References
- Amadeus Pro [Computer software]. (2017). https://www.hairersoft.com
- Amado, B. G., Arce, R., & Farina, F. (2015). Undeutsch hypothesis and Criteria Based Content Analysis: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 7, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.002.
- Amado, B. G., Arce, R., Farina, F., & Vilarino, M. (2016). Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.01.002.
- Arntzen, F. (1970). Psychologie der Zeugenaussage. Einführung in die forensische Aussagepsychologie [Psychology of eyewitness testimony. An introduction to the forensic psychology of statement analysis]. Hogrefe.
- Arntzen, F. (2011). Psychologie der Zeugenaussage. System der Glaubwürdigkeitsmerkmale [Psychology of eyewitness testimony. A system of credibility criteria] (5th ed.). Beck.
- Berman, G. L., Narby, D. J., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Effects of inconsistent eyewitness statements on mock-jurors’ evaluations of the eyewitness, perceptions of defendant culpability and verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499074
- Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
- Brewer, N., Potter, R., Fisher, R. P., Bond, N., & Luszcz, M. A. (1999). Beliefs and data on the relationship between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 297–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199908)13:4<297::Aid-acp578>3.0.Co;2-s doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199908)13:4<297::AID-ACP578>3.0.CO;2-S
- DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
- Fisher, R. P., Brewer, N., & Mitchell, G. (2009). The relation between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony: Legal versus cognitive explanations. In R. Bull, T. Valentine, & T. Williamson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions (pp. 121–136). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470747599.ch8
- Gongola, J., Scurich, N., & Quas, J. A. (2017). Detecting deception in children: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000211
- Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (1999). Repeated interrogations: Stretching the deception detection paradigm. Expert Evidence, 7, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008993326434
- Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2000). Deception detection: Examining the consistency heuristic. In C. M. Breur, M. M. Kommer, J. F. Nijboer, & J. M. Reintjes (Eds.), New trends in criminal investigation and evidence. (Vol II, pp. 309–321). Intersentia.
- Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2001). Deception detection: Interrogators’ and observers’ decoding of consecutive statements. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 135, 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980109603723
- Harvey, A. C., Vrij, A., Hope, L., Leal, S., & Mann, S. (2017). A stability bias effect among deceivers. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000258
- Hudson, C. A., Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., & Hope, L. (2019). The devil is in the detail: Deception and consistency over repeated interviews. Psychology, Crime & Law, https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1574790
- Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2002). Suspects, lies, and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stake liars. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015332606792
- Oberlader, V. A., Naefgen, C., Koppehele-Gossel, J., Quinten, L., Banse, R., & Schmidt, A. F. (2016). Validity of content-based techniques to distinguish true and fabricated statements: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb000019327149290 doi: 10.1037/lhb0000193
- Potter, R., & Brewer, N. (1999). Perceptions of witness behaviour-accuracy relationships held by police, lawyers and mock-jurors. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 6, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719909524952
- Steller, M., & Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria-based statement analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217–245). Springer.
- Strömwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2003). How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160308138
- Undeutsch, U. (1984). Courtroom evaluation of eyewitness testimony. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1984.tb01416.x
- Volbert, R., & Banse, R. (2014). Deception detection: How can psychological research assist legal practice? European Psychologist, 19, 159–161. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000209
- Volbert, R., & Steller, M. (2014). Is this testimony truthful, fabricated, or based on false memory? Credibility assessment 25 years after Steller and Köhnken (1989). European Psychologist, 19, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000200.
- Vredeveldt, A., van Koppen, P. J., & Granhag, P. A. (2014). The inconsistent suspect: A systematic review of different types of consistency in truth tellers and liars. In R. Bull (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 183–207). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9642-7_10
- Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3.
- Vrij, A. (2019). Deception and truth detection when analyzing nonverbal and verbal cues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3457
- Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. (2012). Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: Inducing the reverse order technique naturally. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 579–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.515987
- Vrij, A., Mann, S. A., Fisher, R. P., Leal, S., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9103-y
- Walczyk, J. J., Griffith, D. A., Yates, R., Visconte, S. R., Simoneaux, B., & Harris, L. L. (2012). Lie detection by inducing cognitive load: Eye movements and other cues to the false answers of ‘witnesses’ to crimes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 887–909. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812437014
- Walczyk, J. J., Mahoney, K. T., Doverspike, D., & Griffith-Ross, D. A. (2009). Cognitive lie detection: Response time and consistency of answers as cues to deception. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9090-8