Juror perceptions of excited utterance hearsay testimony in an adult sexual assault case

References

• Albonetti, C. A. (1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law & Society Review, 21(2), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baicker-McKee, S. (2017). The excited utterance paradox. Seattle University Law Review, 41, 111–178. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3091654
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, B. L., Golding, J. M., Stevenson, M. C., Wiley, T. R. A., & Yozwiak, J. A. (2007). A review of factors affecting jurors’ decisions in child sexual abuse cases. In J. D. Read, D. Ross, M. Toglia, & R. Lindsay (Eds.), The psychology of eyewitness memory (pp. 509–543). Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1450
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Perceptions of child credibility in sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(8), 702–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00608.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. (2008). The psychological impact of rape victims. American Psychologist, 63(8), 702–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, S. S. (1997). Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. Law and Human Behavior, 21(5), 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102483190837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, E. E., Golding, J. M., Hodell, E. C., & Marsil, D. F. (2007). Perceptions of elder physical abuse in the courtroom: The influence of hearsay witness testimony. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 19(3-4), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1300/J084v19n03_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, E. E., Hodell, E. C., & Golding, J. M. (2008). The use of hearsay testimony on behalf of an elder victim of abuse: A reasonable and necessary alternative under certain circumstances. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8(4), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228930802199374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield, D. S. (2019). The impact of expert witness gender and length of testimony on jury decision making in not guilty by reason of insanity trials. [Doctoral dissertation, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology]. ProQuest Dissertation Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal rules of evidence. (2019). Michigan Legal Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Frohmann, L. (1991). Discrediting victim’s allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejection. Social Problems, 38(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/800530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frohmann, L. (1997). Convictability and discordant locales: Reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decision-making. Law & Society Review, 31(3), 531–556. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding, J. M., Alexander, M. C., & Stewart, T. L. (1999). The effect of hearsay witness age in a child sexual assault trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(2), 420–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.5.2.420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding, J. M., Lynch, K. R., & Wasarhaley, N. E. (2016). Impeaching rape victims in criminal court: Does concurrent civil action hurt justice? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(19), 3129–3149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515584342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding, J. M., Sanchez, R., & Sego, S. (1997). The believability of hearsay testimony in a child sexual assault trial. Law and Human Behavior, 21(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024842816130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, E. M., Berry, M. A., & Rodriguez, D. N. (2011). The influence of rape myth acceptance, sexual attitudes, and belief in a just world on attributions of responsibility in a date rape scenario. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16(2), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532510X499887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hohmeier, J. (2010). Excited utterance and cortisol: Reality, justice, and that bumpy road on the search for truth. Thomas M. Cooley Law Review, 27, 647–678.
   Google Scholar
• Hummert, M. L. (1990). Multiple stereotypes of elderly and young adults: A comparison of structure and evaluations. Psychology and Aging, 5(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.5.2.182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehn, A., Gray, J. M., & Nunez, N. L. (2007). Hearsay testimony: Protecting the needs of children at the expense of the defendant’s right to a fair trial. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 7(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1300/J158v07n01_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kentucky Revised Statutes § 510.010. (2018). https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/statutes/statute.aspx?id=47587
   Google Scholar
• Le Grand, A. M., Jenkins, B. D., Golding, J. M., Neuschatz, J. M., Pals, A. M., & Wetmore, S. A. (2021). The sobering effects of jailhouse informant testimony on perceptions of an intoxicated rape victim. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 43(3), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2021.1896520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlefield, D. (2017, June 24). Rape trials: What happens when there is no victim testimony? The San Diego Union-Tribune.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. R., Jewell, J. A., Wasarhaley, N. E., Golding, J. M., & Renzetti, C. M. (2020). Great sexpectations: The impact of participant gender, defendant desirability, and date cost on attributions of a date rape victim and defendant. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(17-18), 3437–3461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517709800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. R., Wasarhaley, N. E., Golding, J. M., & Simcic, T. (2013). Who bought the drinks? Juror perceptions of intoxication in a rape trial. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(16), 3205–3222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513496900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, M. R., & Parker, J. F. (2001). When will a child be believed? The impact of the victim’s age and juror’s gender on children’s credibility and verdict in a sexual-abuse case. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25(4), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00224-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGough, L. S. (1994). Child witnesses: Fragile voices in the American legal system. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. E., & Oudekerk, B. A. (2019). Criminal victimization, 2018. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D. F., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Marsil, D. F. (1999). The impact of hearsay testimony on conviction rates in trials of child sexual abuse: Toward balancing the rights of defendants and child witnesses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(2), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.5.2.439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevier, J. (2015). Popularizing hearsay. Georgetown Law Journal, 104, 643–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. G., Chen, J., Basile, K. C., Gilbert, L. K., Merrick, M. T., Patel, N., Walling, M., & Jain, A. (2017). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010-2012 state report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Spears, J. W., & Spohn, C. C. (1997). The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Justice Quarterly, 14(3), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829700093451
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., Beichner, D., & Davis-Frenzel, E. (2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the ‘gateway to justice’. Social Problems, 48(2), 206–235. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2001.48.2.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanko, E. A. (1982). Would you believe this woman? Prosecutorial screening for ‘credible’ witnesses and a problem of justice. In N. Rafter & E. Stanko (Eds.), Judge, lawyer, victim, thief: Women, gender roles, and criminal justice (pp. 63–82). Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• State v. Silva, 670 P.2d 737 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Titcomb, C. R. (2010). First impressions from the jury box: How the length of expert witness testimony influences mock trial deliberations. [Master’s dissertation, The University of Alabama]. ProQuest Dissertation Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the national violence against women survey. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1037/e513832006-001
   Google Scholar
• Tran, J. (2005). Crying wolf or an excited utterance? Allowing reexcited statements to qualify under the excited utterance exception. Cleveland State Law Review, 52, 527–550.
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Sheets, 125 F.R.D. 172, 178 (D. Utah 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, R. L., Krauss, D. A., & Lieberman, J. D. (2011). Mock jury research: Where do we go from here? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29(3), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigmore, J. H. (1974). Evidence in trials at common law. (J. H. Chadbourn, Rev. ed., Vol. 5). Aspen Publishing.
   Google Scholar