A New Approach to Learning Probability in the First Statistics Course

References

• Ajzen, I. (1977), “Intuitive Theories of Events and the Effects of Base-rate Information on Prediction,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 303–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archbald, D. A., and Newmann, F. M. (1988), Beyond Standardized Testing: Assessing Authentic Academic Achievement in the Secondary School, Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Hillel, M. (1980), “The Base-Rate Fallacy in Probability Judgments,” Acta Psychologica, 44, 211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barz, T. J. (1970), “A Study of Two Ways of Presenting Probability and Statistics at the College Level,” unpublished dissertation, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Beyth-Marom, R., and Dekel, S. (1983), “A Curriculum to Improve Thinking Under Uncertainty,” Instructional Science, 12, 67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilotti-Aliaga, M. (1994), “Exploring Probability and Statistics Through Hands-on Experiments and Cooperative Learning,” in Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Section on Statistical Education, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 150–155.
   Google Scholar
• Borovcnik, M. (1991), “A Complementarity Between Intuitions and Mathematics.” in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Teaching Statistics, ed. D. Vere-Jones, Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute, 363–369.
   Google Scholar
• Borovcnik, M., and Bentz, H. J. (1991), “Empirical Research in Understanding Probability, in Chance Encounters: Probability in Education, eds. R. Kapadia and M. Borovcnik, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 73–105.
   Google Scholar
• Chance, B. (1997), “Experiences with Authentic Assessment Techniques in an Introductory Statistics Course,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 5 (3). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v5n3/chance.html)
   Google Scholar
• Clement, J., Brown, D. E., and Zeitsman, A. (1989), “Not All Preconceptions Are Misconceptions: Finding ‘Anchoring Conceptions’ for Grounding Instruction on Students' Intuitions,” International Journal of Science Education, 11 (special issue), 554–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, G. (1991), “Teaching Statistics: More Data, Less Lecturing,” Amstat News, 182 (1), 4.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, G. (1993), “Reconsidering Statistics Education: A National Science Foundation Conference,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 1 (1). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v1n1/cobb.html)
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. (1989), “A Double-Edged Sword, Review of Intuition in Science and Mathematics by E. Fischbein”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 213–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosmides, L., and, Tooby, J. (1996), “Are Humans Good Intuitive Statisticians After All? Rethinking Some Conclusions from the Literature on Judgment Under Uncertainty,” Cognition, 58, 1–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1994), “Performance-Based Assessment and Educational Equity,” Harvard Educational Review, 64 (1), 5–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• delMas, R. C., and Bart, W. M. (1987), “The Role of an Evaluation Exercise in the Resolution of Misconception of Probability,” paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, E. J. (1993), “A Cooperative Learning Activity on Methods of Selecting a Sample,” The American Statistician, 47, 104–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, R. (1988), “Conditional Probabilities: Insights and Difficulties,” in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Teaching Statistics, eds. R. Davidson and J. Swift, Victoria, BC: University of Victoria, 292–297.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R., and Konold, C. (1992), “The Psychology of Learning Probability,” in Statistics for the Twenty-First Century, MAA Notes (Number 26), eds. F. Gordon and S. Gordon. Washington D.C.: The Mathematics Association of America, 151–164.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E. (1987), Intuition in Science and Mathematics, Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E., and Gazit, A. (1984), “Does the Teaching of Probability Improve Probabilistic Intuitions?” Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E., Pampu, I., and Manzat, I. (1970a), “Comparison of Ratios and the Chance Concept in Children,” Child Development, 41, 377–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E., Pampu, I., and Manzat, I. (1970b), “Effects of Age and Instruction on Combinatory Ability in Children,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 261–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. (1992), “Notes: Assessment and Teaching Statistics,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 1 (1). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v1n1/cobb.supp.garfield1.html)
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. (1993), “Teaching Statistics Using Small-Group Cooperative Learning,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 1 (1). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v1n1/garfield.html)
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. (1994), “How Students Learn Statistics,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education [Online] 19:44–63. (www.dartmouth.edu/Echance/teaching/_aids)
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, J., and Ahlgren, A. (1988), “Difficulties in learning basic concepts in statistics: Implications for research,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 44–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. B., and delMas, R. C. (1989), “Reasoning About Chance Events: Assessing and Changing Students' Conception of Probability,” in 11th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2), New Brunswick: Rutgers, 189–195.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (1991), “How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond Heuristics and Biases,” European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 83–115.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. R. (1982), Probability Concepts in 11–16 Year Old Pupils, Loughborough University, UK: Centre for Advancement of Mathematical Education in Technology, 40 p.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. R. (1987), “Probability Concepts: Putting Research into Practice.” Teaching Statistics, 9 (1), 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. R. (1988), “Children's Understanding of Randomness: Report of a Survey of 1600 Children Aged 7–11 Years,” in The Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Teaching Statistics, eds. R. Davidson and J. Swift. