Perspectives of juror-eligible adults: validation of the Juror Questionnaire of Values and Viewpoints (JQVV) for capital cases

References

• Anwar, S., Bayer, P., & Hjalmarsson, R. (2012). The impact of jury race in criminal trials. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(2), 1017–1055. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldus, D. C., Woodworth, G., & Pulaski, C. A. (1990). Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis. Upne.
   Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., Duenser, A., Moltchanova, E., & Zawieska, K. (2015). Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment. PLoS ONE, 10(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, M., & Farber, B. A. (2016). Lying in psychotherapy: Why and what clients don’t tell their therapist about therapy and their relationship. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 29(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2015.1085365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasberg, S. A., Rogers, K. H., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). The Bidimensional Impression Management Index (BIMI): Measuring agentic and communal forms of impression management. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(5), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.862252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, J. H., Johnson, S. L., & Sundby, S. E. (2007). Competent capital representation: The necessity of knowing and heeding what jurors tell us about mitigation. Hofstra Law Review, 36(3), 1035–1066.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, V. R. (1968). Mr. Prejudice, Miss Sympathy, and the authoritarian personality: An application of psychological measuring techniques to the problem of jury bias. Wisconsin Law Review, 734, 734–750.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, W. J., Steiner, B. D., & Sandys, M. (2001). Death sentencing in black and white: An empirical analysis of the role of jurors’ race and jury racial composition. Journal of Constitution Law, 3(1), 171–274.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, R. M., & Noble, A. (1978). Authoritarianism and decision of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1424–1430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broda-Bahm, K. (2013). Getting beyond can you be fair: Framing your cause questions. Jury Expert, 25(4), 10.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, B., & Moran, G. (2007). The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons’ evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., & Waggoner, P. D. (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research & Politics, 2(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015622072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, R. J., Clark, J. W., Kehn, I. I. I., Burks, A. C., & Wechsler, H. J. (2014). A mock juror investigation of blame attribution in the punishment of hate crime perpetrators. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37(6), 551–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Culhane, S. E., Hosch, H. M., & Weaver, W. G. (2004). Crime victims serving as jurors: Is there bias present? Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 649–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-004-0792-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, B. L., Moran, G. P., & Narby, D. J. (1992). Jury selection in insanity defense cases. Journal of Research in Personality, 26(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(92)90052-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daftary-Kapur, T., Dumas, R., & Penrod, S. D. (2010). Jury decision-making biases and methods to counter them. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X465624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D., Davis, D., & Follette, W. C. (2003). Jurors can be selected: Noninformation, misinformation, and their strategic uses for jury selection. In W. T. O'Donohue & E. Levensky (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology: Resource for mental health and legal professionals (pp. 781–805). Elsevier Science & Technology.
   Google Scholar
• De Lorenzo, M. S. (2013). Employee mental illness: Managing the hidden epidemic. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 25(4), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-013-9226-x
   Google Scholar
• de Villiers, M. (2010). The impartiality doctrine: Constitutional meaning and judicial impact. American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 34, 71–105.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., & Caughlin, D. E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., & Kelly, C. E. (2015). Life or death: An examination of jury sentencing with the Capital Jury Project database. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(4), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhardt, J. L., Davies, P. G., Purdie-Vaughns, V. J., & Johnson, S. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17(5), 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01716.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, A. M. (2017). Removal of women and African Americans in jury selection in South Carolina capital cases, 1997-2012. NEULJ, 9(2), 299–345.
   Google Scholar
• Espinoza, R. K. E., & Willis-Esqueda, C. (2008). Defendant and defense attorney characteristics and their effects on juror decision making and prejudice against Mexican Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(4), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fals-Stewart, W., & Lucente, S. (1997). Identifying positive dissimulation by substance-abusing individuals on the Personality Assessment Inventory: A cross-validation study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(2), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6802_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, D. (2014). Neuro-voir dire and the architecture of bias. Hastings Law Journal, 65(4), 999–1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosso, C. M., & O’Brien, B. (2019). Lawyers and jurors: Interrogating voir dire strategies by analyzing conversations. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 16(3), 515–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney, C., Weill, J., & Lynch, M. (2015). The death penalty. In B. L. Cutler & P. A. Zapf (Eds.), APA handbook of forensic psychology, Vol. 2. Criminal investigation, adjudication, and sentencing outcomes (pp. 451–510). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14462-017
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, R. A. (2012). The problem of policing. Michigan Law Review, 110, 761–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heide, S., & Chan, T. (2018). Deaths in police custody. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 57, 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2016.01.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(3), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717 (1961).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. M., Jones, S., & Penrod, S. (2015). Examining legal authoritarianism in the impact of punishment severity on juror decisions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(10), 939–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1077244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1983). The construction and validation of a Juror Bias Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 423–442. https://doi.org/10.16/0092-6566(83)90070-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, M. G., Tay, L., & Harms, P. D. (2017). Systems perspective of Amazon Mechanical Turk for organizational research: Review and recommendations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleider, H. M., Knuycky, L. R., & Cavrak, S. E. (2012). Deciding the fate of others: The cognitive underpinnings of racially biased juror decision making. The Journal of General Psychology, 139(3), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2012.686462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovera, M. B., & Austin, J. L. (2016). Identifying juror bias: Moving from assessment and prediction to a new generation of jury selection research. In C. Willis-Esqueda & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), The witness stand and Lawrence S. Wrightsman, Jr. (pp. 75–94). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2077-8
