Reinforced self-affirmation as a method of reducing the misinformation effect: Towards ecological validity

References

• Adler, W. P. (1990). Effect of task appropriateness, social comparison, and feedback on female goals, performance, and self-confidence with a motor task. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 3162–3163.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, N. (2008). How self-confidence and knowledge effects the sources of information selected during purchase situations. Doctoral dissertation. Lubbock, Texas: Texas Tech University.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307301033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann, N., Beckmann, J. F., & Elliott, J. G. (2009). Self-confidence and performance goal orientation interactively predict performance in a reasoning test with accuracy feedback. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belli, R. F. (1989). Influences of misleading postevent information: Misinformation interference and acceptance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, H. (1998). Memory states and memory tasks: An integrative framework for eyewitness memory and suggestibility. Memory (Hove, England), 6(5), 481–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/741943086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, H., & Launay, C. (2014). How to protect eyewitness memory against the misinformation effect: A meta-analysis of post-warning studies. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A., & Brigham, J. C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 691–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2011). Eyewitness identification. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410389169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centofanti, A.T., & Reece, J. (2006). The cognitive interview and its effect on misleading postevent information, Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(6), 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160600558394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. K., & Langley, M. (2011). Paradoxical effects of testing: Retrieval enhances both accurate recall and suggestibility in eyewitnesses., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. K., Manley, K. D., & Lang, K. (2017). Retrieval-enhanced suggestibility: A retrospective and a new investigation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. K., Thomas, A. K., & Bulevich, J. B. (2009). Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility. Psychological Science, 20(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02245.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. K., Wilford, M. M., & Hughes, K. L. (2012). Retrieval can increase or decrease suggestibility depending on how memory is tested: The importance of source complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifasefi, S. L., Garry, M., Harper, D. N., Sharman, S. J., & Sutherland, R. (2007). Psychotropic placebos create resistance to the misinformation effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Compte, O., & Postlewaite, A. (2004). Confidence-enhanced performance. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1536–1557. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828043052204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupe, T., & Griffiths, M. (1996). Solving residential burglary. Crime detection and prevention series, 77. Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1989). Forensically relevant moderators of the relation between eyewitness identification accuracy and confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 650–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demo, D. H. (1992). The self-concept over time: Research issues and directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001511
   Google Scholar
• Echterhoff, G., Groll, S., & Hirst, W. (2007). Tainted truth: Overcorrection for misinformation influence on eyewitness memory. Social Cognition, 25(3), 367–409. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, S. M., & Nielson, K. A. (2010). Reduction of the misinformation effect by arousal induced after learning. Cognition, 117(2), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. NLM ID: 101244316. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbach, A., Eyal, T., & Finkelstein, S. R. (2010). How positive and negative feedback motivate goal pursuit. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(8), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00285.x
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL, England: Charles C Thomas Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2012). Protecting against misleading post-event information with a self-administered interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 568–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, A. G., Chance, J. E., & Schneller, G. R. (1989). Frequency of eyewitness identification in criminal cases: A survey of prosecutors. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(1), 71–74. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329902
   Google Scholar
• Greene, E., Flynn, M. B., & Loftus, E. F. (1982). Inducing resistance to misleading information. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90571-0
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (1997). The Gudjonsson suggestibility scales. Manual. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (2006). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. In T. Williamson (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation (pp. 123–146). Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. (second edition). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Highhouse, S., & Bottrill, K. V. (1995). The influence of social (mis)information on memory for behavior in an employment interview. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, G. P., & Hall, D. T. (2004). Self-confidence and leader performance. Organizational Dynamics, 33(3), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, R. E., & Albon, A. J. (2004). Minimising misinformation effects in young children with cognitive interview mnemonics. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, R. E., Humphries, J. E., Milne, R., Memon, A., Houlder, L., Lyons, A., & Bull, R. (2012). Reducing misinformation effects in older adults with cognitive interview mnemonics. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, M. J., Davis, S. D., & Meade, M. L. (2013). The effects of initial testing on false recall and false recognition in the social contagion of memory paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 41(6), 820–831. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0299-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L. (2007). Self-confidence and metacognitive processes. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPaglia, J. A., & Chan, J. C. K. (2013). Testing increases suggestibility for narrative-based misinformation but reduces suggestibility for question-based misinformation. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(5), 593–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPaglia, J. A., Wilford, M. M., Rivard, J. R., Chan, J. C. K., & Fisher, R. P. (2014). Misleading suggestions can alter later memory reports even following a cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leippe, M. R., Eisenstadt, D., Rauch, S. M., & Stambush, M. A. (2006). Effects of social-comparative memory feedback on eyewitnesses’ identification confidence, suggestibility, and retrospective memory reports. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(3), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2803_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition, 17(3), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory: Figure 1. Learning & Memory, 12(4), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., & Hoffman, H. G. (1989). Misinformation and memory: The creation of new memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(1), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luna, K., & Martín-Luengo, B. (2012). Improving the accuracy of eyewitnesses in the presence of misinformation with the plurality option. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacBride, P. D., & Tuddenham, R. D. (1965). The influence of self-confidence upon resistance of perceptual judgments to group pressure. The Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1965.10545258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2003). Personality traits., 2nd ed. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, P. A. (1986). Effects of feedback on the self-confidence of men and women. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 840–847. https://doi.org/10.2307/255950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M., & Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.114.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(4), 340–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. N., & Lampinen, J. M. (2016). The use of recollection rejection in the misinformation paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morocco, P. E. (1978). The effects of descriptive, valenced, anonymous feedback on situational anxiety, self-confidence, feedback desirability and credibility, and task performance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 39(2 A), 681.
   Google Scholar
• Nader, K., Schafe, G. E., & Le Doux, J. E. (2000). Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature, 406(6797), 722–726. https://doi.org/10.1038/35021052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastaj, J., Szpitalak, M., & Bąbel, P. (2019). Can placebo administered in the guise of caffeine reduce the misinformation effect? Polish Psychological Bulletin, 50(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.24425/ppb.2019.129449
   Google Scholar
• Neuschatz, J. S., Payne, D. G., Lampinen, J. M., & Toglia, M. P. (2001). Assessing the effectiveness of warnings and the phenomenological characteristics of false memories. Memory (Hove, England), 9(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210042000076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeberst, A., & Blank, H. (2012). Undoing suggestive influence on memory: The reversibility of the eyewitness misinformation effect. Cognition, 125(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oney, E., & Oksuzoglu-Guven, G. (2015). Confidence: A critical review of the literature and an alternative perspective for general and specific self-confidence. Psychological Reports, 116(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.2466/07.PR0.116k14w0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansky, A., & Tenenboim, E. (2011). Inoculating against eyewitness suggestibility via interpolated verbatim vs. Gist testing. Memory & Cognition, 39(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0005-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, A., Buckley, S., & Dagnall, N. (2009). Reduced misinformation effects following saccadic bilateral eye movements. Brain and Cognition, 69(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S., Garry, M., Engle, R., Harper, W., & Clifasefi, D. N., & L, S. (2008). Psychotropic placebos reduce the misinformation effect by increasing monitoring at test. Memory (Hove, England), 16(4), 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210801956922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., Eijkemans, H., & Kemp, R. I. (2015). Investigating the impact of delayed administration on the efficacy of the self-administered interview, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.947670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrod, S., Loftus, E. F., & Winkler, J. (1982). The reliability of eyewitness testimony. A psychological perspective. In N. L. Kerr, & R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 119–168). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petruzzello, S. J., & Corbin, C. B. (1988). Tie effects of performance feedback on female self-confidence. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(2), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.10.2.174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polczyk, R. (2005). Interrogative suggestibility: Cross-cultural stability of psychometric and correlational properties of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(1), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polczyk, R. (2017). The “memory” misinformation effect may not be caused by memory failures: Exploring memory states of misinformed subjects. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 48(3), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.1515/ppb-2017-0045
   Google Scholar
• Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: How much is enough? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L. I., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L. I., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrasts analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In: M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 183–242). San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H., & Earle, T. C. (2005). Perception of risk: The influence of general trust, and general confidence. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000105315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S. K. (2013). To study the effect of academic achievement on the level of self confidence. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 8(1), 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Stankov, L., & Crawford, J. D. (1997). Self-confidence and performance on tests of cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 25(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90047-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., & Liu, T. J. (1983). Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, E. M. (2000). Self, the hyphen between culture and subjective well-being. In E. Diener, & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 63–87). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szpitalak, M. (2012). Motywacyjne mechanizmy efektu dezinformacji [motivational mechanisms of the misinformation effect]. Kraków.
