References
- Aamodt, M. G., & Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar?: A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. The Forensic Examiner, 15(1), 6–11.
- Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27
- Amado, B. G., Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Vilariño, M. (2016). Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.01.002
- Baker, A., ten Brinke, L., & Porter, S. (2013). Will get fooled again: Emotionally intelligent people are easily duped by high-stakes deceivers. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18(2), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02054.x
- Bet, R., Brossat, É, Ducamp, C., Graziano, C., & Michael, G. A. (2015). Sexe, mensonge et personnalité: Les paroles et le regard des machiavéliques, des psychopathes et des narcissiques que vous côtoyez. Psychologie Française, 60(3), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2014.12.003
- Bet, R., Duran, G., & Michael, G. A. (submitted). French translation and validation of the Dirty Dozen Scale, a concise measure of the Dark Triad: Machiavellianism, psychopathy and narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences.
- Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
- Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.477
- Caso, L., Gnisci, A., Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2005). Processes underlying deception: An empirical analysis of truth and lies when manipulating the stakes. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2(3), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.32
- Crombag, H. F. M., Wagenaar, W. A., & Koppen, P. J. V. (1996). Crashing memories and the problem of ‘source monitoring’. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199604)10:2<95::AID-ACP366>3.0.CO;2-#
- D’Ambrosio, F., Olivier, M., Didon, D., & Besche, C. (2009). The basic empathy scale: A French validation of a measure of empathy in youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.020
- Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.20
- DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 979–995. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.5.1037
- DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
- Dror, I. E., & Hampikian, G. (2011). Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation. Science & Justice, 51(4), 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2011.08.004
- Dror, I. E., Péron, A. E., Hind, S.-L., & Charlton, D. (2005). When emotions get the better of us: The effect of contextual top-down processing on matching fingerprints. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(6), 799–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1130
- Dukala, K., Sporer, S. L., & Polczyk, R. (2019). Detecting deception: Does the cognitive interview impair discrimination with CBCA criteria in elderly witnesses? Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1511789
- Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (1988). Discovering functionally independent mental processes: The principle of reversed association. Psychological Review, 95(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.1.91
- Duran, G., Cécillon, F.-X., Sansorgné, T., & Michael, G. A. (2019). Cold-blooded women can detect lies with greater accuracy than other women. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 30(3), 510–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2018.1560488
- Duran, G., Michael, G. A., Duchêne, A., & Tapiero, I. (revision submitted). ‘Why am I so credulous?’ ‘That’s your fault ! You misperceived emotions’.
- Duran, G., Tapiero, I., & Michael, G. A. (2018). Resting heart rate: A physiological predicator of lie detection ability. Physiology & Behavior, 186, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.01.002
- Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The mode model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Éd.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75–109). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60318-4
- Fiedler, K., & Walka, I. (1993). Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20(2), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00321.x
- Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107
- Granhag, P. A., Vrij, A., & Verschuere, B. (2015). Detecting deception: Current challenges and cognitive approaches. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Hartwig, M., Anders Granhag, P., & Strömwall, L. A. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160600750264
- Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F. (2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023589
- Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(4), 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.117.4.377
- Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
- Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67
- Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1998). False memories and confabulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(4), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01152-8
- Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010
- Jonason, P. K., Lyons, M., Bethell, E. J., & Ross, R. (2013). Different routes to limited empathy in the sexes: Examining the links between the Dark Triad and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 572–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.009
- Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
- Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
- Kealy, K. L. K., Kuiper, N. A., & Klein, D. N. (2006). Characteristics associated with real and made-up events: The effects of event valence, event elaboration, and individual differences. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 38(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/cjbs2006005
- Leal, S., Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2010). Detecting true and false opinions: The Devil’s Advocate approach as a lie detection aid. Acta Psychologica, 134(3), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.005
- Levine, T. R. (2014). Truth-Default Theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14535916
- Lyons, M., Healy, N., & Bruno, D. (2013). It takes one to know one: Relationship between lie detection and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(6), 676–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.05.018
- Malone, B. E., & DePaulo, B. M. (2001). Measuring sensitivity to deception. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity. Theory and measurement (pp. 103–124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Osborne, N. K. P., Taylor, M. C., & Zajac, R. (2016). Exploring the role of contextual information in bloodstain pattern analysis: A qualitative approach. Forensic Science International, 260, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.12.039
- Ost, J., Vrij, A., Costall, A., & Bull, R. (2002). Crashing memories and reality monitoring: Distinguishing between perceptions, imaginations and ‘false memories’. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.779
- Parker, A. D., & Brown, J. (2000). Detection of deception: Statement validity analysis as a means of determining truthfulness or falsity of rape allegations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5(2), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532500168119
- Peace, K. A., & Porter, S. (2011). Remembrance of lies past: A comparison of the features and consistency of truthful and fabricated trauma narratives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1708
- Peace, K. A., Porter, S., & Almon, D. F. (2012). Sidetracked by emotion: Observers’ ability to discriminate genuine and fabricated sexual assault allegations: Credibility and sexual trauma. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(2), 322–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02013.x
- Peace, K. A., & Sinclair, S. M. (2012). Cold-blooded lie catchers? An investigation of psychopathy, emotional processing, and deception detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532510X524789
- Pérez-Mata, N., & Diges, M. (2007). False recollections and the congruence of suggested information. Memory (Hove, England), 15(7), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701647258
- Porter, S., & Brinke, L. (2010). The truth about lies: What works in detecting high-stakes deception? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X433151
- Porter, S., Peace, K. A., Douglas, R. L., & Doucette, N. L. (2012). Recovered memory evidence in the courtroom: Facts and fallacies. In Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony: Based on the original work by Jay Ziskin (6th ed., pp. 668–684). https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195174113.003.0030
- Semmler, C., & Brewer, N. (2002). Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.502
- Stephens, M. (2015). ISIS: Inside the Army of Terror. The RUSI Journal, 160(2), 94–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2015.1031982
- Street, C. N. (2015). ALIED: Humans as adaptive lie detectors. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(4), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.06.002
- Street, C. N. H., & Kingstone, A. (2017). Aligning Spinoza with Descartes: An informed Cartesian account of the truth bias. British Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12210
- Street, C. N. H., & Masip, J. (2015). The source of the truth bias: Heuristic processing? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(3), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12204
- Street, C. N. H., & Richardson, D. C. (2015). Lies, Damn Lies, and expectations : How base rates inform lie-truth judgments: Base rate beliefs in lie detection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(1), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3085
- Strömwall, L. A., Granhag, P. A., & Landström, S. (2007). Children’s prepared and unprepared lies: Can adults see through their strategies? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1288
- ten Brinke, L., Vohs, K. D., & Carney, D. R. (2016). Can ordinary people detect deception after all? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.012
- Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Éd.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 289–338). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60010-6
- Toris, C., & DePaulo, B. M. (1984). Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5), 1063–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1063
- Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- Wai, M., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2012). The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(7), 794–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.008
- Wang, G., Chen, H., & Atabakhsh, H. (2004). Automatically detecting deceptive criminal identities. Communications of the ACM, 47(3), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/971617.971618
- Winke, M., Bless, H., & Biller, B. (1996). Subjective experience versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(11), 1105–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962211002
- Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1–59). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601.