   Google Scholar
• Kovera, M. B., & Cutler, B. L. (2013). Jury selection. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kravitz, D. A., Cutler, B. L., & Brock, P. (1993). Reliability and validity of the original and revised Legal Attitudes Questionnaire. Law and Human Behavior, 17(6), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, C. E., Arbuckle, S. A., & Holden, R. R. (2016). The Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale outperforms the BIDR impression management scale for identifying fakers. Journal of Research in Personality, 61, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langbein, J. H., Lerner, R. L., & Smith, B. P. (2009). History of the common law: The development of Anglo-American legal institutions (2nd ed.). Aspen Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lecci, L. B., Beck, C., & Myers, B. (2013). Assessing pretrial juror attitudes while controlling for order effects: An examination of effect sizes for the RLAQ, JBS, and PJAQ. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 31(3), 41–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lecci, L. B., & Myers, B. (2009). Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(7), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802477757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecci, L., & Myers, B. (2002). Examining the construct validity of the original and revised JBS: A cross-validation of sample and method. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016335422706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecci, L., & Myers, B. (2008). Individual differences in attitudes relevant to juror decision making: Development and validation of the Pretrial Juror Attitude Questionnaire (PJAQ). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(8), 2010–2038. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, J. D. (2007). Forgotten racial equality: Implicit bias, decision making, and misremembering. Duke Law Journal, 57, 345–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockhart v. McCree, 106 S. Ct. 1758 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1993). Foundations of validity: Meaning and consequences in psychological assessment. Educational Testing Services (ETS).
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narby, D. J., Cutler, B. L., & Moran, G. (1993). A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors’ perceptions of defendant culpability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, K. M., Patry, M. W., & Penrod, S. D. (2004). Exploring the effects of attitudes toward the death penalty on capital sentencing verdicts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.10.4.443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantazi, M., Klein, O., & Kissine, M. (2020). Is justice blind or myopic? An examination of the effects of meta-cognitive myopia and truth bias on mock jurors and judges. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(2), 214–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS): The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding-7: User’s manual. Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Pickel, K. L., Warner, T. C., Miller, T. J., & Barnes, Z. T. (2013). Conceptualizing defendants as minorities leads mock jurors to make biased evaluations in retracted confession cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosperi, A. (2018). Justice blindfolded: The historical course of an image. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, Y., Yang, H., Browning, C., Thomas, S., & Liu, M. (2015). Performance of screening tools in detecting major depressive disorder among patients with coronary heart disease: A systematic review. Medical Science Monitor, 21, 646–653. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.892537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., Rosenzweig, C., Moss, A. J., & Litman, L. (2019). Tapped out or barely tapped? Recommendations for how to harness the vast and largely unused potential of the Mechanical Turk participant pool. PLoS ONE, 14(12), e0226394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2008). Detection strategies for malingering and defensiveness. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering (3rd ed., pp. 14–35). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2018). Detection strategies for malingering and defensiveness. In R. Rogers & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering (4th ed., pp. 18–41). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Bender, S. D. (2018). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed.). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Hartigan, S. E. (2020). Juror Questionnaire of Values and Viewpoints (JQVV) [Unpublished test].
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Hartigan, S. E. (2021). The Juror Effectiveness Scale (JES) [Unpublished test].
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Hartigan, S. E., Sharf, A. J., Myers, B., Drogin, E. Y., & Williams, M. M. (2020). Capital juror questionnaires in death-penalty cases: A study of attitudes, denials, and deceptions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 38(1), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Williams, M. M., Winningham, D. B., & Sharf, A. J. (2018). An examination of PAI clinical descriptors and correlates in an outpatient sample: Tailoring of interpretive statements. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 40(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9627-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltzer, R., Venuti, M. A., & Lopes, G. M. (1991). Juror honesty during voir dire. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19(5), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(91)90019-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. L., & Bull, R. (2012). Identifying and measuring juror pre-trial bias for forensic evidence: Development and validation of the Forensic Evidence Evaluation Bias Scale. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(9), 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.561800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, D., & Pickles, A. (2018). Fact or fiction: Reducing the proportion and impact of false positives. Psychological Medicine, 48(7), 1084–1091. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329171700294X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tackett, J. L., Brandes, C. M., King, K. M., & Markon, K. E. (2019). Psychology’s replication crisis and clinical psychological science. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trahan, A., & Stewart, D. M. (2011). Examining capital jurors’ impressions of attorneys’ personal characteristics and their impact on sentencing outcomes. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 7(2), 93–105.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Const. amend. VI.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. M., Sicafuse, L. L., Miller, M. M., & Chomos, J. C. (2011). The influence of jurors’ perceptions of attorneys and their performance on verdict. The Jury Expert, 23(1), 23–41.
   Google Scholar