References
- References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, Inc.
- *Andersen, S. M., Carlson, C. A., Carlson, M. A., & Gronlund, S. D. (2014). Individual differences predict eyewitness identification performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, 36–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.011
- *Beresford, J., & Blades, M. (2006). Children’s identification of faces from lineups: The effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1102–1113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1102
- Bergold, A. N., & Heaton, P. (2018). Does filler database size influence identification accuracy? Law and Human Behavior, 42(3), 227–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000289
- Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2006). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.12.1.11
- Brigham, J. C., & Brandt, C. C. (1992). Measuring lineup fairness: Mock-witness responses versus direct evaluations of lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 16(5), 475–489. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044619
- *Brigham, J. C., Maass, A., Larry, D. S., & Spaulding, K. (1982). Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in a field study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(4), 673–681. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.4.673
- Brigham, J. C., Meissner, C. A., & Wasserman, A. W. (1999). Applied issues in the construction and expert assessment of photo lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(S1), S73–S92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199911)13:1+<S73::AID-ACP631>3.3.CO;2-W
- Brigham, J. C., Ready, D. J., & Spier, S. A. (1990). Standards for evaluating the fairness of photograph lineups. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1102_3
- *Brigham, J. C., Verst, M. V., & Bothwell, R. K. (1986). Accuracy of children’s eyewitness identifications in a field setting. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7(4), 295–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0704_4
- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (1st ed.). Guilford Publications.
- Bruer, K. C., Fitzgerald, R. J., Therrien, N. M., & Price, H. L. (2015). Line-up member similarity influences the effectiveness of a salient rejection option for eyewitnesses. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(1), 124–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.919688
- Buckhout, R., Rabinowitz, M., Alfonso, V., Kanellis, D., & Anderson, J. (1988). Empirical assessment of lineups: Getting down to cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12(3), 323–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044388
- Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500510597283
- *Carlson, C. A., & Carlson, M. A. (2014). An evaluation of lineup presentation, weapon presence, and a distinctive feature using ROC analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(2), 45–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.03.004
- *Carlson, C. A., Dias, J. L., Weatherford, D. R., & Carlson, M. A. (2017). An investigation of the weapon focus effect and the confidence–accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.04.001
- *Carlson, C. A., Gronlund, S. D., & Clark, S. E. (2008). Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.118
- Carlson, C. A., Jones, A. R., Whittington, J. E., Lockamyeir, R. F., Clarson, M. A., & Wooten, A. R. (2019). Lineup fairness: Propitious heterogeneity and the diagnostic feature-detection hypothesis. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0172-5
- *Carlson, C. A., Young, D. F., Weatherford, D. R., Carlson, M. A., Bednarz, J. E., & Jones, A. R. (2016). The influence of perpetrator exposure time and weapon presence/timing on eyewitness confidence and accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 898–910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3275
- *Charman, S. D., & Cahill, B. S. (2012). Witnesses’ memories for lineup fillers postdicts their identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2011.08.001
- *Charman, S. D., & Quiroz, V. (2016). Blind sequential lineup administration reduces both false identifications and confidence in those false identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 40(5), 477–487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000197
- Charman, S. D., & Wells, G. L. (2007). Applied lineup theory. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Memory for people (pp. 219–254). Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
- Clark, S. E., & Davey, S. L. (2005). The target-to-foils shift in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 29(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-2418-7
- Clark, S. E., Howell, R. T., & Davey, S. L. (2008). Regularities in eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 32(3), 187–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9082-4
- Clark, S. E., & Tunnicliff, J. L. (2001). Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification experiments: Experimental control and real-world simulation. Law and Human Behavior, 25(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010753809988
- Colloff, M. F., Wade, K. A., & Strange, D. (2016). Unfair lineups make witnesses more likely to confuse innocent and guilty suspects. Psychological Science, 27(9), 1227–1239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616655789
- Corey, D., Malpass, R. S., & McQuiston, D. E. (1999). Parallelism in eyewitness and mock witness identifications. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(S1), S41–S58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199911)13:1+3.0.CO;2-A
- Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 629–637. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.629
- *Davis, J. P., Gibson, S., & Solomon, C. (2014). The positive influence of creating a holistic facial composite on video line-up identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 634–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3045
- *Davis, J. P., Maigut, A. C., Jolliffe, D., Gibson, S. J., & Solomon, C. J. (2015). Holistic facial composite creation and subsequent video line-up eyewitness identification paradigm. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 106, e53298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3791/53298
- *Davis, J. P., Thorniley, S., Gibson, S. J., & Solomon, C. J. (2016). Holistic facial composite construction and subsequent lineup identification accuracy: Comparing adults and children. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 150(1), 102–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1009867
- DeVellis, R. (2012). Scale development theory and applications. Sage Publications.
