. (2013). Policing terrorism with procedural justice: The role of police legitimacy and law legitimacy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 46(3), 403–421. doi: 10.1177/0004865813485072
  • Cheurprakobkit, S., & Bartsch, R. A. (2001). Police performance: A model for assessing citizens’ satisfaction and the importance of police attributes. Police Quarterly, 4(4), 449–468. doi: 10.1177/109861101129197941
  • China National Narcotic Control Committee. (2015, June 24). 2014 nian zhongguo dupin xingshi baogao [China drug crime report in 2014]. Retrieved from http://www.nncc626.com/2015-06/24/c_127945747_2.htm
  • China News Service. (2015, April 2). Dupin Zheng Xiang Nongcun Shentou, Nongcun Xidu Renyuan Yifanyangxi [Illicit drugs is increasingly used in rural areas, and rural drug users sustain their drug abuse by selling illicit drugs]. Retrieved from http://www.chinanews.com/sh/2015/04-02/7177745.shtml
  • Davies, S. G., Meliala, A., & Buttle, J. (2016). Gangnam style versus eye of the tiger: People, police and procedural justice in Indonesia. Policing and Society, 26(4), 453–474. doi: 10.1080/10439463.2014.949712
  • Fitzgerald, M., Hough, M., Joseph, I., & Quershi, T. (2002). Policing for London. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
  • Gau, J. M. (2011). The convergent and discriminant validity of procedural justice and police legitimacy: An empirical test of core theoretical propositions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(6), 489–498. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.09.004
  • Gau, J. M., Corsaro, N., Stewart, E. A., & Brunson, R.K. (2012). Examining macro-level impacts on procedural justice and police legitimacy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(4), 333–343. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.05.002.
  • Heinz, A. M., & Kerstetter, W. A. (1979). Pretrial settlement conference: Evaluation of a reform in plea bargaining. Law and Society Review, 13, 349–366. doi: 10.2307/3053258
  • Hinds, L., & Murphy, K. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 27–42. doi:10.1375/acri.40.1.27.
  • Hough, M., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Procedural justice, trust, and institutional legitimacy. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(3), 203–210. doi: 10.1093/police/paq027
  • Houlden, P. (1980). The impact of procedural modifications on evaluations of plea bargaining. Law and Society Review, 15, 267–292. doi: 10.2307/3053605
  • Jackson, J., Asif, M., Bradford, B., & Zakria Zakar, M. (2014). Corruption and police legitimacy in Lahore, Pakistan. British Journal of Criminology, 54(6), 1067–1088. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azu069
  • Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2009). Crime, policing and social order: On the expressive nature of public confidence in policing. The British Journal of Sociology, 60(3), 493–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01253.x
  • Kaiser, K., & Reisig, M. D. (2019). Legal socialization and self-reported criminal offending: The role of procedural justice and legal orientations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(1), 135–154. doi: 10.1007/s1094
  • Kim, Y. S., Ra, K. H., & McLean, K. (2019). The generalizability of police legitimacy: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and speeding intention of South Korean drivers. Asian Journal of Criminology, 14(1), 41–59. doi: 10.1007/s11417-018-9278-9
  • Kitzmann, K. M., & Emery, R. E. (1993). Procedural justice and parents’ satisfaction in a field study of child custody dispute resolution. Law and Human Behavior, 17(5), 553–567. doi: 10.1007/BF01045073
  • Knight, J., Shi, L., & Song, L. (2006). The rural-urban divide and the evolution of political economy in China. In J. K. Boyce, S. Cullenberg, P. K. Pattanaik, & R. Pollin (Eds.), Human development in the era of globalization: Essays in honor of Keith B. Griffin (pp. 44–63). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Kochel, T. R., Parks, R., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2013). Examining police effectiveness as a precursor to legitimacy and cooperation with police. Justice Quarterly, 30(5), 895–925. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2011.633544
  • Lai, Y. L., & Zhao, J. S. (2010). The impact of race/ethnicity, neighborhood context, and police/citizen interaction on residents’attitudes toward the police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 685–692. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.042
  • Liu, S., & Liu, J. (2018). Police legitimacy and compliance with the law among Chinese youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(11), 3536–3561. doi: 10.1177/0306624X17740559
  • Liu, L., Wang, H., Chui, W. H., & Cao, L. (2018). Chinese drug users’ abstinence intentions: The role of perceived social support. Journal of Drug Issues, 48(4), 519–535. doi: 10.1177/0022042618779379
  • Madon, N. S., Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2016). Promoting community collaboration in counterterrorism: Do social identities and perceptions of legitimacy mediate reactions to procedural justice policing? British Journal of Criminology, 57(5), 1144–1164. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azw053
  • Mazerolle, L., Antrobus, E., Bennett, S., & Tyler, T. R. (2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 51(1), 33–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00289.x
  • Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Antrobus, E., & Eggins, E. (2012). Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of police: Main findings from the Queensland community engagement Trial (QCET). Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(4), 343–367. doi: 10.1007/s11292-012-9160-1
  • Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(3), 245–274. doi: 10.1007/s11292-013-9175-2
