Objection, your Honour: examining the questioning practices of Canadian judges

References

• Altmann, E. M., Trafton, J. G., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2014). Momentary interruptions can detail the train of thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, P., Fisher, R. P., & Cutler, B. C. (1999). Examining the cognitive interview in a double test paradigm. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5(1–2), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169908414992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, B. R., & George, R. (1996). A field evaluation of training in three methods of witness/victim investigative interviewing. Psychology, Crime and Law, 2(3), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169608409780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient for agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G. M., Westcott, H. L., & Horan, N. (2000). The impact of questioning styles on the content of investigative interviews with suspects child abuse victims. Psychology, Crime and Law, 6(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160008410834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, L., & Wheatcroft, J. M. (2010). Exploring the influence of courtroom questioning and pre-trial preparation on adult witness accuracy. https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law-research-expertise/dir-record/research-projects/745/exploring-the-influence-of-courtroom-questioning-and-pre-trial-preparation-on-eyewitness-accuracy
   Google Scholar
• Farrugia, L., & Gabbert, F. (2020). Vulnerable suspects in police interviews: Exploring current practice in England and Wales. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 17(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P. (1995). Interviewing victims and witnesses of crime. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1(4), 732–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.1.4.732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., & Raymond, D. S. (1987). Critical analysis of police interview techniques. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15(3), 177–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FPT Heads of Prosecutions Committee Working Group. (2004). Report on the prevention of miscarriages of justice. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Fritzley, V. H., & Lee, K. (2003). Do young children always say yes to yes-no questions? A metadevelopmental study of the affirmation bias. Child Development, 74(5), 1297–1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. A. E., & Fisher, R. P. (2006). The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(6), 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A., & Milne, R. (2006). Will it all end in tiers? Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In T. A. Williamson (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation (pp. 167–189). Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J. J., & Wistrich, A. J. (2002). Judging by heuristic-cognitive illusions in judicial decision making. Judicature, 86(1), 44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, L. A. (2014). Do older adults change their eyewitness reports when re-questioned? The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(3), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill v. Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Services Board. (2007). 3 SCR 129.
   Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. R., Deprez, S., & Wagstaff, G. F. (2003). The direct and cross-examination of complainants and defendants in rape trials: A quantitative analysis of question type. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160308139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. R., Hatton, C., & Johnson, S. D. (2004). Witnesses with intellectual disabilities in court: What questions are asked and what influence do they have? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532504322776834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. R., & Johnson, S. D. (2000). Lawyers’ questioning: The effect of confusing questions on witness confidence and accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 24(6), 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005548102819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, R., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassiter, D. G., Diamond, S. S., Schmidt, H. C., & Elek, J. K. (2007). Evaluating videotaped confessions: Expertise provides no defense against the camera-perspective effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01879.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lively, C. J., Fallon, L., Snook, B., & Fahmy, W. (2020). Seeking or controlling the truth? An examination of courtroom questioning practices by Canadian lawyers. Psychology, Crime and Law, 26(4), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1669595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning and Memory, 12(4), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., & Zanni, G. (1975). Eyewitness testimony: The influence of the wording of a question. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5(1), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S., Snook, B., & Milne, R. (2016). Witness interview training: A field evaluation. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9197-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Holley, A., Milne, R., Koehnken, G., & Bull, R. (1994). Towards understanding the effects of interviewer training in evaluating the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8(7), 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350080704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., & Vartoukian, R. (1996). The effects of repeated questioning on young children’s eyewitness testimony. British Journal of Psychology, 87(3), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02598.x
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2003). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Myklebust, T., & Alison, L. J. (2000). The current state of police interviews with children in Norway: How discrepant are they from models based on current issues in memory and communication? Psychology, Crime and Law, 6(4), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160008409810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Kelly, C. M., Kebbell, M. R., Hatton, C., & Johnson, S. D. (2003). Judicial intervention in court cases involving witnesses with and without learning disabilities. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532503322363004
   Google Scholar
• Oxburgh, G., Myklebust, T., & Grant, T. (2010). The question of question types in police interviews: A review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective. International Journal of Speech, Language, and the Law: Forensic Linguistics, 17(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattenden, R. (1990). Judicial discretion and criminal litigation (p. 26). Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearse, J., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1999). Measuring influential police interviewing tactics: A factor analytic approach. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532599167860
   Google Scholar
• Perry, N., McAuliff, B., Tam, P., Claycomb, L., Dostal, C., & Flanagan, C. (1995). When lawyers question children: Is justice served? Law and Human Behavior, 19(6), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips, S. U. (1998). Ideology in the language of judges: How judges practice law, politics, and courtroom control. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, D. A., & White, L. T. (1991). Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27(6), 975–986. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.6.975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound, R. (1959). Jurisprudence: Vol. 1-5. St. Paul. West Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. B., Fisher, R. P., & Wright, R. (2005). Investigating interviewing. In N. Brewer & K. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective (pp. 11–42). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Read, J. M., Powell, M. B., Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (2009). Investigative interviewing of suspect sex offenders: A review of what constitutes best practice. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 11(4), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2009.11.4.143
   Google Scholar
• Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada. (2002). SOR/2002-156.
   Google Scholar
• Scrivner, E., & Safer, M. A. (1988). Eyewitnesses show hypermnesia for details about a violent event. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, E. (2007). Investigative interviewing. The conversation management approach. Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Snook, B., & Keating, K. (2011). A field study of adult witness interviewing practices in a Canadian police organization. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16(1), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532510X497258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snook, B., Luther, K., Quinlan, H., & Milne, R. (2012). Let ‘em talk! A field study of police questioning practices of suspects and accused persons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(10), 1328–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812449216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2016). Discourse, identity, and social change in the marriage equality debates. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Parks, R. M. (2012). Tough questioning’ as enactment of ideology in judicial conduct: Marriage law appeals in seven US courts. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 19(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v19i1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turtle, J. W., & Yuille, J. C. (1994). Lost but not forgotten details: Repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, D. B., & Kassin, S. M. (2012). Harmless error analysis: How do judges respond to confession errors? Law and Human Behavior, 36(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. W., & Milne, R. (2008). Keeping the PEACE? A study of investigative interviewing practices in the public sector. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532506X157179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatcroft, J. M., Wagstaff, G. F., & Kebbell, M. R. (2004). The influence of courtroom questioning style on actual and perceived eyewitness confidence and accuracy. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532504322776870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wistrich, A. J., Guthrie, C., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2005). Can judges ignore inadmissible information? The difficulty of deliberately disregarding. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 153(4), 1251–1345. https://doi.org/10.2307/4150614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. M., & Alison, L. J. (2004). Questioning sequences in Canadian police interviews: Constructing and confirming the course of events? Psychology, Crime and Law, 10(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316031000099120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, R., & Cannan, P. (2009). Cross-examination of sexual assault complainants: A developmental comparison. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16(sup1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710802620448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, R., Westera, N., & Kaladelfos, A. (2018). The “good old days” of courtroom questioning: Changes in the format of child cross-examination questions over 60 years. Child Maltreatment, 23(2), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559517733815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar