References
- Abramson, J. (2018). Jury selection in the weeds: Whither the democratic shore? University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 52, 1–48.
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Erlbaum.
- Bachmann, R., & Zaheer, A. (2013). Handbook of advances in trust research. Edward Elgar.
- Baker, T., Pickett, J. T., Amin, D. M., Golden, K., Dhungana, K., Gertz, M., & Bedard, L. (2015). Shared race/ethnicity, court procedural justice, and self-regulating beliefs: A study of female offenders. Law & Society Review, 49(2), 433–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12137
- Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. Macmillan.
- Bell, M. C. (2017). Police reform and the dismantling of legal estrangement. Yale Law Journal, 126, 2054–2150.
- Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057
- Bohannon, J. (2016). Mechanical Turk upends social sciences. Science, 352, 1263–1264. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.352.6291.1263
- Bornstein, B. H., & Greene, E. (2017). The jury under fire: Myth, controversy, and reform. Oxford University Press.
- Bornstein, B. H., Miller, M. K., Nemeth, R. J., Page, G. L., & Musil, S. M. (2005). Juror reactions to jury duty: Perceptions of the system and potential stressors. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23(3), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.635
- Bornstein, B. H., & Robicheaux, T. R. (2008). Crisis, what crisis? Perception and reality in civil justice. In B. H. Bornstein, R. L. Wiener, R. Schopp, & S. Willborn (Eds.), Civil juries and civil justice: Psychological and legal perspectives (pp. 1–19). Springer.
- Bornstein, B. H., & Tomkins, A. J. (2015). Motivating cooperation and compliance with authority: The role of institutional trust. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16151-8
- Bornstein, B. H., Tomkins, A. J., Neeley, E. M., Herian, M. N., & Hamm, J. A. (2013). Reducing courts’ failure-to-appear rate by written reminders. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 19(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026293
- Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
- Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
- Cauguiran, C. (2015, May 9). 68 percent of potential Alameda County jurors fail to appear, face little punishment. CBS SFBayArea. http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2015/05/09/potential-alameda-county-jurors-fail-to-appear-jury-dodgers/
- Cobbina, J. E. (2019). Hands up, don’t shoot: Why the protests in Ferguson and Baltimore matter, and how they changed America. NYU Press.
- Crocker, C. B., & Kovera, M. B. (2011). Systematic jury selection. In R. L. Wiener & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Handbook of trial consulting (pp. 13–31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7569-0_2
- Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale’s validity. Social Justice Research, 12(2), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022091609047
- Davis v. Greer, 459 U.S. 975, 103 S.Ct. 310, 74 L.Ed.2d 289 (1982).
- Deitz, S. R., Blackwell, K. T., Daley, P. C., & Bentley, B. J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.372
- Dellapaolera, K. S., Barnes, B. A., & Bornstein, B. H. (2018). Trust in the jury system as a predictor of juror/jury decisions [ Paper presentation]. American Psychology-Law Society Meeting, Memphis, TN, United States.
- Devine, D. J. (2012). Jury decision making: The state of the science. New York University Press.
- Devine, D. J., & Caughlin, D. E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000006
- Diamond, S. S. (1993). Attitude change following jury duty. Justice System Journal, 2, 246–257.
- Farrell, A., Pennington, L., & Cronin, S. (2013). Juror perceptions of the legitimacy of legal authorities and decision making in criminal cases. Law and Social Inquiry, 38(4), 773–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01323.x
- Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.
- Gastil, J., Deess, E. P., Weiser, P. J., & Simmons, C. (2010). The jury and democracy: How jury deliberation promotes civic engagement and political participation. Oxford University Press.
- Hamm, J. A., Bornstein, B. H., & Perkins, J. (2013). Jury nullification: The myth revisited. In D. Fung (Ed.), The psychology of policy-making (pp. 49–71). Nova Science Publishers.