  • Mikula, G., Petri, B., & Tanzer, N. (1990). What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 133–149. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420200205
  • Murphy, K. (2005). Regulating more effectively: The relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy, and tax non-compliance. Journal of law and Society, 32(4), 562–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2005.00338.x
  • Murphy, K., Mazerolle, L., & Bennett, S. (2014). Promoting trust in police: Findings from a randomised experimental field trial of procedural justice policing. Policing and Society, 24(4), 405–424. doi: 10.1080/10439463.2013.862246
  • Murphy, K., Tyler, T. R., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law? Regulation & Governance, 3(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01043.x
  • Nix, J., Wolfe, S. E., Rojek, J., & Kaminski, R. J. (2015). Trust in the police: The influence of procedural justice and perceived collective efficacy. Crime & Delinquency, 61(4), 610–640. doi: 10.1177/0011128714530548
  • Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Brame, R., & Sherman, L. W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter-the effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31(1), 163–204. doi: 10.2307/3054098
  • Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. G. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(8), 1005–1028. doi: 10.1177/0093854807301275
  • Reisig, M. D., & Lloyd, C. (2009). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and helping the police fight crime: Results from a survey of Jamaican adolescents. Police Quarterly, 12(1), 42–62. doi: 10.1177/1098611108327311
  • Ren, L., Cao, L., Lovrich, N., & Gaffney, M. (2005). Linking confidence in the police with the performance of the police: Community policing can make a difference. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(1), 55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.10.003
  • Shapiro, D. L., & Brett, J. M. (1993). Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1167–1177. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1167
  • Sun, I. Y., Wu, Y., Hu, R., & Farmer, A. K. (2017). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and public cooperation with police: Does Western wisdom hold in China? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(4), 454–478. doi: 10.1177/0022427816638705
  • Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–548. doi: 10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
  • Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Tankebe, J. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter? Criminology, 47(4), 1265–1293. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00175.x.
  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Tsushima, M., & Hamai, K. (2015). Public cooperation with the police in Japan: Testing the legitimacy model. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(2), 212–228. doi: 10.1177/1043986214568836
  • Tyler, T. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Tyler, T. R. (2000). Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 117–125. doi: 10.1080/002075900399411
  • Tyler, T. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84–99. doi: 10.1177/0002716203262627
  • Tyler, T. R. (2005). Policing in black and white: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8(3), 322–342. doi: 10.1177/1098611104271105
  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Restorative justice and procedural justice: Dealing with rule breaking. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 307–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00452.x
  • Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2005). Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1143–1158. doi: 10.5465/amj.2005.19573114
  • Tyler, T. R., & Boeckmann, R. J. (1997). The three Strikes and You Are out, but Why-The Psychology of public support for Punishing rule Breakers. Law & Society Review., 31, 237. doi: 10.2307/3053926
  • Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Tyler, T. R., & Jackson, J. (2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 78–95. doi: 10.1037/a0034514
  • Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X
  • Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (2001). Procedural justice. In J. Sanders, & V. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in Law (pp. 65–92). New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Tyler, T. R., Sherman, L., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., & Woods, D. (2007). Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: The engagement of offenders’ psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE Drinking-and-driving Experiment. Law & Society Review, 41(3), 553–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00314.x
  • Van Craen, M., & Skogan, W. G. (2015). Trust in the Belgian police: The importance of responsiveness. European Journal of Criminology, 12(2), 129–150. doi: 10.1177/1477370814543156
  • Wales, H. W., Hiday, V. A., & Ray, B. (2010). Procedural justice and the mental health court judge's role in reducing recidivism. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(4), 265–271. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.009
  • Wu, G., & Boateng, F. D. (2019). Police perception of citizens and its impact on police effectiveness and behavior: A cross-cultural comparison between China and Ghana. Policing: An International Journal, 42(5), 785–797. doi: 10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2018-0099
  • Wu, G., & Makin, D. A. (2019). The quagmire that is an unwillingness to report: Situating the code of silence within the Chinese police context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(4), 608–627. doi: 10.1177/0093854819831732

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.