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria, 287–291.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, R. V. (1991), “Statistical Education: Improvements Are Badly Needed,” The American Statistician, 45, 342–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, R. V. (1992), “Towards Lean and Lively Courses in Statistics,” in Statistics for the Twenty-First Century, MAA Notes Number 26, eds. F. Gordon and S. Gordon, Washington D.C.: The Mathematics Association of America, 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1972), “Subjective Probability: A Judgment or Representativeness,” Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1973), “On the Psychology of Prediction,” Psychological Review, 80, 237–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1982), “On the Study of Statistical Intuitions,” Cognition, 11, 123–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapadia, R., and Borovcnik, M. (1991), “The Educational Perspective,” in Chance Encounters: Probability in Education, eds. R. Kapadia and M. Borovcnik, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Keeler, C. M., and Steinhorst, R. K. (1995), “Using Small Groups to Promote Active Learning in the Introductory Statistics Course: A Report from the Field,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 3 (2). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v3n2/Keeler.html)
   Google Scholar
• Keeler, C. M. (1997), “Portfolio Assessment in Graduate Level Statistics Courses,” in The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education, eds. I. Gal and J.B. Garfield, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 165–178.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, I. W., and Zwiers, F. W. (1988), “Mutually Exclusive and Independence: Unravelling Basic Misconceptions in Probability Theory,” in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Teaching Statistics, eds. R. Davidson and J. Swift, Victoria, BC: University of Victoria, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Konold, C. (1983), “Conceptions About Probability: Reality Between a Rock and a Hard Place,” University of Massachusetts, Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 4179b.
   Google Scholar
• Konold, C. (1989a), “Informal Conceptions of Probability,” Cognition and Instruction, 6, 59–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konold, C. (1989b), “An Outbreak of Belief in Independence?” in Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (Vol. 2), eds. G. Goldin, C. Maher, and B. Davis. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 203–209.
   Google Scholar
• Konold, C. (1991), “Understanding Students' Beliefs About Probability,” in Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education, ed. E. von Glasersfeld, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 139–156.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, J. E. (1960), “Relationship Between Selected Factors and Achievement in a Unit on Probability and Statistics for Twelfth Grade Students,” Dissertation Abstracts, 21:561.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S., Cobb, G., Garfield, J., and Meeker, W. Q. (1995), “Statistics Education Fin de Siecle,” The American Statistician, 49 (3), 250–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfannkuch, M., and Brown, C. M. (1996), “Building on and Challenging Students' Intuitions About Probability: Can We Improve Undergraduate Learning?,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 4 (1). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v4n1/pfannkuch.html)
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1970), Structuralism, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., Well, A. D., Konold, C., and Hardiman, P. (1987), “Understanding Conditional Probabilities,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 255–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., and Resnick, D. P. (1990), “Tests as Standards of Achievement in Schools,” in The Uses of Standardized Tests in American Education, Proceedings of the 1989 ETS Invitational Conference, ed. J. Pfleiderer, Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, H. V. (1992), “Student-Conducted Projects in Introductory Statistics Courses,” in Statistics for the Twenty-First Century, MAA Notes, (Number 26), eds. F. Gordon and S. Gordon. Washington D.C.: The Mathematical Association of America, 109–121.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, A. J., and Short, T. H. (1995), “Conditional Probability and Education Reform: Are They Compatible?” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 3 (2). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v3n2/rossman.html)
   Google Scholar
• Scheaffer, R. L. (1992), “Data, Discernment and Decisions: An Empirical Approach to Introductory Statistic,” in Statistics for the Twenty-First Century, MAA Notes (Number 26), eds. F. Gordon and S. Gordon, Washington D.C.: The Mathematics Association of America, 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, R. W., and Bentrup, A. (1984), “Reconsidering the Base Rate Fallacy: New Data and Conceptual Issues, The Stochastic Thinking Project,” Report No. 1, Bielefeld, FRG: University of Bielefeld.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. M. (1976), “A Clinical Investigation of College Students' Reliance Upon the Heuristics of Availability and Representativeness in Estimated the Likelihood of Probabilistic Events,” Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 5662A.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. M. (1977), “Misconceptions of Probability: An Experiment with a Small-Group, Activity-Based, Model-Building Approach to Introductory Probability at the College Level,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8, 285–316.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. M. (1983a), “Misconceptions of Probability, Systematic and Otherwise: Teaching Probability and Statistics so as to Overcome Some Misconceptions,” in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Teaching Statistics, eds. D.R. Grey and P. Holmes, Sheffield, UK: Teaching Statistics Trust, 784–801.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. M. (1983b), “The Psychology of Inference and the Teaching of Probability and Statistics: Two Sides of the Same Coin?” in Decision Making Under Uncertainty, ed. R. Scholz, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers, 325–350.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992), “Research in Probability and Statistics: Reflections and Directions,” in Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, ed. D.A. Grouws, New York: Macmillan Publishing, 465–494.
