The Role of Statistics Educators in the Quantitative Literacy Movement

References

• Barnett, S.M. and Ceci, S.J. (2002), “When and Where Do We Apply What We Learn? A Taxonomy for Far Transfer,” Psychological Bulletin, 128 (4), 612–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassok, M. and Holyoak, K.J. (1989), “Interdomain Transfer Between Isomorphic Topics in Algebra and Physics,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., and Cocking, R.R. (eds.) (2001), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J., and Glaser, R. (1981), “Categorization and Representation of Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems,” Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzens, M.B. (2003), “Educational Policy and Decision Making,” in Madison and Steen (eds.), Quantitative Literacy: Why Numeracy Matters for Schools and Colleges (pp. 197–198), National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
   Google Scholar
• delMas, R.C., Garfield, J., and Chance, B.L. (1999), “A Model of Classroom Research in Action: Developing Simulation Activities to Improve Students' Statistical Reasoning,” Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 7 (3). ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/secure/v7n3/delmas.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Detterman, D.K. (1993), “The Case for the Prosecution: Transfer as an Epiphenomenon,” in Detterman and Sternberg (eds.), Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition, and Instruction (pp 1–24), Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Detterman, D.K. and Sternberg, R.J. (eds.) (1993), Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition, and Instruction, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fong, G.T., Krantz, D.H., and Nisbett, R.E. (1986), “The Effects of Statistical Training on Thinking about Everyday Problems,” Cognitive Psychology, 18, 253–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. (1995), “How Students Learn Statistics,” International Statistical Review, 63, 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, J. and Ahlgren, A. (1994), “Student Reactions to Learning About Probability and Statistics: Evaluating the Quantitative Literacy Project,” School Science & Mathematics, 94 (2), 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Haines, B. A., and Moore, C. F. (2003), “Integrating Themes from Cognitive and Social Cognitive Development into the Study of Judgment and Decision Making,” in Schneider and Shanteau (eds.), Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research (pp. 246–283), New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (eds.) (1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klaczynski, P.A. and Gordon, D.H. (1996), “Everyday Statistical Reasoning During Adolescence and Young Adulthood: Motivational, General Ability, and Developmental Influences,” Child Development, 67, 2873–2891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konold, C. (1989), “Informal Conceptions of Probability,” Cognition and Instruction, 6 (1), 59–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korey, J. (2000), “Dartmouth College of Mathematics Across the Curriculum Evaluation Summary: Mathematics and Humanities Courses,” Mathematics Across the Curriculum at Dartmouth College, www.math.dartmouth.edu/~matc/Evaluation/humeval.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kosonen, P. And Winne, P.H. (1995), “Effects of Teaching Statistical Laws on Reasoning About Everyday Problems,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 87 (1), 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, D.R. and Nisbett, R.E. (1990), “A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Undergraduate Training on Reasoning,” Developmental Psychology, 26 (6), 952–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M.C. (2001), “A Collaborative Convergence on Studying Reasoning Processes: A Case Study in Statistics, in Carver and Klahr (eds.), Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-five Years of Progress (pp. 347–384), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, M.C. and Greenhouse, J.B. (2000), “Applying Cognitive Theory to Statistics Instruction,” The American Statistician, 54 (3), 196–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madison, B.L. (2004), “Two Mathematics: Ever the Twain Shall Meet?,” Peer Review, 6 (4), 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, S. and Evans, A. (1987), “Learning Functional Relations: A Theoretical and Instructional Analysis,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 106–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheaffer, R.L. (2003), “Statistics and Quantitative Literacy,” in Madison and Steen (eds.), Quantitative Literacy: Why Numeracy Matters for Schools and Colleges (pp. 145–152), National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, M.J. (1977), “Misconceptions of Probability: An Experiment with a Small-Group, Activity-Based, Model Building Approach to Introductory Probability at the College Level,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8, 285–316.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, L. (ed.) (2001), Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy, Princeton, NJ: The National Council.
   Google Scholar
• Tritelli, D. (2004), “From the Editor,” Peer Review, 6 (4), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1982a), “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” in Kahneman, Slovic, and Tversky (eds.), Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (pp. 3–20), Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1982b), “Evidential Impact of Base Rates,” in Kahneman, Slovic, and Tversky (eds.), Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (pp. 153–160), Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Utts, J. (2003), “What Educated Citizens Should Know About Statistics and Probability,” The American Statistician, 57 (2), 74–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar