Alternative stories and the decision to prosecute: an applied approach against confirmation bias in criminal prosecution

References

• Adaval, R., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1998). The role of narratives in consumer information processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 207–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0703_01
   Google Scholar
• Alderden, M. a., & Ullman, S. E. (2012). Creating a more complete and current picture: Examining police and prosecutor decision-making when processing sexual assault cases. Violence Against Women, 18(5), 525–551. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212453867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations: The need for cognitive closure. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.19
   Google Scholar
• Blandón-Gitlin, I., Sperry, K., & Leo, R. A. (2011). Jurors believe interrogation tactics are not likely to elicit false confessions: Will expert witness testimony inform them otherwise? Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160903113699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Justiz. (2017). Sicherheitsbericht 2017. Bericht über die Tätigkeit der Strafjustiz [Security Report 2017. Activity report of the criminal justice system]. https://www.justiz.gv.at/web2013/home/justiz/daten_und_fakten/berichte/ sicherheitsberichte∼2c94848525f84a630132fdbd2cc85c91.de.html
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.7.2.91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chestek, K. D. (2010). Judging by the numbers: An empirical study of the power of story. Journal of the Association of Legal Writing Directors, 7, 1–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1457947
   Google Scholar
• Clary, E. G., & Shaffer, D. R. (1980). Effects of evidence withholding and a defendant’s prior record on juridic decisions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 112(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1980.9924325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daftary-Kapur, T., Dumas, R., & Penrod, S. D. (2010). Jury decision-making biases and methods to counter them. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 133–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X465624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwinkel, E., Powell, M., & Sharman, S. J. (2015). Police and prosecutors’ perceptions of adult sexual assault evidence associated with case authorisation and conviction. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(4), 213–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9162-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwinkel, E., Powell, M., & Tidmarsh, P. (2014). Prosecutors’ perceptions of the utility of ‘relationship’ evidence in sexual abuse trials. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 47(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865813497733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., & Caughlin, D. E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, T. (1994). Differing perceptions of attorney fees in bankruptcy cases. Washington University Law Review, 72(3), 979–995.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, L., & Munro, V. E. (2009). Reacting to rape: Exploring mock jurors’ assessments of complainant credibility. British Journal of Criminology, 49(2), 202–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azn077
   Google Scholar
• Englich, B. (2006). Blind or biased? Justitia’s susceptibility to anchoring effects in the courtroom based on given numerical representations. Law and Policy, 28(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2006.00236.x
   Google Scholar
• Englich, B. (2009). Heuristic strategies and persistent biases in sentencing decisions. In M. E. Oswald, S. Bieneck, & J. Hupfeld-Heinemann (Eds.), Social psychology of punishment of crime (pp. 295–314). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2005). The last word in court—A hidden disadvantage for the defense. Law and Human Behavior, 29(6), 705–722. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-8380-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts’ judicial decision making, 188–200.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findley, K. A., & Scott, M. S. (2006). The multiple dimensions of tunnel cision in criminal cases. Wisconsin Law Review, 2, 291–397.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, T. W. (2010). The intersection of defendants’ race, gender, and age in prosecutorial decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerberding, P. (2005). Das Rechtsmittelsystem im US-amerikanischen Strafverfahren [The system of legal remedies in US-American criminal proceedings]. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, E., & Dodge, M. (1995). The influence of prior record evidence on juror decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 19(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, J., & Parker, P. (1985). White-collar crime and punishment: The class structure and legal sanctioning od securities violations. American Sociological Review, 50(3), 302–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2095541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, J. (1971). Die Reform der deutschen Hauptverhandlung nach dem Vorbild des anglo-amerikanischen Strafverfahrens [The reform of the German trial based on the model of the Anglo-American criminal proceedings]. Bonn: Ludwig Rörscheid Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hertel, F. (2010). ‘Deal’ gleich ‘Bargain’? Verständigungen im deutschen und angelsächsischen Strafverfahren [‘Deal’ equals ‘Bargain’? Communication in German and Anglo-Saxon criminal proceedings]. Zeitschrift Für Das Juristische Studium, 2, 198–208.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, E. R., & Markman, K. D. (1995). Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1069–1086. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holleran, D., Beichner, D., & Spohn, C. (2010). Examining charging agreement between police and prosecutors in rape cases. Crime & Delinquency, 56(3), 385–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128707308977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J., & Simon, D. (1999). Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidén, M., Gräns, M., & Juslin, P. (2019). From devil’s advocate to crime fighter: Confirmation bias and debiasing techniques in prosecutorial decision-making. Psychology, Crime and Law, 25(5), 494–526. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1538417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luus, C. A. L., & Wells, C. L. (1994). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co-witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 714–723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maegherman, E. F. L. (2021). Facilitating falsification in legal decision making: Problems in practice and potential solutions. Maastricht University, The House of Legal Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20210114em
   Google Scholar