   Google Scholar
• Shulte, A. P. (1968), “Effect of a Unit in Probability and Statistics on Students and Teacher of Ninth Grade General Mathematics Class,” Dissertation Abstracts, 28, 4962A.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (1998), “Learning Statistics by Doing Statistics,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 6 (3). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v6n3/smith.html)
   Google Scholar
• Snee, R. D. (1993), “What's Missing in Statistical Education?” The American Statistician, 47, 149–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, J. L. (1992), “CHANCE: Case Studies of Current Chance Issues,” in Statistics for the Twenty-First Century, MAA Notes (Number 26), eds. F. Gordon and S. Gordon, Washington D.C.: The Mathematical Association of America, 281–297.
   Google Scholar
• Snell, J. L. (1994), “Take a Chance on CHANCE,” [Online]. (www.dartmouth.edu/~chance/course/Articles/ume.html)
   Google Scholar
• Snell, J. L., and Finn, J. (1992), “A Course Called ‘Chance,’” [Online]. (www.dartmouth.edu/~chance/course/Articles/sf/sf.html)
   Google Scholar
• Staddon, J. E. R. (1988), “Learning as Inference,” in Evolution and Learning, eds. R.C. Bolles and M.D. Beecher, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhorst, R. K., and Keeler, C. W. (1995), “Developing Material for Introductory Statistics Courses from a Conceptual, Active Learning Viewpoint,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 3 (3). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v3n3/Steinhorst.html)
   Google Scholar
• Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (1992), “Ecological Rationality and the Multimodula Mind,” Rep. No. 92–1, Santa Barbara: University of California, Center for Evolutionary Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974), “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science, 185, 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1980), “Causal Schemas in Judgment Under Uncertainty,” in Progress in Social Psychology, ed. M. Fischbein, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1983), “Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgement,” Psychological Review, 90 (4), 293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, D. G. (1991), “Why is Introductory Statistics Difficult to Learn? And What Can We Do to Make It Easier?” The American Statistician, 45, 290–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., and Konold, C. (1983), “Probability Estimation and the Use and Neglect of Base-Rate Information,” University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., and Boyce, S. (1990), “Understanding the Effects of Sample Size on the Mean,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 289–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R. W., and Ogden, R. T. (1998), “Interactive Demonstrations for Statistics Education on the World Wide Web,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 6 (3). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v6n3/west.html)
   Google Scholar
• White, C. W. (1974), “A Study of the Ability of First and Eighth Grade Students to Learn Basic Concepts of Probability and the Relationship Between Achievement in Probability and Selected Factors,” Dissertation Abstracts International, 35 1969A.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P. (1989), “The Futility of Trying to Teach Everything of Importance,” Educational Leadership, 47 (3), 44–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P. (1992), “Creating Tests Worth Taking,” Educational Leadership, 49 (8), 26–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P. (1993), Assessing Student Performance, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P., and McTighe, J. (1998), Understanding by Design, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Zetterqvist, L. (1997), “Statistics for Chemistry Students: How to Make a Statistics Course Useful by Focusing on Applications,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 5 (1). (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v5n1/zetterqvist.html)
   Google Scholar