- Doob, A. N., & Kirshenbaum, H. M. (1973). The effects on arousal of frustration and aggressive films. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(73)90062-0
- *Dysart, J. E., Lawson, V. Z., & Rainey, A. (2012). Blind lineup administration as a prophylactic against the postidentification feedback effect. Law and Human Behavior, 36(4), 312–319. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093921
- Engellant, K. A., Holland, D. D., & Piper, R. T. (2016). Assessing convergent and discriminant validity of the motivation construct for the technology integration education (TIE) model. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 16, 37–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v16i1.1935
- Fitzgerald, R. J., Oriet, C., & Price, H. L. (2015). Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: A literature review and a novel methodology. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000095
- *Fitzgerald, R. J., Oriet, C., & Price, H. L. (2016). Change blindness and eyewitness identification: Effects on accuracy and confidence. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21(1), 189–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12044
- Fitzgerald, R. J., Price, H. L., Oriet, C., & Charman, S. D. (2013). The effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification decisions: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030618
- Gonzalez, R., Davis, J., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1995). Who should stand next to the suspect? Problems in the assessment of lineup fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 525–531. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.525
- *Greathouse, S. M., & Kovera, M. B. (2009). Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 33(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9136-x
- *Gronlund, S. D., Carlson, C. A., Dailey, S. B., & Goodsell, C. A. (2009). Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015082
- *Haw, R. M., Dickinson, J. J., & Meissner, C. A. (2007). The phenomenology of carryover effects between show-up and line-up identification. Memory, 15, 117–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210601171672
- *Haw, R. M., & Fisher, R. P. (2004). Effects of administrator-witness contact on eyewitness identification accuracy. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1106–1112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1106
- Hirschberg, N., Jones, L. E., & Haggerty, M. (1978). What’s in a face: Individual differences in face perception. Journal of Research in Personality, 12(4), 488–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(78)90074-0
- *Horry, R., Palmer, M. A., & Brewer, N. (2012). Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 18(4), 346–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029779
- *Hosch, H. M., & Bothwell, R. K. (1990). Arousal, description and identification accuracy of victims and bystanders. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 5(5), 481–488. https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/arousal-description-identification-accuracy/docview/1292259148/se-2?accountid=27467
- *Humphries, J. E., Holliday, R. E., & Flowe, H. D. (2012). Faces in motion: Age-related changes in eyewitness identification performance in simultaneous, sequential, and elimination video lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 149–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1808
- *Key, K. N., Cash, D. K., Neuschatz, J. S., Price, J., Wetmore, S. A., & Gronlund, S. D. (2015). Age differences (or lack thereof) in discriminability for lineups and showups. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(9), 871–889. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1054387
- *Key, K. N., Wetmore, S. A., Neuschatz, J. S., Gronlund, S. D., Cash, D. K., & Lane, S. (2017). Line-up fairness affects postdictor validity and ‘don’t know’ responses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3302
- *Köhnken, G., & Maass, A. (1988). Eyewitness testimony: False alarms on biased instructions? Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 363–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.363
- *Krafka, C., & Penrod, S. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.58
- *Lawson, V. Z., & Dysart, J. E. (2014). The showup identification procedure: An exploration of systematic biases. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02057.x
- Lee, J. (2019). Facial identification: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research [Doctoral dissertation]. CUNY Academic Works. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3422
- Lee, J., & Penrod, S. D. (2019). New signal-detection-theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 43(5), 436–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000343
- Lindsay, R. C. L., Mansour, J. K., Beaudry, J. L., Leach, A.-M., & Bertrand, M. I. (2009). Sequential lineup presentation: Patterns and policy. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 14(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/135532508X382708
- Lindsay, R. C. L., Smith, S. M., & Pryke, S. (1999). Measures of lineup fairness: Do they postdict identification accuracy? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, S93–S107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199911)13:1+<S93::AID-ACP633>3.0.CO;2-X
- Litwin, M. S. (1995). How to measure survey reliability and validity. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348957
- *Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about “weapon focus”. Law and Human Behavior, 11(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044839
- Malpass, R. S. (1981). Effective size and defendant bias in eyewitness identification lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 5(4), 299–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044945
- Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1983). Measuring the fairness of eyewitness identification lineups. In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence (pp. 81–102). Wiley & Sons.
