References
- Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718
- Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A. (2007a). Hot cognition in investigative judgments: The differential influence of anger and sadness. Law and Human Behavior, 31(6), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9075-3
- Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A. (2007b). Motivational bias in criminal investigators’ judgments of witness reliability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 561–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00175.x
- Ask, K., Rebelius, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2008). The ‘elasticity’ of criminal evidence: A moderator of investigator bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 12445–11259. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1432
- Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
- Bettencourt, B., Charlton, K., Dorr, N., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 520–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.520
- Bieber, P. (2012). Measuring the impact of cognitive bias in fire investigation. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fire Investigation, Science and Technology. Available from http://www.thearsonproject.org/Docs/Cognative_Bias_ARP.pdf
- Brown, W. A. (1998). The placebo effect. Scientific American, 278(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0198-90
- Cooper, G. S., & Meterko, V. (2019). Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review. Forensic Science International, 297, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016
- Ditto, P. H., & Boardman, A. F. (1995). Perceived accuracy of favorable and unfavorable psychological feedback. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16(1), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.1995.9646106 doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1601&2_9
- Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568
- Ditto, P. H., Scepansky, J. A., Munro, G. D., Apanovitch, A. M., & Lockhart, L. K. (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.53
- Dror, I. E. (2018). Biases in forensic experts. Science, 360(6386), 243. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8443
- Dror, I. E. (2020). Cognitive and human factors in expert decision making: Six fallacies and the eight sources of bias. Analytical Chemistry.
- Dror, I. E., Charlton, D., & Peron, A. (2006). Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. Forensic Science International, 156, 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.017
- Dror, I. E., & Hampikian, G. (2011). Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation. Science & Justice, 51(4), 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2011.08.004
- Earhart, J. O. (2017). Compositional bullet lead analysis. Chapter 1. In W. J. Koen & M. Bowers (Eds.), Forensic science reform: Protecting the innocent (pp. 1–23). Elsevier Science.
- Garrett, B. L. (2011). Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Harvard University Press.
- Garrett, B. L., & Neufeld, P. J. (2009). Invalid forensic science testimony and wrongful convictions. Virginia Law Review, 95(1), 1–97. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25475240
- Giannelli, P. C. (2010). Independent crime laboratories: The problem of motivational and cognitive bias. Utah Law Review, 2, 247–256.
- Henkel, L. A., Coffman, K. A., & Dailey, E. M. (2008). A survey of people’s attitudes and beliefs about false confessions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26(5), 555–584. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.826
- Jeanguenat, A. M., Bruce Budowle, B., & Dror, I. E. (2017). Strengthening forensic DNA decision making through a better understanding of the influence of cognitive bias. Science and Justice, 57(6), 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2017.07.005
- Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
- Kukucka, J. (2018). Confirmation bias in the forensic sciences: Causes, consequences, and countermeasures. In W. J. Koen & C. M. Bowers (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of wrongful convictions: Forensic science reform (pp. 223–245). Elsevier.
- Kukucka, J., Kassin, S., Zapf, P., & Dror, I. E. (2017). Cognitive bias and blindness: A global survey of forensic science examiners. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 452–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001
- Leo, R. A., & Liu, B. (2009). What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.872
- Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
- Mindthoff, A., Evans, J. R., Perez, G., Woestehoff, S. A., Olaguez, A. P., Klemfuss, J. Z., Normile, C. J., Scherr, K. C., Carlucci, M. E., Carol, R. N., Meissner, C. A., Michael, S. W., Russano, M. B., Stocks, E. L., Vallano, J. P., & Woody, W. D. (2018). A survey of potential jurors’ perceptions of interrogations and confessions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(4), 430–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000182
- Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220202
- Murrie, D. C., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2015). Adversarial allegiance among expert witnesses. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121714
- Nakao, K., & Treas, J. (1994). Updating occupational prestige and socioeconomic scores: How the new measures measure up. Sociological Methodology, 24, 1–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/270978
- National Registry of Exonerations. (2020). Exoneration detail list. http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/detaillist.aspx
- Osborne, N. K. P., Taylor, M. C., Healey, M., & Zajac, R. (2016). Bloodstain pattern classification: Accuracy, effect of contextual information and the role of analyst characteristics. Science & Justice, 56(2), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2015.12.005
- President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2016). Forensic science in criminal courts: Ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods.
- Price, D. D., Finniss, D. G., & Benedetti, F. (2008). A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: Recent advances and current thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 565–590. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.113006.095941
- Rosenthal, R. (1994). Interpersonal expectancy effects: A 30-year perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3(6), 176–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770698
- Ross, L., Lepper, M., & Ward, A. (2010). History of social psychology: Insights, challenges, and contributions to theory and application. In Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3–50). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001001
- Saks, M. J., & Koehler, J. J. (2005). The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science, 309(5736), 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111565
- Scherr, K. C., Redlich, A. D., & Kassin, S. M. (2020). Cumulative disadvantage: A psychological framework for understanding how innocence can lead to confession, wrongful conviction, and beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619896608
- Smit, N. M., Morgan, R. M., & Lagnado, D. A. (2018). A systematic analysis of misleading evidence in unsafe rulings in England and Wales. Science & Justice, 58(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2017.09.005
- Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B. (1978). Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(2), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(78)90021-5
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
- Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6–34). Blackwell.
- Wilks, M., Kirby, J., & Nielsen, M. (2018). Children imitate antisocial in-group members. Developmental Science, 21(6), e12675. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12675
- Zapf, P., Kukucka, J., Kassin, S., & Dror, I. E. (2018). Cognitive bias in forensic mental health assessment: Evaluator beliefs about its nature and scope. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000153