- Hamm, J. A., Trinkner, R., & Carr, J. D. (2017). Fair process, trust, and cooperation: Moving toward an integrated framework of police legitimacy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(9), 1183–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817710058
- Hamm, J. A., Wylie, L. E., & Brank, E. (2016). Measuring older adult confidence in the courts and law enforcement. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(3), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403415623034
- Hans, V. P. (2013). Jury jokes and legal culture. DePaul Law Review, 62, 391–413.
- Hans, V. P., Fukurai, H., Ivkovic, S. K., & Park, J. (2017). Global juries: A plan for research. In M. B. Kovera (Ed.), The psychology of juries (pp. 131–157). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000026-007
- Hans, V. P., & Lofquist, W. S. (1992). Jurors’ judgments of business liability in tort cases: Implications for the litigation explosion debate. Law & Society Review, 26(1), 85–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053837
- Horowitz, I. A., Kerr, N. L., Park, E. S., & Gockel, C. (2006). Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: Emotional bias and juror nullification. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9028-x
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
- Jackson, J. (2015). On the dual motivational force of legitimate authority. In B. H. Bornstein & A. J. Tomkins (Eds.), Motivating cooperation and compliance with authority: The role of institutional trust (pp. 145–166). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16151-8_7
- Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Kuha, J., Stares, S., Widdop, S., Fitzgerald, R., Yordanova, M., & Galev, T. (2011). Developing European indicators of trust in justice. European Journal of Criminology, 8(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811411458
- Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1983). The construction and validation of a Juror Bias Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 17(4), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(83)90070-3
- Kirk, D., & Matsuda, M. (2011). Legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and the ecology of arrest. Criminology, 49(2), 443–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00226.x
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
- Kramer, R. M. (2006). Organizational trust: Progress and promise in theory and research. In R. M. Kramer (Ed.), Organizational trust: A reader (pp. 1–17). Oxford University Press.
- Kravitz, D. A., Cutler, B. L., & Brock, P. (1993). Reliability and validity of the original and revised legal attitudes questionnaire. Law and Human Behavior, 17(6), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044688
- Lecci, L., & Myers, B. (2008). Individual differences in attitudes relevant to juror decision making: Development and validation of the Pretrial Juror Attitude Questionnaire (PJAQ). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(8), 2010–2038. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00378.x
- Loeb, P. (2017, January 24). New committee aims to increase juror participation. CBS Philly. http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2017/01/24/new-committee-aims-to-increase-juror-participation/
- MacCoun, R. J. (2006). Media reporting of jury verdicts: Is the tail (of the distribution) wagging the dog? DePaul University Law Review, 55, 539–562.
- MacCoun, R. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The basis of citizens’ perceptions of the criminal jury: Procedural fairness, accuracy, and efficiency. Law and Human Behavior, 12(3), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044389
- Matthews, R., Hancock, L., & Briggs, D. (2004). Jurors’ perceptions, understanding, confidence and satisfaction in the jury system: A study in six courts. UK Home Office.
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
- McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011). Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 23–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2011.552424
- Miller, M. K., Blumenthal, J. A., & Chamberlain, J. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of community sentiment. Springer.
- Miller, M. K., & Bornstein, B. H. (2013). The experience of jurors: Reducing stress and enhancing satisfaction. In M. K. Miller & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Stress, trauma, and wellbeing in the legal system (pp. 247–267). Oxford University Press.
- Musick, M. A., Rose, M. R., Dury, S., & Rose, R. P. (2015). Much obliged: Volunteering, normative activities, and willingness to serve on juries. Law & Social Inquiry, 40(2), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12114
- National Center for State Courts. (2007). State-of-the-states survey of jury improvement efforts.