- Malpass, R. S., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1999). Measuring lineup fairness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(S1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199911)13:1+3.0.CO;2-9
- Malpass, R. S., Tredoux, C. G., & McQuiston-Surrett, D. (2007). Lineup construction and lineup fairness. In R. Lindsay, D. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology (Vol. 2): Memory for people. (pp.155–178) Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
- Mansour, J. K., Beaudry, J. L., Kalmet, N., Bertrand, M. I., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2017). Evaluating lineup fairness: Variations across methods and measures. Law and Human Behavior, 41(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000203
- *Mansour, J. K., Lindsay, R. C. L., Brewer, N., & Munhall, K. G. (2009). Characterizing visual behaviour in a lineup task. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(7), 1012–1026. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1570
- McQuiston, D. E., & Malpass, R. S. (2002). Validity of the mockwitness paradigm: Testing the assumptions. Law and Human Behavior, 26(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016383305868
- *Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Kelley, C. M. (2001). The influence of retrieval processes in verbal overshadowing. Memory & Cognition, 29(1), 176–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195751
- Nosworthy, G. J., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1990). Does nominal lineup size matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 358–361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.358
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Penrod, S. D. (2003). Eyewitness identification evidence: How well are witnesses and police performing? Criminal Justice Magazine, Spring, 18, 36–47.
- Penrod, S. D. (2006, March). Eyewitness guessing and choosing. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, St. Petersburg, FL.
- *Pigott, M. A., Brigham, J. C., & Bothwell, R. K. (1990). Field study on the relationship between quality of eyewitnesses’ descriptions and identification accuracy. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17(2), 84–88.
- *Platz, S. J., & Hosch, H. M. (1988). Cross-racial/ethnic eyewitness identification: A field study1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(11), 972–984. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01187.x
- Post, M. W. (2016). What to do with “moderate” reliability and validity coefficients? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(7), 1051–1052. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.001
- Pozzulo, J. D., Dempsey, J. L., & Wells, K. (2010). Does lineup size matter with child witnesses. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 25(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-009-9055-x
- *Pozzulo, J. D., Reed, J., Pettalia, J., & Dempsey, J. (2016). Simultaneous, sequential, elimination, and wildcard: A comparison of lineup procedures. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 31(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9168-3
- *Quinlivan, D. S., Neuschatz, J. S., Cutler, B. L., Wells, G. L., McClung, J., & Harker, D. L. (2012). Do pre-admonition suggestions moderate the effect of unbiased lineup instructions? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/135532510X533554
- *Rhead, L. M., Rodriguez, D. N., Korobeynikov, V., Yip, J. H., & Kovera, M. B. (2015). The effects of lineup administrator influence and mortality salience on witness identification accuracy. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 15(3), 248–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2015.1041362
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
- *Smalarz, L., & Wells, G. L. (2014). Confirming feedback following a mistaken identification impairs memory for the culprit. Law and Human Behavior, 38(3), 283–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000078
- *Steblay, N. K., Dietrich, H. L., Ryan, S. L., Raczynski, J. L., & James, K. A. (2011). Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 35(4), 262–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9236-2
- *Steblay, N. K., & Phillips, J. D. (2011). The not-sure response option in sequential lineup practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 768–774. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1755
- Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. (1967).
- *Sučić, I., Tokić, D., & Ivešić, M. (2015). Field study of response accuracy and decision confidence with regard to lineup composition and lineup presentation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(8), 798–819. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1054383
- Tredoux, C. (2002). A direct measure of facial similarity and its relation to human similarity perceptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(3), 180–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.8.3.180
- Tredoux, C. (2019, May). Identification parades: Measuring their fairness, creating synthetic versions and motivations for change of format in South Africa. Invited presentation at the National VIPER© Bureau Academic Research Conference “Eyewitness Identification”, National VIPER© Bureau, Wakefield, UK.
- Tredoux, C. G. (1998). Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness. Law and Human Behavior, 22(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025746220886
- Tredoux, C. G. (1999). Statistical considerations when determining measures of lineup size and lineup bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(S1), 9–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199911)13:1+3.0.CO;2-1
- Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 43(2), 161–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749108400966
- *Vredeveldt, A., Tredoux, C. G., Kempen, K., & Nortje, A. (2015). Eye remember what happened: Eye-closure improves recall of events but not face recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3092
- Wells, G. L., Leippe, M. R., & Ostrom, T. M. (1979). Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup. Law and Human Behavior, 3(4), 285–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01039807
- Wells, G. L., & Turtle, J. W. (1986). Eyewitness identification: The importance of lineup models. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.320