   Google Scholar
• Szpitalak, M. (2015). W kierunku poprawy jakości zeznań świadów. [Towards improving eyewitness testimony]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
   Google Scholar
• Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2010). Warning against warnings: Alerted subjects may perform worse. Misinformation, involvement and warning as determinants of witness testimony. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 41(3), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10059-010-0014-2
   Google Scholar
• Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2011). Distortions in eyewitness memory - memory and extra-memory mechanisms. Problems of Forensic Sciences, 85, 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2013). Promoting eyewitness testimony quality: Warning vs. Reinforced self-affirmation as methods of reduction of the misinformation effect. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 44(1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.2478/ppb-2013-0009
   Google Scholar
• Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2014). Mental fatigue, mental warm-up, and self-reference as determinants of the misinformation effect. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 25(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2014.895024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2015). Reinforced self-affirmation as a method for reducing the eyewitness misinformation effect, Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(10), 911–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1077243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2016). Reinforced self-affirmation and interrogative suggestibility, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(4), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2015.1081088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2019a). How to induce resistance to the misinformation effect? Characteristics of positive feedback in the reinforced self-affirmation procedure, Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(7), 771–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1574791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2019b). Inducing resistance to the misinformation effect by means of reinforced self-affirmation: The importance of positive feedback. PLoS ONE, 14(1), e0210987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2020). Reducing interrogative suggestibility: The role of self-affirmation and positive feedback. PLoS ONE, 15(7), e0236088. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2021). Mediators and moderators of reinforced self-affirmation as a method for reducing the memory misinformation effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 12), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takai, N. (2011). Confidence-building and developmental changes in confidence from adolescence to late adulthood. The Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 24(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.11560/jahp.24.1_45
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. K., Bulevich, J. B., & Chan, J. C. K. (2010). Testing promotes eyewitness accuracy with a warning: Implications for retrieval enhanced suggestibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tormala, Z. L., Falces, C., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Ease of retrieval effects in social judgment: The role of unrequested cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant, J. P., Hall, D., & Loftus, E. F. (1986). Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading postevent information. Memory & Cognition, 14(4), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E. (1967). The effects of presentation and recall of material in free-recall learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80092-6
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Watkins, M. J. (1974). On negative transfer: Effects of testing one list on the recall of another. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80043-5
   Google Scholar
• Vealey, R. S. (1986). Conceptualization of sport-confidence and competitive orientation: Preliminary investigation and instrument development. Journal of Sport Psychology, 8(3), 221–246. (1988-00161-001). https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.8.3.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vealey, R. S., & Chase, M. A. (2008). Self-confidence in sport. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology., 3rd ed. (pp. 68–97). Champaign. Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Wagstaff, G. F., Wheatcroft, J. M., Burt, C., Pilkington, L., Wilkinson, H. J., and Hoyle, K., & D, J. (2011). Enhancing witness memory with focused meditation and eye-closure: Assessing the effects of misinformation. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 26(2), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-010-9082-7
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. P., Brakefield, T., Hobson, J. A., & Stickgold, R. (2003). Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Nature, 425(6958), 616–620. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). “Good, you identified the suspect”: Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Murray, D. M. (1984). Eyewitness confidence. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 155–170). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilford, M. M., Chan, J. C. K., & Tuhn, S. J. (2014). Retrieval enhances eyewitness suggestibility to misinformation in free and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, T., & Hardy, L. (2003). The relative impact of cognitive anxiety and self-confidence upon sport performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21(6), 443. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000101809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., & Loftus, E. F. (1998). How misinformation alters memories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1998.2467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaragoza, M. S., Belli, R. S., & Payment, K. E. (2007). Misinformation effects and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. In M. Garry, & H. Hayne (Eds.), Do justice and let the sky fall: Elizabeth F. Loftus and her contributions to science, law, and academic freedom (pp. 35–63). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Zaragoza, M. S., & Lane, S. M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 934–945. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar