Guided by the rape schema: the influence of event order on how jurors evaluate the victim’s testimony in cases of rape

References

• Anderson, I. (2007). What is a typical rape? Effects of victim and participant gender in female and male rape perception. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(1), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466606X101780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, I., & Doherty, K. (2008). Accounting for rape. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2019, June 27). 4510.0 - Recorded Crime - Victims, Australia, 2018. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/4510.0
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (1973). Schema theory: An information processing model of perception and cognition. The American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1248–1266. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohner, G., Eyssel, F., Pina, A., Siebler, F., & Viki, T. (2009). Rape myth acceptance: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. In M. Horvath, & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 17–45). Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H., Golding, J. M., Neuschatz, J., Kimbrough, C., Reed, K., Magyarics, C., & Luecht, K. (2017). Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 41(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. E., & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In R. S. Wyer Jr, & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 119–160). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bryden, D. P., & Lengnick, S. (1997). Rape in the Criminal Justice system. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 87(4), 1194–1384. https://doi.org/10.2307/1144018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckles, T. (2007). Crime scene investigation, criminalistics, and the law. Thomson Delmar Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Burgin, R., & Flynn, A. (2019). Women’s behavior as implied consent: Male “reasonableness” in Australian rape law. Criminology & Criminal Justice, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895819880953
   Google Scholar
• Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, M. R., & Albin, R. S. (1981). Rape myths, rape definitions, and probability of conviction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11(3), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1981.tb00739.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., Ganellen, R. J., Froming, W. J., & Chambers, W. (1983). Modeling: An analysis in terms of category accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(5), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90019-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, N. K., & Messman-Moore, T. L. (2018). I said No: The impact of voicing Non-consent on Women’s perceptions of and responses to rape. Violence Against Women, 24(5), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217708059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, P. G., & Sharp, L. B. (2009). Automaticity and control in stereotyping and prejudice. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 61–87). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Du Mont, J., Miller, K.-L., & Myhr, T. L. (2003). The role of “real rape” and “real victim” stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9(4), 466–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801202250960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. M., Probst, D. R., Tansill, E. C., Dixon, K. J., Bennett, S., & Gidycz, C. A. (2014). In their Own words: A content-analytic Study of College Women’s resistance to sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(14), 2527–2547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513520470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, L., & Munro, V. E. (2009a). Of ‘normal sex’ and ‘real rape’: Exploring the use of socio-sexual scripts in (mock) jury deliberation. Social & Legal Studies, 18(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663909339083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, L., & Munro, V. E. (2009b). Turning mirrors into windows? Assessing the impact of (mock) juror education in rape trials. The British Journal of Criminology, 49(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azp013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Linville, P. W. (1980). What does the schema Concept Buy us? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(4), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728064006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., Stelter, A., Tóth, K., Rölke, H., & Klieme, E. (2014). The time on task effect in reading and problem solving is moderated by task difficulty and skill: Insights from a computer-based large-scale assessment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., Cossins, A., & O'Brien, K. (2010). Enhancing the credibility of complainants in child sexual assault trials: The effect of expert evidence and judicial directions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(6), 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., & Cossins, A. (2017). What Australian jurors know and do not know about evidence in child sexual abuse. Criminal Law Journal, 41, 86–103. https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/en/publications/what-australian-jurors-know-and-do-not-know-about-evidence-in-chi
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravelin, C. R., Biernat, M., & Bucher, C. (2019). Blaming the Victim of Acquaintance Rape: Individual, situational, and sociocultrual factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, E. M., Berry, M. A., & Rodriguez, D. N. (2011). The influence of rape myth acceptance, sexual attitudes, and belief in a just world on attributions of responsibility in a date rape scenario. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16(2), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532510X499887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehle, J. (2012). Attrition and conviction rates of sexual offences in Europe: Definitions and criminal justice responses. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 18(1), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-011-9163-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judicial Studies Board. (2010). Crown court benchbook. Judicial Studies Board.
   Google Scholar
• Kassing, L. R., Beesley, D., & Frey, L. L. (2005). Gender role conflict, homophobia, age, and education as predictors of male rape myth acceptance. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 27(4), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.27.4.9wfm24f52kqgav37
   Google Scholar
• Kleider, H. M., Knuycky, L. R., & Cavrak, S. E. (2012). Deciding the fate of others: The cognitive underpinnings of racially biased juror decision making. Journal of General Psychology, 139(3), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2012.686462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, J. J., & Meixner, J. B., Jr (2017). Jury simulation goals. In M. B. Kovera (Ed.), The psychology of juries (pp. 161–183). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Krahé, B., Bieneck, S., & Scheinberger-Olwig, R. (2007). Adolescents’ sexual scripts: Schematic representations of consensual and nonconsensual Heterosexual interactions. The Journal of Sex Research, 44(4), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701580923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, D. A., & Lieberman, J. D. (2017). Managing different aspects of validity in trial simulation research. In M. B. Kovera (Ed.), The psychology of juries (pp. 185–205). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, J., & Rothbart, M. (1988). Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z., Miller, D. T., & Claire, T. (1990). Combining Social concepts: The role of causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 14(4), 551–577. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1404_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103(2), 284–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (1989). Effects of chronological presentation of information on processing and memory for broadcast news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 33(4), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158909364093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, J. D. (2011). The utility of scientific jury selection: Still murky After 30 years. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410396628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert, A. M., & Golding, J. M. (2016). Scamming elders: The effect of witness testimony on courtroom perceptions of elder financial abuse. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 34(2), 5–31. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-23530-001
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, H., Tabernik, H., Canales, E. J., & Backstrom, T. (2009). Risky situation or harmless fun? A qualitative examination of college women’s bad hook-up and rape scripts. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 60(11-12), 793–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9586-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littleton, H. L., & Axsom, D. (2003). Rape and Seduction Scripts of University students: Implications for rape attributions and unacknowledged rape. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 49(9-10), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025824505185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littleton, H. L., Axsom, D., & Yoder, M. (2006). Priming of consensual and nonconsensual sexual scripts: An experimental test of the role of scripts in rape attributions. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 54(7-8), 557–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9017-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littleton, H. L., & Dodd, J. C. (2016). Violent attacks and damaged victims: An exploration of the rape scripts of European American and african American U.S. College women. Violence Against Women, 22(14), 1725–1747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216631438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(2), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Milne, A. B. (1995). The dissection of selection in person perception: Inhibitory processes in social stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magyarics, C. L., Lynch, K. R., Golding, J. M., & Lippert, A. (2015). The impact of frequency of behavior and type of contact on judgments involving a criminal stalking case. Law and Human Behavior, 39(6), 602–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malamuth, N. M. (1981). Rape proclivity Among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37(4), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01075.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masser, B., Lee, K., & McKimmie, B. M. (2010). Bad woman, bad victim? Disentangling the effects of victim stereotypicality, gender stereotypicality and benevolent sexism on acquaintance rape victim blame. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 62(7-8), 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9648-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active Men and women: Continuity and change. Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.661102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKimmie, B. M., Masser, B. M., & Bongiorno, R. (2014). What counts as rape? The effect of offense prototypes, victim stereotypes, and participant gender on How the Complainant and defendant are perceived. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(12), 2273–2303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513518843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKimmie, B. M., Masser, B. M., Nitschke, F., Lee, H., & Schuller, R. A. (2020). The impact of schemas on decision-making in cases involving allegations of sexual violence. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 32(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2020.1829780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millsteed, M., & McDonald, C. (2017, February 2). Attrition of sexual offence incidents across the Victorian Criminal Justice System. Crime Statistics Agency. https://www.crimestatistics.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/embridge_cache/emshare/original/public/2017/01/fd/8d51b2494/20170202_SexualOffenceAttrition_FinalReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 34(2), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.34.2.186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitschke, F. T., Masser, B. M., McKimmie, B. M., & Riachi, M. (2021). Intoxicated But Not incapacitated: Are There effective Methods to assist juries in interpreting evidence of voluntary Complainant intoxication in cases of rape? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9-10), 4335–4359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518790601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2018, February 8). Sexual offences in England and Wales: year ending March 2017. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/sexualoffencesinenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2017
   Google Scholar
• Office of Public Affairs. (2012, January 6). An Updated Definition of Rape. The United States Department of Justice Archives. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/blog/updated-definition-rape
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, D. C. (1982). Witnesses and their testimony: Effects of ordering on juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12(4), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1982.tb00868.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). The story model for juror decision making. In R. Hastie (Ed.), Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making (pp. 192–221). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Planty, M., & Krebs, C. (2013, May 31). Female Victims of Sexual Violence, 1994-2010. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fvsv9410.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp. 33–58). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. M. (1988). Rape and Seduction scripts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00939.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. (2011, August). Acquaintance Rape of College Students. https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/default/files/problems/PDFs/Acquaintance_Rape_of_College_Students.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sexual Offences Act. (2003). (UK) s. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. W., Lee, A. Y., Bessenoff, G. R., & Frost, L. A. (1998). Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: Encoding flexibility under cognitive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. W., Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Attention and stereotyping: Cognitive constraints on the construction of meaningful Social impressions. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 145–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772043000022
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, H. C., & Bourne, L. E. (1998). Cycle of blame or just world: Effects of legal verdicts on gender patterns in rape-myth acceptance and victim empathy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(4), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00178.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, O., & Skinner, T. (2017). How rape myths are used and challenged in rape and sexual assault trials. Social & Legal Studies, 26(4), 441–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663916680130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, T. L., Whiteside, S. P., & Golding, J. M. (2000). The effectiveness of expert witnesses in civil trials involving repressed memories of sexual assault. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 18(4), 27–62. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-16075-002
   Google Scholar
• Stone, V. A. (1969). A primacy effect in decision-making by jurors. Journal of Communication, 19(3), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1969.tb00846.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, S. M., McKimmie, B. M., & Masser, B. M. (2019). Rape perpetrators on trial: The effect of sexual assault–related schemas on attributions of blame. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(2), 310–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516640777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, C. A. (2017). Integrating concepts of trial advocacy into juror decision-making research. In M. B. Kovera (Ed.), The psychology of juries (pp. 59–82). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Suarez, E., & Gadalla, T. M. (2010). Stop Blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2010–2035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509354503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Süssenbach, P., Eyssel, F., Rees, J., & Bohner, G. (2017). Looking for blame: Rape myth acceptance and Attention to victim and perpetrator. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(15), 2323–2344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515591975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterhouse, G. F., Reynolds, A., & Egan, V. (2016). Myths and legends: The reality of rape offences reported to a UK police force. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatcroft, J. M., Wagstaff, G. F., & Moran, A. (2009). Revictimizing the victim? How rape victims experience the UK legal system. Victims & Offenders, 4(3), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880903048529
   Google Scholar
• Wright, G., & Ayton, P. (1988). Decision time, subjective probability, and task difficulty. Memory & Cognition, 16(2), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar