References
- Brun, W., & Teigen, K. H. (1988). Verbal probabilities: Ambiguous, context-dependent, or both? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41(3), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(88)90036-2
- Cash, D. K., & Lane, S. M. (2017). Context influences I\interpretation of eyewitness confidence statements. Law and Human Behaviour, 41(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000216
- Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062972
- Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064273
- Devenport, J. L., Stinson, V., Cutler, B. L., & Kravitz, D. A. (2002). How effective are the cross-examination and expert testimony safeguards? Jurors’ perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1042–1054. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1042
- Dobolyi, D. G., & Dodson, C. S. (2018). Actual vs. perceived eyewitness accuracy and confidence and the featural justification effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(4), 543–563. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000182
- Dodson, C. S., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). Misinterpreting eyewitness expressions of confidence: The featural justification effect. Law and Human Behavior, 39(3), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000120
- Dodson, C. S., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2017). Judging guilt and accuracy: Highly confident eyewitnesses are discounted when they provide featural justifications. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(5), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1284220
- Feezel, J. D. (1974). A qualified certainty: Verbal probability in arguments. Communications Monographs, 41(4), 348–356.
- Foley, J. P. (1959). The expression of certainty. The American Journal of Psychology, 72(4), 614–615. https://doi.org/10.2307/1419512
- Grabman, J. H., & Dodson, C. S. (2019). Prior knowledge influences interpretations of eyewitness confidence statements: ‘The witness picked the suspect, they must be 100% sure'. Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(1), 50–68. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2018.1497167
- Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
- Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social metacognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_6
- Meissner, C. A., Tredoux, C. G., Parker, J. F., & MacLin, O. H. (2005). Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: A dual-process signal detection theory analysis. Memory & Cognition, 33(5), 783–792. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193074
- Modjadidi, K., & Kovera, M. B. (2018). Viewing videotaped identification procedure increases juror sensitivity to single-blind photo-array administration. Law and Human Behavior, 42(3), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000288
- Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 (1972).
- Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). The story model forjuror decision making. In R. Hastie (Ed.), Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making (pp. 192–222). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752896.010
- Qualtrics. (2015). [Computer software].
- Seale-Carlisle, T. M., Colloff, M. F., Flowe, H. D., Wells, W., Wixted, J. T., & Mickes, L. (2019). Confidence and response time as indicators of eyewitness identification accuracy in the lab and in the real world. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(4), 420–428. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.09.003
- Slane, C. R., & Dodson, C. S. (2019). Two eyewitnesses are more persuasive than one except when they remember a suspect's feature. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 60–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.12.002
- Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). “Good, you identified the suspect”: feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience.. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.360
- Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18(1), 10–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616686966