- Necka, E. A., Cacioppo, S., Norman, G. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2016). Measuring the prevalence of problematic respondent behaviors among MTurk, campus, and community participants. PloS One, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157732
- Pirson, M., & Malhotra, D. (2011). Foundations of organizational trust: What matters to different stakeholders? Organization Science, 22(4), 1087–1104. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0581
- PytlikZillig, L. M., Hamm, J. A., Shockley, E., Herian, M. N., Neal, T. M. S., Kimbrough, C., Tomkins, A. J., & Bornstein, B. H. (2016). The dimensionality of trust-relevant constructs in four institutional domains: Results from confirmatory factor analyses. Journal of Trust Research, 6(2), 111–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2016.1151359
- Pytlikzillig, L. M., Kimbrough, C. D., Shockley, E., Neal, T. M. S., Herian, M. N., Hamm, J. A., Bornstein, B. H., & Tomkins, A. J. (2017). A longitudinal and experimental study of the impact of knowledge on the bases of institutional trust. Plos One, 12(4), e0175387. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175387
- Rose, M. R., Diamond, S. S., & Musick, M. A. (2012). Selected to serve: An analysis of lifetime jury participation. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01246.x
- Rose, M. R., Ellison, C., & Diamond, S. S. (2008). Preferences for juries over judges across racial and ethnic groups. Social Science Quarterly, 89(2), 372–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00537.x
- Rottman, D. B. (1998). On public trust and confidence: Does experience with courts promote or diminish it? Court Review, 35, 14–22.
- Rottman, D. B. (2015). Who trusts the trial courts, to what extent, and why? In B. H. Bornstein & A. J. Tomkins (Eds.), Motivating cooperation and compliance with authority: The role of institutional trust (pp. 117–144). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16151-8_6
- Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb00997.x
- Salerno, J. M., & McCauley, M. R. (2009). Mock jurors’ judgments about opposing scientific experts: Do cross-examination, deliberation and need for cognition matter? American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 27, 1–24.
- Shapiro, D. N., Chandler, J., & Mueller, P. A. (2013). Using Mechanical Turk to study clinical populations. Clinical Psychological Science, 1(2), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702612469015
- Silagy v. Peters, 905 F.2d 986 (7th Cir. 1990).
- State v. Daniels, 446 S.E.2d 298, 337 N.C. 243 (1994).
- Trescher, S. A., Miller, M. K., Pfeifer, J., Bornstein, B. H., & Kaplan, T. (2019). Jury system trustworthiness: A comparison of Australian and U.S. samples [Manuscript submitted for review].
- Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Carter, N. T. (2014). Declines in trust in others and confidence in institutions among American adults and late adolescents, 1972–2012. Psychological Science, 25(10), 1914–1923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614545133
- Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
- Tyler, T. R., Braga, A., Fagan, J., Meares, T., Sampson, R., & Winship, C. (2007). Legitimacy and criminal justice: International perspectives. Russell Sage Foundation.
- Tyler, T. R., Goff, P. A., & MacCoun, R. J. (2015). The impact of psychological science on policing in the United States: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and effective law enforcement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(3), 75–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615617791
- Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. Russell Sage Foundation.
- U.S. v. Tsarnaev, 53 F.Supp.3d 443 (2014).
- Wainwright v. Witt, 470 U.S. 1039 (1985).
- West, M. P., Wood, E. F., Miller, M. K., & Bornstein, B. H. (2020). How jurors’ cognitive processing and defendants’ immigrant status and ethnicity relate to decisions in capital trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09411-4.
- Wolfe, S. E., & Nix, J. (2016). The alleged “Ferguson Effect” and police willingness to engage in community partnership. Law and Human Behavior, 40(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000164
- Wrightsman, L. S., Batson, A. L., & Edkins, V. A. (2004). Measures of legal attitudes. Wadsworth/Thomson.
- Yelderman, L. A., Miller, M. K., & Peoples, C. D. (2016). Capital-izing jurors: How death qualification relates to jury composition, jurors’ perceptions, and trial outcomes. In B. H. Bornstein & M. K. Miller (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (pp. 27–54, Vol. 2). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43083-6_2