Eyewitness testimony in native and second languages

References

• Aitchison, J. (2000). The seeds of speech: Language origin and evolution (Carto). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akamine, A., Tanaka, S., Tanaka, A., Shibata, K., Ozaki, Y., & Naka, M. (2018). 司法における多専門・多職種連携と心理学—外国人被告人の心理査定 [multidisciplinary and multi-agency team approach with psychology in forensic: Mental measurement of foreign defenders]. 法と心理, 18(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.20792/jjlawpsychology.18.0_56
   Google Scholar
• Allwood, C. M., Innes-Ker, ÅH, Homgren, J., & Fredin, G. (2008). Children’s and adults’ realism in their event-recall confidence in responses to free recall and focused questions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(6), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160801961231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G. (2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 859–873. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E., & Craik, F. I. M. (2010). Cognitive and linguistic processing in the bilingual mind. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409358571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, N., Vagadia, A. N., Hope, L., & Gabbert, F. (2018). Interviewing witnesses: Eliciting coarse-grain information. Law and Human Behavior, 42(5), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, R., Cooke, C., Hatcher, R., Woodhams, J., Bilby, C., & Grant, T. (2006). Criminal PSYCHOLOGY: A beginners’ Guide (1st ed.). Oneworld Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, L., & Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1999). The cognitive interview: Much more than simply “try again”. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5(1–2), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169908414993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyewitness Guideline Standing Committee. (2005). 目撃供述・識別手続きに関するガイドライン [Guideline for eyewitness statement and identification procedures]. 現代人文社.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-Enhancing techniques for Investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Charlse C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R. E., & Fisher, R. P. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12(1), 74–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R. E., & Fisher, R. P. (1988). The cognitive interview: An innovative technique for questioning witnesses of crime. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 4(2), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02806548
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., & Pansky, A. (2005). Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting over time. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., & Weinberg-Eliezer, A. (2002). Strategic regulation of grain size memory reporting.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habuchi, Y., Marszalenko, J., & Uemiya, A. (2018). 司法面接の新展開—外国人を対象とした司法面接の取り組み— [New stage of the forensic interview: The forensic engagement for foreigners]. 法と心理, 18(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.20792/jjlawpsychology.18.0_41
   Google Scholar
• Haden, C. A., Haine, R. A., & Fivush, R. (1997). Developing narrative structure in parent-child reminiscing across the preschool years. Developmental Psychology, 33(2), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.2.295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z., & Naka, M. (2020). Using temporary interpreters in mock forensic interviews. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09381-3
   Google Scholar
• Itzhak, I., Vingron, N., Baum, S. R., & Titone, D. (2017). Bilingualism in the real world: How proficiency, emotion, and personality in a second language impact communication in clinical and legal settings. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000103
   Google Scholar
• Jack, F., Leov, J., & Zajac, R. (2014). Age-related differences in the free-recall accounts of child, adolescent, and adult witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, F., Martyn, E., & Zajac, R. (2015). Getting the picture: Effects of sketch plans and photographs on children's, adolescents' and adults' eyewitness recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(5), 723–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jared, D., Pei Yun Poh, R., & Paivio, A. (2013). L1 and L2 picture naming in mandarin-English bilinguals: A test of bilingual dual coding theory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E. (2015). R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Volume 3 socioemotional processed. 7th ed.. John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2008). G. Davies , & R. Bull (Eds.), Tell me what happened: Structured Investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. 1st ed. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2007). Interpreting inexplicit language during courtroom examination. Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about "weapon focus.". Law and Human Behavior, 11(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddux, J. (2010). Recommendations for forensic evaluators conducting interpreter-mediated interviews. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2010.483343
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, L. C., Orbach, Y., Lamb, M. E., & Walker, A. G. (2017). “How” and “Why” prompts in forensic investigative interviews with preschool children. Applied Developmental Science, 21(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1158652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum, N., Brewer, N., & Weber, N. (2019). A measure of perceived informativeness for investigations of eyewitness memory reporting. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(2), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum, N. A., Brewer, N., & Weber, N. (2016). Memorial monitoring and control: How confidence and social and financial consequences affect eyewitnesses’ reporting of fine-grain information. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(3), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. (2011). Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: guidance on interviewing victims and witnesses, and guidance on using special measures. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/achieving-best-evidence-criminal-proceedings-guidance-interviewing-victims-and.
   Google Scholar
• Nakane, I. (2007). Problems in communicating the suspect’s rights in interpreted police interviews. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Public Safety Commission. (2019). 犯罪捜査規範 [Criminal investigation law]. https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/search/elawsSearch/elaws_search/lsg0500/detail?lawId=332M50400000002
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1975). Coding distinctions and Repetition Effects in memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MOTIVATION advances in research and theory (Vol. 9, pp. 179–214). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60271-6
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 45(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (2014). Bilingual Dual Coding Theory and memory. In R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Foundations of bilingual memory (pp. 41–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9218-4_3
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A., Clark, J. M., & Lambert, W. E. (1988). Bilingual dual-coding theory and semantic repetition effects on recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(1), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.1.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A., & Desrochers, A. (1980). A dual-coding approach to bilingual memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 34(4), 388–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A., & Lambert, W. (1981). Dual coding and bilingual memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(5), 532–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90156-0
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, E., Oxburgh, G., Gavin, A., & Myklebust, T. (2012). Investigative interviews with victims of child sexual abuse: The relationship between question type and investigation relevant information. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9093-z
   Google Scholar
• Pruss, N. (2008). The effects of using a scripted or unscripted interview in forensic interviews with interpreters [Doctoral dissertation]. In Open Access Theses & Dissertations. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/335
   Google Scholar
• The Ministry of Justice. (2017). 民事訴訟法 [Code of Civil Procedure]. https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/search/elawsSearch/elaws_search/lsg0500/detail?lawId=408AC0000000109#821.
   Google Scholar
• The Ministry of Justice. (2019). 刑事訴訟法 [Code of Criminal Procedure]. https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/search/elawsSearch/elaws_search/lsg0500/detail?lawId=323AC0000000131#622.
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1971). Retrieval processes in recognition memory: Effects of associative context. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87(1), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030186
   Google Scholar
• Weber, N., & Brewer, N. (2008). Eyewitness recall: Regulation of grain size and the role of confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.1.50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A. (2003). Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfman, M., Brown, D., & Jose, P. (2016). Taking stock: Evaluating the conduct of forensic interviews with children in New Zealand. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(6), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2016.1168426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, S., Yamamoto, S., Shibuya, Y., & Naka, M. (2019). 事情聴取における聴取者の発問タイプと被聴取者から得られる情報量の関連 [relation between interview question types and the amount of information collected from witness interviews]. 立命館人間科学研究, 38, 47–57. http://hdl.handle.net/10367/11546
   Google Scholar