Decision importance and Black and Hispanic jurors’ judgments of outgroup and ingroup defendants in a trial simulation

References

• Bagby, R. M., & Rector, N. A. (1992). Prejudice in a simulated legal context: A further application of social identity theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(4), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldus, D. C., Woodworth, G., Zuckerman, D., Weiner, N. A., & Broffit, B. (1998). Racial discrimination and the death penalty in the post-furman era: An empirical and legal overview with more recent findings from Philadelphia. Cornell Law Review, 83(6), 1630–1770. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol83/iss6/6/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. S., Vandello, J. A., & Brunsman, B. (1996). The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 915–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boninger, D. S., Krosnick, J. A., Berent, M. K., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1995). The causes and consequences of attitude importance. In R. E. Petty, & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 159–189). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022326807441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucolo, D. O., & Cohn, E. S. (2010). Playing the race card: Making race salient in defence opening and closing statements. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532508X400824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.7.2.91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, F., Bromley, S., & Saxe, L. (1980). Recent unobtrusive studies of black and white discrimination and prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 87(3), 546–563. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.3.546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., & Caughlin, D. E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 20(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinoza, R. K. E., & Willis-Esqueda, C. (2008). Defendant and defense attorney characteristics and their effects on juror decision making and prejudice against Mexican Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(4), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieve, P. G., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 926–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992511002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leippe, M. R. (1991). A self-image analysis of persuasion and attitude involvement. In R. C. Curtis (Ed.), The relational self: Theoretical convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology (pp. 37–63). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Leippe, M. R., Bergold, A. N., & Eisenstadt, D. (2017). Prejudice and terror management at trial: Effects of defendant race/ethnicity and mortality salience on mock-jurors’ verdict judgments. Journal of Social Psychology, 157(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1184128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leippe, M. R., & Eisenstadt, D. (1994). The generalization of dissonance reduction: Decreasing prejudice through induced compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leippe, M. R., & Elkin, R. A. (1987). When motives clash: Issue involvement and response involvement as determinants of persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292183006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minear, M., & Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 630–633. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206543
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell, T. L., Haw, R. M., Pfeifer, J. E., & Meissner, C. A. (2005). Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: A meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 29(6), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-8122-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustard, D. B. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U. S. Federal courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 285–314. https://doi.org/10.1086/320276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nietzel, M. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Kern, M. J. (1999). Juries: The current state of the empirical literature. In R. Roesch, S. D. Hart, & J. R. P. Ogloff (Eds.), Psychology and law: The state of the discipline (pp. 23–52). Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4891-1_2.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th edition, Vol. I, pp. 323-390). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pezdek, K., Avila-Mora, E., & Sperry, K. (2010). Does trial presentation medium matter in jury simulation research? Evaluating the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A. (2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00279.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, M. J., & Bradfield, A. L. (2004). Race and information processing in criminal trials: Does the defendant's race affect how the facts are evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 995–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204265741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuller, R. A., Kazoleas, V., & Kawakami, K. (2009). The impact of prejudice screening procedures on racial bias in the courtroom. Law and Human Behavior, 33(4), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9153-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2000). Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1367–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200263005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2009). ‘Race salience’ in juror decision-making: Misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(4), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, C.J., Borgida, E. and Lavine, H. (1995). The causes and consequences of personal involvement. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 191-214). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, A., Dijksterhuis, A., & Vermeulen, D. (1999). Judgement and memory of a criminal act: The effects of stereotypes and cognitive load. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2-3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<191::AID-EJSP923>3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Kerr, N. L., Fleming, M. A., & Petty, R. E. (2000). Flexible corrections of juror judgments: Implications for jury instructions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(3), 629–654. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.6.3.629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar