1,432
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

High eyewitness confidence is always compelling: that’s a problem

, , , , , & show all
Pages 120-141 | Received 21 Aug 2019, Accepted 10 Mar 2021, Published online: 06 Feb 2022

References

  • Aust, F., & Barth, M. (2018). papaja: Create APA manuscripts with R Markdown. https://github.com/crsh/papaja
  • Berkowitz, S. R., Garrett, B. L., Fenn, K. M., & Loftus, E. F. (2020). Convicting with confidence? Why we should not over-rely on eyewitness confidence. Memory (Hove, England), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1849308
  • Bradfield, A., & McQuiston, D. E. (2004). When does evidence of eyewitness confidence inflation affect judgments in a criminal trial? Law and Human Behavior, 28(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000039331.54147.ff
  • Brewer, N., & Burke, A. (2002). Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 26(3), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015380522722
  • Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2006). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.12.1.11
  • Brodes v. State, 614 SE 2d 766 (2005).
  • Buchanan, E. M., Gillenwaters, A., Scofield, J. E., & Valentine, K. (2019). MOTE: Measure of the effect: Package to assist in effect size calculations and their confidence intervals. http://github.com/doomlab/MOTE
  • Budescu, D. V., & Wallsten, T. S. (1985). Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90007-X
  • Carlson, C. A., Young, D. F., Weatherford, D. R., Carlson, M. A., Bednarz, J. E., & Jones, A. R. (2016). The influence of perpetrator exposure time and weapon presence/timing on eyewitness confidence and accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 898–910.
  • Cokely, E. T., Feltz, A., Ghazal, S., Allan, J. N., Petrova, D., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2018). Decision making skill: From intelligence to numeracy and expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd Eds.) (pp. 476–505). Cambridge University Press.
  • Cutler, B. L., Dexter, H. R., & Penrod, S. D. (1990). Nonadversarial methods for sensitizing jurors to eyewitness evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(14), 1197–1207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00400.x
  • Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relation. Public Policy & Law, 1(4), 817–845. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.1.4.817
  • Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064273
  • Dillon, M. K., Jones, A. M., Bergold, A. N., Hui, C. Y. T., & Penrod, S. D. (2017). Henderson instructions: Do they enhance evidence evaluation? Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 17(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2017.1235964
  • Dodson, C. S., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). Misinterpreting eyewitness expressions of confidence: The featural justification effect. Law and Human Behavior, 39(3), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000120
  • Dodson, C. S., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2016). Confidence and eyewitness identifications: The cross-race effect, decision time and accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 113–125.
  • Garrett, B. (2011). Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutors go wrong. Harvard University Press.
  • Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98(4), 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.4.506
  • Goodsell, C. A., Neuschatz, J. S., & Gronlund, S. D. (2009). Effects of mugshot commitment on lineup performance in young and older adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(6), 788–803. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1512
  • Grabman, J. H., Dobolyi, D. G., Berelovich, N. L., & Dodson, C. S. (2019). Predicting high confidence errors in eyewitness memory: The role of face recognition ability, decision- time, and justifications. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.02.002
  • Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90013-R
  • Hamm, R. H., Beasley, W. H., & Johnson, W. J. (2014). A balance beam aid for instruction in clinical diagnostic reasoning. Medical Decision Making, 34(7), 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14529623
  • Jones, E. E., Williams, K. D., & Brewer, N. (2008). “I had a confidence epiphany!”: Obstacles to combating post-identification confidence inflation. Law and Human Behavior, 32(2), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9101-0
  • Jones v. State, 537 SE 2d 80 (2000).
  • Kassin, S. M., & Neumann, K. (1997). On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 21(5), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024871622490
  • Kassin, S. M., & Sommers, S. R. (1997). Inadmissible testimony, instructions to disregard, and the jury: Substantive versus procedural considerations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(10), 1046–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672972310005
  • Kennedy, J. A., Anderson, C., & Moore, D. A. (2013). When overconfidence is revealed to others: Testing the status-enhancement theory of overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.08.005
  • Key, K. (2019). Improving juror sensitivity to eyewitness confidence inflation using a visual aid. Open Access Dissertation, University of Oklahoma. Retrieved from: https://shareok.org/handle/11244/299932
  • Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12(4), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
  • Mickes, L. (2015). Receiver operating characteristic analysis and confidence–accuracy characteristic analysis in investigations of system variables and estimator variables that affect eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.01.003
  • Mickes, L., Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (2017). Distilling the confidence-accuracy message: A comment on Wixted and Wells (2017). Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100617699240
  • National Registry of Exonerations. (2018). Contributing factors and type of crime. Retrieved from http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/ExonerationsContribFactorsByCrime.aspx
  • Neuschatz, J. S., Wetmore, S. A., Key, K. N., Cash, D. K., Gronlund, S. D., & Goodsell, C. A. (2016). A comprehensive evaluation of showups. In B. Bornstein, & M. K. Miller (Eds.), Advances in Psychology and Law (pp. 43–69). Springer.
  • New Jersey v. Henderson, 208 N. J. 208, 287 (2011).
  • Pawlenko, N. B., Safer, M. A., Wise, R. A., & Holfeld, B. (2013). A teaching aid for improving jurors' assessments of eyewitness accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2895
  • Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1991). A cognitive theory of juror decision making: The story model. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 519–558.
  • Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
  • R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  • Revelle, W. (2018). Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
  • Semmler, C., Dunn, J., Mickes, L., & Wixted, J. T. (2018). The role of estimator variables in eyewitness identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(3), 400–415.
  • Sniezek, J. A., Paese, P. W., & Switzer, F. S. (1990). The effect of choosing on confidence in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46(2), 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90032-5
  • State v. Mitchell, 275 P.3d 905 (2012).
  • Steblay, N. K., Wells, G. L., & Douglass, A. B. (2014). The eyewitness post identification feedback effect 15 years later: Theoretical and policy implications. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000001
  • Tenney, E. R., MacCoun, R. J., Spellman, B. A., & Hastie, R. (2007). Calibration trumps confidence as a basis for witness credibility. Psychological Science, 18(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01847.x
  • Thomas, J. P., & McFadyen, R. G. (1995). The confidence heuristic: A game-theoretic analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(94)00032-6
  • Warnes, G. R., Bolker, B., Gorjanc, G., Grothendieck, G., Korosec, A., Lumley, T., … others. (2017). Gdata: Various R programming tools for data manipulation. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gdata
  • Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.5.553
  • Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). “Good, you identified the suspect:” feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.360
  • Wells, G. L., Memon, A., & Penrod, S. D. (2006). Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(2), 45–75.
  • Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
  • Wickham, H., & Bryan, J. (2019). Readxl: Read excel files. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readxl
  • Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., & Müller, K. (2019). Dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. https://cran.r-project.org/package=dplyr
  • Winston, C. (2014). Extrafont: Tools for using fonts. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=extrafont
  • Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., Clark, S. E., Dunn, J. C., & Wells, W. (2016). Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113(2), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516814112
  • Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., Clark, S. E., Gronlund, S. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2015). Initial eyewitness confidence reliably predicts eyewitness identification accuracy. American Psychologist, 70(6), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039510
  • Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2018). Rethinking the reliability of eyewitness memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(3), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617734878
  • Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18(1), 10–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616686966
  • Xie, Y. (2015). Dynamic documents with R and knitr (2nd ed.). Chapman; Hall/CRC. https://yihui.name/knitr/

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.