References
- Benton, T. R., Ross, D. F., Bradshaw, E., Thomas, W. N., & Bradshaw, G. S. (2006). Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: comparing jurors, judges and law enforcement to eyewitness experts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(1), 115–129. http://doi.org/10.1002/ doi: 10.1002/acp.1171
- Brigham, J. C., & WolfsKeil, M. P. (1983). Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitnes identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 7(4), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044736
- Charman, S. D., & Wells, G. L. (2007). Eyewitness lineups: Is the appearance-change instruction a good idea? Law and Human Behavior, 31(1), 3–22. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9006-3
- Clarke, C., Milne, B., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing suspects of crime: The impact of PEACE training, supervision and the presence of a legal advisor. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1002/jip.144
- Clifford, B. R., & George, R. (1996). A field evaluation of training in three methods of witness/victim investigative interviewing. Psychology, Crime & Law, 2(3), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169608409780
- Dando, C. J., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2008). The cognitive interview: Inexperienced police officers’ perceptions of their witness/victim interviewing practices. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532506x162498
- Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1986). How we think – A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Basil Blackwell.
- Dror, I. E. (2018). Biases in Forensic Experts. Science, 360(6386), 243–243. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8443
- FPT Heads of Prosecutions Committee Working Group. (2004). Report on the prevention of miscarriages of justice. Department of Justice Canada.
- Fraser, I., Waite, K., & Bond-Fraser, L. (2013). Canadian police officers’ knowledge of the fallibility of eyewitness testimony. International Journal of Liberal Arts Social Sciences, 1(3), 108–118.
- Garrett, B. (2011). Convicting the innocent. Harvard University Press.
- Gorenstein, G. W., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1980). Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a later identification by an eyewitness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(5), 616–622. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.5.616
- Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Hartwig, M. (2005). Eyewitness testimony: Tracing the beliefs of Swedish legal professionals. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23(5), 709–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.670
- Griffiths, L., & Milne, B. (2006). Will it end in tiers?: Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In T. Williamson (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation (pp. 167–189). Willan Publishing.
- Innocence Project. (2019). DNA Exonerations in the United States. https://www.innocenceproject.org/dna-exonerations-in-the-united-states/
- Jiang, L., & Luo, D. (2016). Legal professionals’ knowledge of eyewitness testimony in China: A cross-sectional survey. PloS One, 11(2), e0148116. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148116
- Kassin, S. M., Tubb, V. A., Hosch, H. M., & Memon, A. (2001). On the "general acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 56(5), 405–416. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.5.405
- Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers’ perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138(3), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549809600384
- Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(11-12), 1201–1231. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
- Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., & Mitchell, S. (2002). Is ongoing feedback necessary to maintain the quality of investigative interviews with allegedly abused children? Applied Developmental Science, 6(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0601_04
- Loftus, E. F. (2018). Eyewitness science and the legal system. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-030850
- Memon, A., Holley, A., Milne, R., Koehnken, G., & Bull, R. (1994). Towards understanding the effects of interviewer training in evaluating the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8(7), 641-659. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350080704
- National Police Agency. (2020). Gender Statistics in the Police Force. https://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/ct?xItem=81295&ctNode=12873&mp=1
- National Research Council. (2014). Identifying the culprit: Assessing eyewitness identification. National Academies Press.
- Penrod, S. (2003). Eyewitness identification evidence: How well are witnesses and police performing? Criminal Justice Magazine, 18, 54. http://www.abanet.org/crimjust/cjmag/
- Police Executive Research Forum. (2013). A National Survey of Eyewitness Identification Procedures in Law Enforcement Agencies. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/242617.pdf
- Price, H. L., & Roberts, K. P. (2011). The effects of an intensive training and feedback program on police and social workers’ investigative interviews of children. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 43(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022541
- Smalarz, L., Kornell, N., Vaughn, K. E., & Palmer, M. A. (2019). Identification Performance from multiple lineups: Should eyewitnesses Who Pick fillers Be Burned? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8 (2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.03.001
- Steblay, N. K., Dysart, J. E., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25(5), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012888715007
- Steblay, N. K., Dysart, J. E., & Wells, G. L. (2011). Seventy-two tests of the sequential lineup superiority effect: A meta-analysis and policy discussion. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(1), 99–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021650
- Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence [TWGfEE]. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement (Report No.NCJ178240). United States Department of Justice, Offices of Justice Programs. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/178240.pdf
- Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence [TWGfEE]. (2003). Eyewitness evidence: A trainer’s manual for law enforcement (Report No. NCJ 188678). United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. http://www.ncjrs.gov/nij/eyewitness/188678.pdf
- Walsh, D. W., & Milne, R. (2008). Keeping the PEACE? A study of investigative interviewing practices in the public sector. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(1), 39–57. http://doi.org/10.1348/135532506X157179
- Wells, W., Campbell, B., Li, Y., & Swindle, S. (2016). The characteristics and results of eyewitness identification procedures conducted during robbery investigations in Houston, TX. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39(4), 601–619. https://doi.org/doi:10.1108/PIJPSM-10-2015-0124
- Wells, G. L., Memon, A., & Penrod, S. D. (2006). Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(2), 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.x
- Wells, G. L., & Quigley-McBride, A. (2016). Applying eyewitness identification research to the legal system: A glance at where we have been and where we could go. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(3), 290–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.07.007
- Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22(6), 603–647. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025750605807
- Winterdyk, J. (1988). Canadian police officers and eyewitness evidence: A time for reform. Canadian Police College Journal, 12, 175–191.
- Wise, R. A., Dauphinais, K. A., & Safer, M. A. (2007). A tripartite solution to eyewitness error. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97, 807–872.
- Wise, R. A., Pawlenko, N. B., Safer, M. A., & Meyer, D. (2009). What US prosecutors and defence attorneys know and believe about eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1266–1281. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1530
- Wise, R. A., & Safer, M. A. (2004). What US judges know and believe about eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(4), 427–443. http://doi.org/10.1002/ doi: 10.1002/acp.993
- Wise, R. A., Safer, M. A., & Maro, C. M. (2011). What US law enforcement officers know and believe about eyewitness factors, eyewitness interviews and identification procedures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1717
- Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., Dunn, J. C., Clark, S. E., & Wells, W. (2016). Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(2), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516814112
- Wogalter, M. S., Malpass, R. S., & McQuiston, D. E. (2004). A nationalsurvey of US police on preparation and conduct of identification lineups. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160410001641873
- Yarmey, A. D., & Jones, H. P. T. (1983). Is the psychology of eyewitness identification a matter of common sense? In S. Lloyd-Bostock, & B. R. Cliffords (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence (pp. 13–40). Wiley.
- Zarkadi, T., Wade, K. A., & Stewart, N. (2009). Creating fair lineups for suspects with distinctive features. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1448–1453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02463.x