• Mazzella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(15), 1315–1338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01552.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzocco, P. J., & Green, M. C. (2011). Narrative persuasion in legal settings: What’s the story? The Jury Expert, 23(3), 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. R. M., Lee, S. M., & Chen, K. K. (2002). When negative evidence increases confidence: Change in belief after hearing two sides of a dispute. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. L. (2019). Expertise fails to attenuate gendered biases in judicial decision-making. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(2), 227–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617741181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, C. J., Brown, K., & Rogers, J. (2001). Devil’s advocate versus authentic dissent: Stimulating quantity and quality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(6), 707–720. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, B. (2009). Prime suspect: An examination of factors that aggravate and counteract confirmation bias in criminal investigations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15(4), 315–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, M. E. (2009). How knowledge about the defendant’s previous convictions influences judgments of guilt. In M. E. Oswald, S. Bieneck, & J. Hupfeld-Heinemann (Eds.), Social psychology of punishment of crime (pp. 357–377). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 521–533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.14.3.521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.62.2.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). Reasoning in explanation-based decision making. Cognition, 49(1–2), 123–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90038-W
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., & Costantini, G. (2018). A practical primer to power analysis for simple experimental designs. International Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezdek, K., & O’Brien, M. (2014). Plea bargaining and appraisals of eyewitness evidence by prosecutors and defense attorneys. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(3), 222–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.770855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyszczynski, T., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1981). The effects of opening statements on mock jurors’ verdicts in a simulated criminal trial’. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11(4), 301–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1981.tb00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachlinski, J. J., Guthrie, C., & Wistrich, A. J. (2007). Heuristics and biases in bankruptcy judges. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 163(1), 167–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1628/093245607780181991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassin, E. (2010). Blindness to alternative scenarios in evidence evaluation. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassin, E. (2020). Context effect and confirmation bias in criminal fact finding. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 25, 80–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlotthauser, S., & Yundina, E. (2016). Schuld und Vorurteil: Zum Einfluss von Vorstrafen auf das Schuldurteil [Guilt and prejudice: About the influence of prior conviction on verdicts]. Recht und Psychologie, 34(1), 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, N. (1993). Strafverfahren und Strafrecht in den Vereinigten Staaten [Criminal proceedings and criminal law in the United States] (2nd ed.). C. F. Müller Juristischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schmittat, S. M., & Englich, B. (2016). If you judge, investigate! Responsibility reduces confirmatory information processing in legal experts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(4), 386–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, D., Snow, C. J., & Read, S. J. (2004). The redux of cognitive consistency theories: Evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 814–837. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2001). White juror bias: An investigation of prejudice against black defendants in the American courtroom. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 201–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistisches Bundesamt. (2017). Statistisches Jahrbuch 2019 [Statistical Yearbook 2019]. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Querschnitt/Jahrbuch/_inhalt.html
   Google Scholar
• Tenney, E. R., Cleary, H. M. D., & Spellman, B. A. (2009). Unpacking the doubt in ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’: Plausible alternative stories increase not guilty verdicts. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530802659687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tersago, P., Vanderhallen, M., Rozie, J., & McIntyre, S.-J. (2020). From suspect statement to legal decision making. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 228(3), 175–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trüg, G. (2008). Erkenntnisse aus der Untersuchung des US-amerikanischen plea bargaining-systems für den deutschen Absprachendiskurs [Insights from the US-American plea bargaining-system for the discussion about German plea-bargaining]. Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 120(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/ZSTW.2008.331
   Google Scholar
• van Laer, T., de Ruyter, K., Visconti, L. M., & Wetzels, M. (2014). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(February), 797–817. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/673383
   Google Scholar
• Velten, P. (2016). Das verhältnis von Ermittlungs- und Hauptverfahren ̶ Der lange Arm des Ermittlungsverfahrens [The relationship between investigative and main proceedings ̶ The long arm of the preliminary investigation]. In F. Herzog, R. Schlothauer, W. Wohlers, & J. Wolter (Eds.), Rechtsstaatlicher Strafprozess und Bürgerrechte. Gedächtnisschrift für Edda Weßlau (297th ed., pp. 94–411). Dunker & Humbolt.
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, D., Boduszek, D., Debowska, A., & Woodfield, R. (2018). Introduction and validation of the Juror Decision Scale (JDS): An empirical investigation of the story model. Journal of Criminal Justice, 57, 26–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 117–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissler, R. L., & Saks, M. J. (1985). On the inefficacy of limiting instructions: When jurors use prior conviction evidence to decide on guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 9(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wistrich, A. J., Guthrie, C., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2005). Can judges ignore inadmissible information? The difficulty of deliberately disregarding. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 153(4), 1251–1345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4150614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yale, R. N. (2013). Measuring narrative believability: Development and validation of the Narrative Believability Scale (NBS-12). Journal of Communication, 63(3), 578–599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar