Components of Statistical Thinking and Implications for Instruction and Assessment

References

• American Society for Quality (1996), Glossary of Statistical Terms, Milwaukee, WI: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., and Hunter, J. A. (1978), Statistics for Experimenters, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkley, J. (1999), “Microsoft witness attacked for contradictory opinions”, The New York Times, 15 Jan. 1999, C2.
   Google Scholar
• Chance, B. (1997), “Experiences with Alternative Assessment Techniques in Introductory Undergraduate Statistics Courses'”, Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 5(3).(ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v5n3/chance.html)
   Google Scholar
• Chatfield, C. (1988), Problem Solving: A Statistician's Guide, London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, G. (1992), “Teaching Statistics,” in Heeding the Call for Change: Suggestions for Curricular Action, ed. L. A. Steen, MAA Notes, Number 22, Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America, 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, G. (1998), “The Objective-Format Question in Statistics: Dead Horse, Old Bath Water, or Overlooked Baby?,” presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, R. J. M. (1995), “The ‘Unusual Episode’ Data Revisited”, Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 3(3), (ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v3n3/datasets.dawson.html)
   Google Scholar
• delMas, R., Garfield, J., and Chance, B. (1999), “A Model of Classroom Research in Action: Developing Simulation Activities to Improve Students' Statistical Reasoning”, Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 7(3).(ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/secure/v7n3/delmas.cfm)
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, D., Pisani, R., and Purves, R. (1998), Statistics (3rd ed.), New York: W. W. Norton and Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, I., Ahlgren, C., Burrill, G., Landwehr, J., Rich, W., and Begg, A. (1995), “Working Group: Assessment of Interpretive Skills,” Writing Group Draft Summaries Conference on Assessment Issues in Statistics Education, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, I. (1998), “From the Director”, News and Views [Online], 13. (www.scc.ms.unimelb.edu.au/news/n13.html)
   Google Scholar
• Hoerl, R. W. (1997), “Introductory Statistical Education: Radical Redesign is Needed, or is it?”, Newsletter for the Section on Statistical Education of the American Statistical Association [Online], 3(1).(renoir.vill.edu/∼short/StatEd/v3n1/Hoerl.html)
   Google Scholar
• Mallows, C. (1998), “The Zeroth Problem,” The American Statistician, 52, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S. (1990), “Uncertainty,” in On the Shoulders of Giants, ed. L. A. Steen, National Academy Press, 95–173.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S. (1998), “Statistics Among the Liberal Arts,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 1253–1259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S. (1999), “Discussion: What Shall We Teach Beginners?,” International Statistical Review, 67, 250–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S., and McCabe, G. P. (1998), Introduction to the Practice of Statistics (3rd ed.), New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. (ed.) (2001), Teaching Statistics: Resources for Undergraduate Instructors, Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America and American Statistical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, R., Haugh, L. D., and Goodman, A. (eds.) (1998), Statistical Case Studies: A Collaboration Between Academe and Industry, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association/SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F. L., and Schafer, D. W. (1997), The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis, Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, A. J., and Chance, B. L. (2001), Workshop Statistics: Discovery with Data (2nd ed.), Emeryville, CA: Key College Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Scheaffer, R., Gnanadesikan, M., Watkins, A., and Witmer, J. (1996), Activity-Based Statistics, New York: Springer-Verlag Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Short, T. H., Moriarty, H., and Cooley, M. E. (1995), “Readability of Educational Materials for Patients with Cancer”, Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 3(2),(ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v3n2/datasets.short.html)
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. M. F. (1999), “Discussion” in response to Wild and Pfannkuch, International Statistical Review, 67, 248–250.
   Google Scholar
• Snee, R. D. (1990), “Statistical Thinking and Its Contribution to Total Quality,” The American Statistician, 44, 116–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snee, R. D. (1999), “Discussion: Development and Use of Statistical Thinking: A New Era,” International Statistical Review, 67, 255–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurrier, J. D. (1999), The Practice of Statistics: Putting the Pieces Together, Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sylwester, D. (1993), “Statistical Thinking”, AMSTAT News, February, .
   Google Scholar
• Urschel, J. (1994), “Putting a reality check on ‘Holocaust denial’”, USA Today, January 12, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Utts, J. (1999), Seeing Through Statistics, Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, C. J. (1994), “Embracing the ‘Wider View’ of Statistics,” The American Statistician, 48, 163–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild, C. J., and Pfannkuch, M. (1999), “Statistical Thinking in Empirical Enquiry,” International Statistical Review, 67, 223–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar